IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i6d10.1007_s10668-024-04515-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to select remanufacturing mode: end-of-life or used product?

Author

Listed:
  • Sisi Wu

    (Zhejiang University of Science and Technology)

  • Jian Cao

    (Zhejiang University of Technology)

  • Qin Shao

    (Zhejiang University of Technology)

Abstract

Remanufacturing strategies contribute to green and sustainable production management plans, promising significant reductions in environmental impact as well as substantial production cost savings. Limited by some practical conditions, in addition to remanufacturing end-of-life (EOL) products, producers may also collect used products that are not completely scrapped for remanufacturing. Remanufacturing EOL and used products play an essential role in reducing the pressure of waste management. In the presence of secondary market, we explore and compare a durable-goods producer’s decision-makings by establishing models of remanufacturing EOL and used products, respectively. Analytical results show that remanufacturing used products is more conducive to producers to start remanufacturing, and beneficial to the development and maturity of the remanufacturing industry. Remanufacturing EOL or used products affects the secondary market; however, the latter has a greater effect. In addition, the comparison and analysis based on a case data show that the total enterprise profits, consumer surplus, and environmental performance of remanufacturing used products are higher than those of remanufacturing EOL products.

Suggested Citation

  • Sisi Wu & Jian Cao & Qin Shao, 2025. "How to select remanufacturing mode: end-of-life or used product?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 14175-14195, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04515-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-04515-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-024-04515-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-024-04515-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel W. Steeneck & Subhash C. Sarin, 2017. "Determining end-of-life policy for recoverable products," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(19), pages 5782-5800, October.
    2. Aditya Vedantam & Ananth Iyer, 2021. "Revenue‐Sharing Contracts Under Quality Uncertainty in Remanufacturing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2008-2026, July.
    3. Işıl & Vishal V. Agrawal & Atalay Atasu, 2020. "Extended Producer Responsibility for Durable Products," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 364-382, March.
    4. Pasquale Schiraldi, 2011. "Automobile replacement: a dynamic structural approach," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 42(2), pages 266-291, June.
    5. Hua Ke & Yong Wu & Hu Huang & Zhiyi Chen, 2018. "Optimal pricing decisions for a closed-loop supply chain with retail competition under fuzziness," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(9), pages 1468-1482, September.
    6. Meng, Kai & Lou, Peihuang & Peng, Xianghui & Prybutok, Victor, 2017. "Multi-objective optimization decision-making of quality dependent product recovery for sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 72-85.
    7. Atalay Atasu & Miklos Sarvary & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2008. "Remanufacturing as a Marketing Strategy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(10), pages 1731-1746, October.
    8. Masakazu Ishihara & Andrew T. Ching, 2019. "Dynamic Demand for New and Used Durable Goods Without Physical Depreciation: The Case of Japanese Video Games," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 392-416, May.
    9. Ximin (Natalie) Huang & Atalay Atasu & L. Beril Toktay, 2019. "Design Implications of Extended Producer Responsibility for Durable Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2573-2590, June.
    10. Li, Kate J. & Xu, Susan H., 2015. "The comparison between trade-in and leasing of a product with technology innovations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 134-146.
    11. Cai, Xiaoqiang & Lai, Minghui & Li, Xiang & Li, Yongjian & Wu, Xianyi, 2014. "Optimal acquisition and production policy in a hybrid manufacturing/remanufacturing system with core acquisition at different quality levels," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 374-382.
    12. Li, Yongjian & Feng, Lipan & Govindan, Kannan & Xu, Fangchao, 2019. "Effects of a secondary market on original equipment manufactures’ pricing, trade-in remanufacturing, and entry decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 751-766.
    13. Alexandar Angelus, 2011. "A Multiechelon Inventory Problem with Secondary Market Sales," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(12), pages 2145-2162, December.
