IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

The separation of lower and higher attaining pupils in the transition from primary to secondary schools: a longitudinal study of London

  • Richard Harris

    ()

Registered author(s):

    This paper uses methods of spatial analysis to show that lower and higher attaining pupils are separating from each other as they make the transition from primary to secondary schools in London. The observation is not simply a function of geography – that some places are more affluent, with a link between wealth and educational advantage – because separations emerge between locally competing secondary schools: those that are drawing their intakes from the same primary schools. Whilst the separations are partly exacerbated by selective and by faith schools, in all but one year during the period 2003‐8 they remain statistically significant even when those schools are omitted. However, there is no evidence to suggest the separation of lower and higher attaining pupils is getting worse or better, suggesting the geographical determinants of “choice” are strong and not easily changed.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmpo/publications/papers/2011/wp257.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Department of Economics, University of Bristol, UK in its series The Centre for Market and Public Organisation with number 11/257.

    as
    in new window

    Length: 28 pages
    Date of creation: Mar 2011
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:bri:cmpowp:11/257
    Contact details of provider: Postal: 2 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TX
    Phone: 0117 33 10799
    Fax: 0117 33 10705
    Web page: http://www.bris.ac.uk/cmpo/
    Email:


    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Michael Poulsen & Ron Johnston & James Forrest, 2001. "Intraurban ethnic enclaves: introducing a knowledge-based classification method," Environment and Planning A, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 33(11), pages 2071-2082, November.
    2. Steve Gibbons & Shqiponja Telhaj, 2006. "Are Schools Drifting Apart? Intake Stratification in English Secondary Schools," CEE Discussion Papers 0064, Centre for the Economics of Education, LSE.
    3. Ron Johnston & Kelvyn Jones, 2010. "Measuring segregation—a cautionary tale," Environment and Planning A, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 42(6), pages 1264-1270, June.
    4. Rebecca Allen & Anna Vignoles, 2006. "What Should an Index of School Segregation Measure?," CEE Discussion Papers 0060, Centre for the Economics of Education, LSE.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bri:cmpowp:11/257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.