IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boh/wpaper/03_2022.html

Optimization potential in SME marketing communication in a Czech-German comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Enz

Abstract

Technological progress ensures a growing number of communication channels. National and international corporations use the new tools for intensive customer communication. SMEs therefore are in danger of disappearing from their consumers' field of vision. This paper examines the current communication behavior of SMEs. Future developments also are identified. The analysis of a large-scale survey of companies shows that the number of communication channels used depends on the size of a company. It is found that SMEs currently use fewer communication channels than large companies. Marketing communication is also much less professionalized in small companies. For example, this paper shows that only 25% of companies with an annual turnover of less than 2 million euros have their communication budgets. For SMEs with an annual turnover of 10 to 50 million euros, the share is already 58%. The importance of communication channels, on the other hand, depends on the regional context of the company's headquarters. Thus, the prioritization of certain communication channels is significantly dependent on the region in which a company is located. However, the research shows that SMEs across regions and size categories are aware of changes in the media use of their target groups. Nevertheless, many SMEs do not want to or cannot use all communication channels considered relevant in the future. This is equally evident among Czech and German SMEs, although German companies use more communication channels on average than Czech ones. This study also shows that SMEs are generally not willing to increase their marketing communication staff at present. This means that SME management faces the challenge of setting the correct priorities in customer communication. On the German side, the focus is on weighting. For Czech companies, the focus is on channel selection. This paper thus shows that there is potential for optimization for Czech and German SMEs. If it is possible to optimally reflect regional peculiarities in the use of media in the communication mix, efficiency increases and even the development of a competitive advantage over large companies is possible.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Enz, 2022. "Optimization potential in SME marketing communication in a Czech-German comparison," Economics Working Papers 2022-03, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Economics, revised 14 Apr 2022.
    • Handle: RePEc:boh:wpaper:03_2022
    DOI: 10.32725/ewp.2022.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ewp.ef.jcu.cz/doi/10.32725/ewp.2022.003.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://ewp.ef.jcu.cz/doi/10.32725/ewp.2022.003.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32725/ewp.2022.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jaroslav Vrchota & Tomas Volek & Martina Novotná, 2019. "Factors Introducing Industry 4.0 to SMES," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Barry L. Bayus & Gary Erickson & Robert Jacobson, 2003. "The Financial Rewards of New Product Introductions in the Personal Computer Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(2), pages 197-210, February.
    3. Holger Zemanek & Jörg Krämer & Marco Wagner & Thieß Petersen & Tom Krebs & Martin Scheffel & Thomas Mayer & Steffen Elstner & Christoph M. Schmidt, 2016. "Geringes Wirtschaftswachstum und Abwärtstrend bei Investitionen: Wege aus der Wachstumsschwäche," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 69(22), pages 03-21, November.
    4. Welter, Friederike & May-Strobl, Eva & Holz, Michael & Pahnke, André & Schlepphorst, Susanne & Wolter, Hans-Jürgen & Kranzusch, Peter, 2015. "Mittelstand zwischen Fakten und Gefühl," IfM-Materialien 234, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    5. Richard van der Wurff & Piet Bakker & Robert Picard, 2008. "Economic Growth and Advertising Expenditures in Different Media in Different Countries," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 28-52.
    6. Ron Martin & Peter Sunley, 2003. "Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea?," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 5-35, January.
    7. Michael Berlemann & Vera Jahn & Robert Lehmann, 2019. "Wie ist der Mittelstand in Deutschland verteilt? Eine Analyse mit Befragungsdaten," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 26(01), pages 23-28, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rujirutana Mandhachitara & Randall Shannon, 2016. "The Formation and Sustainability of same Product Retail Store Clusters in A Modern Mega City," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 107(5), pages 567-581, December.