    14. James D. Abbey & H. Neil Geismar & Gilvan C. Souza, 2019. "Improving Remanufacturing Core Recovery and Profitability Through Seeding," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(3), pages 610-627, March.
    15. S. Huang & Y. Yang & K. Anderson, 2001. "A Theory of Finitely Durable Goods Monopoly with Used-Goods Market and Transaction Costs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(11), pages 1515-1532, November.
    16. Xiao, Yongbo, 2017. "Choosing the right exchange-old-for-new programs for durable goods with a rollover," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 512-526.
    17. R. Canan Savaskan & Shantanu Bhattacharya & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2004. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 239-252, February.
    18. Y Xiong & G Li, 2013. "The value of dynamic pricing for cores in remanufacturing with backorders," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(9), pages 1314-1326, September.
    19. K. E. K. Vimal & Jayakrishna Kandasamy & Angel Acevedo Duque, 2021. "Integrating sustainability and remanufacturing strategies by remanufacturing quality function deployment (RQFD)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 14090-14122, September.
    20. Huang, Ximin & Gu, Jia-Wen & Ching, Wai-Ki & Siu, Tak-Kuen, 2014. "Impact of secondary market on consumer return policies and supply chain coordination," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 57-70.
    21. Hong, Xianpei & Govindan, Kannan & Xu, Lei & Du, Peng, 2017. "Quantity and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with technology licensing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 820-829.
    22. Kleber, Rainer & Reimann, Marc & Souza, Gilvan C. & Zhang, Weihua, 2018. "On the robustness of the consumer homogeneity assumption with respect to the discount factor for remanufactured products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 1027-1040.
    23. Vishal V. Agrawal & Mark Ferguson & L. Beril Toktay & Valerie M. Thomas, 2012. "Is Leasing Greener Than Selling?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 523-533, March.
    24. Pietro De Giovanni & Vinay Ramani, 2018. "Product cannibalization and the effect of a service strategy," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(3), pages 340-357, March.
    25. Bengang Gong & Chunming Victor Shi & Xiaodong Li & Jinshi Cheng, 2021. "Do the subsidies help or hurt the remanufacturing closed‐loop supply chain?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 961-973, June.
    26. Emad Sane Zerang & Ata Allah Taleizadeh & Jafar Razmi, 2018. "Analytical comparisons in a three-echelon closed-loop supply chain with price and marketing effort-dependent demand: game theory approaches," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 451-478, February.
    27. Subrata Mitra, 2016. "Optimal pricing and core acquisition strategy for a hybrid manufacturing/remanufacturing system," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(5), pages 1285-1302, March.
    28. Haiyan Wu & Xiaohua Han & Qianxia Yang & Xujin Pu, 2018. "Production and coordination decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing cost disruptions when retailers compete," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 227-235, January.
    29. Jian Cao & Xihui Chen & Sisi Wu & Sanjay Kumar, 2021. "Evolving remanufacturing strategies in China: an evolutionary game theory perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14827-14853, October.
    30. Xiong, Yu & Zhao, Pei & Xiong, Zhongkai & Li, Gendao, 2016. "The impact of product upgrading on the decision of entrance to a secondary market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 443-454.
    31. Wu, Xiaole & Zhou, Yu, 2019. "Buyer-specific versus uniform pricing in a closed-loop supply chain with third-party remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 548-560.
    32. Lacourbe, Paul, 2016. "Durable goods leasing in the presence of exporting used products to an international secondary market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 448-456.
    33. Yufei Hu & Lianghua Chen & Yingying Chi & Bowen Song, 2022. "Manufacturer encroachment on a closed‐loop supply chain with design for remanufacturing," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 1941-1959, September.
    34. Jiawei Chen & Susanna Esteban & Matthew Shum, 2013. "When Do Secondary Markets Harm Firms?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(7), pages 2911-2934, December.
    35. Migiwa Tanaka, 2008. "Deflation in Durable Goods Markets: An Empirical Model of the Tokyo Condominium Market," IMES Discussion Paper Series 08-E-02, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan.
    36. Yongming Zhang & Weida Chen, 2022. "Optimal production and financing portfolio strategies for a third‐party remanufacturing supply chain with capital constraint," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(7), pages 3072-3094, October.
