IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt22p191zs.html

First Look at the Plug-in Vehicle Secondary Market

Author

Listed:
  • Tal, Gil
  • Nicholas, Michael A.
  • Turrentine, Thomas S.

Abstract

In most markets in the world there are very few used PEVs. California is one of the first markets to have a significant secondary market - about 5-8% of the almost 200,000 PEVs in California are being used by a second owner. Looking at the market for conventional vehicles, used vehicle sales comprise the clear majority of all transactions while the new vehicle buyers are a small share of the households, making used PEV sales potentially very significant on the market as a whole. As the number of used PEVs grows, the secondary market for PEVs will have an increasing effect as used PEV buyers join new buyers in adopting a new technology. Can these used vehicles provide environmentally friendly choices to those who do not buy new vehicles? Is range degradation an important factor in the use and purchase of the vehicles? Do the subsidies provided by State, Federal and local authorities pass to the second owner and by how much? This report explores the used PEVs in the market and the motivations behind their purchase and use.

Suggested Citation

  • Tal, Gil & Nicholas, Michael A. & Turrentine, Thomas S., 2017. "First Look at the Plug-in Vehicle Secondary Market," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt22p191zs, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt22p191zs
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/22p191zs.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Majid, Kashef Abdul & Russell, Cristel Antonia, 2015. "Giving green a second thought: Modeling the value retention of green products in the secondary market," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 994-1002.
    2. Jiawei Chen & Susanna Esteban & Matthew Shum, 2013. "When Do Secondary Markets Harm Firms?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(7), pages 2911-2934, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hardman, Scott, 2019. "Understanding the impact of reoccurring and non-financial incentives on plug-in electric vehicle adoption – A review," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 1-14.
    2. Piotr Wróblewski & Wojciech Lewicki, 2021. "A Method of Analyzing the Residual Values of Low-Emission Vehicles Based on a Selected Expert Method Taking into Account Stochastic Operational Parameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Sheykhfard, Abbas & Azmoodeh, Mohammad & Das, Subasish & Kutela, Boniphace, 2025. "Analyzing purchase intentions of used electric vehicles through consumer experiences: A structural equation modeling approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 125-137.
    4. Canepa, Kathryn & Hardman, Scott & Tal, Gil, 2019. "An early look at plug-in electric vehicle adoption in disadvantaged communities in California," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 19-30.
    5. Guo, Zhaomiao & Zhou, Yan, 2019. "Residual value analysis of plug-in vehicles in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 445-455.
    6. Hardman, Scott, 2019. "Understanding the Impact of Reoccurring and Non-Financial Incentives on Plug-in Electric Vehicle Adoption – A Review," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt7v13w987, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Turrentine, Thomas & Tal, Gil & Rapson, David, 2018. "The Dynamics of Plug-in Electric Vehicles in the Secondary Market and Their Implications for Vehicle Demand, Durability, and Emissions," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8wj5b0hn, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. Ximin (Natalie) Huang & Atalay Atasu & Necati Tereyağoğlu & L. Beril Toktay, 2023. "Lemons, Trade-Ins, and Certified Pre-Owned Programs," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 737-755, March.
    3. Mahdi Mahmoudzadeh, 2020. "On the Non‐Equivalence of Trade‐ins and Upgrades in the Presence of Framing Effect: Experimental Evidence and Implications for Theory," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(2), pages 330-352, February.
    4. Md Ismail Haidar, 2025. "Does Societal Trust Reduce Greenwashing? International Evidence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 3400-3424, March.
    5. Liu, Kemeng & Li, Gang, 2026. "Trendsetting in conspicuous consumption: The impact of a resale market," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    6. Dmitri Kuksov & Chenxi Liao, 2023. "Restricting Speculative Reselling: When “How Much” Is the Question," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 377-400, March.
    7. Tang, Edward Chi Ho & Leung, Charles Ka Yui & Ng, Joe Cho Yiu, 2018. "Does an Oligopolistic Primary Market Matter? The Case of an Asian Housing Market," MPRA Paper 93680, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Rubing Li & Arun Sundararajan, 2024. "The Rise of Recommerce: Ownership and Sustainability with Overlapping Generations," Papers 2405.09023, arXiv.org.
    9. Gerstle, Ari D. & Waldman, Michael, 2016. "Mergers in durable-goods industries: A re-examination of market power and welfare effects," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 677-692.
    10. Adam Copeland, 2014. "Intertemporal substitution and new car purchases," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(3), pages 624-644, September.
    11. Myrto Kalouptsidi, 2014. "Detection and Impact of Industrial Subsidies: The Case of World Shipbuilding," NBER Working Papers 20119, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Qiong Yao & Suzhen Zeng & Shibin Sheng & Shiyuan Gong, 2021. "Green innovation and brand equity: moderating effects of industrial institutions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 573-602, June.
    13. Secinaro, Silvana & Calandra, Davide & Lanzalonga, Federico & Ferraris, Alberto, 2022. "Electric vehicles’ consumer behaviours: Mapping the field and providing a research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 399-416.
    14. Shinichi Yamaguchi, 2021. "The effect of online C2C markets on new-product-purchasing behavior: an empirical analysis of Japanese selling apps," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-21, January.
    15. Yue, Sishi & Yang, Mo & Cao, Jiawei & Yang, Jinyu, 2025. "Do management climate change concerns mitigate greenwashing? Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    16. Yu, Ellen Pei-yi & Luu, Bac Van & Chen, Catherine Huirong, 2020. "Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    17. Yan, Wei & Xiong, Yu & Chu, Junhong & Li, Gendao & Xiong, Zhongkai, 2018. "Clicks versus Bricks: The role of durability in marketing channel strategy of durable goods manufacturers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 909-918.
    18. Cao, Jian & Wu, Sisi & Kumar, Sanjay, 2023. "Recovering and remanufacturing to fulfill EPR regulation in the presence of secondary market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    19. Antino Kim & Rajib L. Saha & Warut Khern-am-nuai, 2021. "Manufacturer’s “1-Up” from Used Games: Insights from the Secondhand Market for Video Games," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1173-1191, December.
    20. Işıl & Vishal V. Agrawal & Atalay Atasu, 2020. "Extended Producer Responsibility for Durable Products," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 364-382, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt22p191zs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.