    2. Del Barrio-García, Salvador & Kamakura, Wagner A. & Luque-Martínez, Teodoro, 2019. "A Longitudinal Cross-product Analysis of Media-budget Allocations: How Economic and Technological Disruptions Affected Media Choices Across Industries," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 1-15.
    3. Aksoy, Hasan, 2017. "How do innovation culture, marketing innovation and product innovation affect the market performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 133-141.
    4. Lucio Biggiero & Enrico Sevi, 2009. "Opportunism by cheating and its effects on industry profitability. The CIOPS model," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 191-236, September.
    5. Ashish Sood & Gerard J. Tellis, 2009. "Do Innovations Really Pay Off? Total Stock Market Returns to Innovation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 442-456, 05-06.
    6. Wandel, Jürgen, 2009. "Agroholdings and clusters in Kazakhstan's agro-food sector [Agroholdings und Clusters in Kasachstan’s Agrar- und Ernährungssektor]," IAMO Discussion Papers 126, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    7. Wang, Liang & Tan, Justin & Li, Wan, 2018. "The impacts of spatial positioning on regional new venture creation and firm mortality over the industry life cycle," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 41-52.
    8. Ion Lucian Ceapraz & Miravo Rakotovao & Loïc Sauvée, 2021. "The Regional Integration Of Bioraffineries In France: An Approach By The Territorial Innovation Model," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 15(1), pages 33-51, JUNE.
    9. Filippova, Irina & Unknown, Unknown, 2013. "Кластерные Стратегии И Кластерные Инициативы: Перспективы И Факторы Эффективной Кластеризации [Cluster strategy and cluster initiatives: prospects and factors of effective clustering]," MPRA Paper 49949, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Carlos Sangreman & Sandra Silva, 2012. "The New Tool of Portuguese Cooperation: Cooperation Clusters / O Novo Instrumento da Cooperação Portuguesa: Clusters de Cooperação," CEsA Working Papers 113, CEsA - Centre for African and Development Studies.
    11. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/f0uohitsgqh8dhk980ea412b5 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Matthias Firgo & Peter Mayerhofer, 2015. "Wissens-Spillovers und regionale Entwicklung - welche strukturpolitische Ausrichtung optimiert des Wachstum?," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 144, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    13. Anastasiia Konstantynova & James R. Wilson, 2014. "Comparing Cluster Policies: An Analytical Framework," Working Papers 2014R01, Orkestra - Basque Institute of Competitiveness.
    14. Yasuyuki Motoyama & Susan Clark Muntean & Karren Knowlton & Banu Ozkazanc-Pan, 2021. "Causes of the gender divide within entrepreneurship ecosystems," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(3), pages 187-204, May.
    15. Aspers, Patrik & Kohl, Sebastian & Power, Dominic, 2008. "Economic sociology discovering economic geography," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 9(3), pages 3-16.
    16. João J. M. Ferreira & Cristina I. Fernandes & Mário L. Raposo, 2017. "The Effects of Location on Firm Innovation Capacity," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(1), pages 77-96, March.
    17. Elisa Giuliani, 2010. "Clusters, Networks and Economic Development: An Evolutionary Economics Perspective," Chapters, in: Ron Boschma & Ron Martin (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Nils Grashof, 2020. "Sinking or swimming in the cluster labour pool? A firm-specific analysis of the effect of specialized labour," Jena Economics Research Papers 2020-006, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    19. Paige Clayton & Maryann Feldman & Benjamin Montmartin, 2024. "Entrepreneurial finance and regional ecosystem emergence," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1493-1521, April.
    20. Elisa Giuliani, 2005. "The Structure of Cluster Knowledge Networks Uneven, not Pervasive and Collective," DRUID Working Papers 05-11, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    21. Speldekamp, Daniël & Knoben, Joris & Saka-Helmhout, Ayse, 2020. "Clusters and firm-level innovation: A configurational analysis of agglomeration, network and institutional advantages in European aerospace," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • M37 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Advertising

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boh:wpaper:03_2022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Markéta Matějíčková (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efjcucz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.