    37. Lakdere Benkherouf & Konstantina Skouri & Ioannis Konstantaras, 2016. "Optimal Control of Production, Remanufacturing and Refurbishing Activities in a Finite Planning Horizon Inventory System," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 677-698, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cao, Jian & Wu, Sisi & Kumar, Sanjay, 2023. "Recovering and remanufacturing to fulfill EPR regulation in the presence of secondary market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    2. Aditya Vedantam & Emre M. Demirezen & Subodha Kumar, 2021. "Trade‐In or Sell in My P2P Marketplace: A Game Theoretic Analysis of Profit and Environmental Impact," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 3923-3942, November.
    3. Ehsan Shekarian & Simme Douwe Flapper, 2021. "Analyzing the Structure of Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Game Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    4. Li, Yongjian & Feng, Lipan & Govindan, Kannan & Xu, Fangchao, 2019. "Effects of a secondary market on original equipment manufactures’ pricing, trade-in remanufacturing, and entry decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 751-766.
    5. Liu, Jian & Mantin, Benny & Song, Xuefeng, 2022. "Rent, sell, and remanufacture: The manufacturer's choice when remanufacturing can be outsourced," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 184-200.
    6. Zhang, Abraham & Wang, Jason X. & Farooque, Muhammad & Wang, Yulan & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Multi-dimensional circular supply chain management: A comparative review of the state-of-the-art practices and research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    7. Du, Hang & Wei, Lai & Zhu, Qinghua, 2023. "Competition of consumables’ original brand manufacturers and remanufacturers considering the entry of compatible manufacturers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 679-692.
    8. A. K. Gaula & J. K. Jha, 2024. "Pricing strategy with quality improvement in a dual collection channel closed-loop supply chain under return uncertainty," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1-40, June.
    9. Chen Jin & Luyi Yang & Cungen Zhu, 2023. "Right to Repair: Pricing, Welfare, and Environmental Implications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 1017-1036, February.
    10. Lijun Meng & Qiang Qiang & Zuqing Huang & Baoyou Zhang & Yuxiang Yang, 2020. "Optimal Pricing Strategy and Government Consumption Subsidy Policy in Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Third-Party Remanufacturer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-29, March.
    11. Feng, Lipan & Zheng, Xiong & Govindan, Kannan & Xue, Kelei, 2019. "Does the presence of secondary market platform really hurt the firm?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 55-68.
    12. Zhou, Yu & Xiong, Yu & Jin, Minyue, 2021. "Less is more: Consumer education in a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    13. He, Qidong & Wang, Nengmin & Browning, Tyson R. & Jiang, Bin, 2022. "Competitive collection with convenience-perceived customers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 239-254.
    14. Ding, Junfei & Pu, Xujin & Zhang, Wen, 2024. "Outsourcing vs. authorization remanufacturing and differential vs. uniform pricing: A supply chain perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    15. Fangchao Xu & Xiukun Zhao & Qinzhen Qian, 2025. "Fee or tax? Optimal governance mode in sustainable supply chain with consideration of supplier’s effort under extended producer responsibility," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 347(3), pages 1671-1697, April.
    16. Qiao, Haike & Su, Qin, 2021. "Distribution channel and licensing strategy choice considering consumer online reviews in a closed-loop supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    17. Zhangwei Feng & Na Luo & Yanping Liu, 2021. "Trade-in Strategy and Competition between Two Independent Remanufacturers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-13, June.
    18. Xiao, Lu & Wang, Xian-Jia & Chin, Kwai-Sang, 2020. "Trade-in strategies in retail channel and dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    19. Vishal Agrawal & Atalay Atasu & Sezer Ülkü, 2021. "Leasing, Modularity, and the Circular Economy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(11), pages 6782-6802, November.
    20. Han, Xiaohua & Yang, Qianxia & Shang, Jennifer & Pu, Xujin, 2017. "Optimal strategies for trade-old-for-remanufactured programs: Receptivity, durability, and subsidy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 602-616.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04515-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.