IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bav/wpaper/221_fritzgrimmweberyomtovpraditya.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Uncover your risk! Using Facebook to increase personal risk awareness and screening of type 2 diabetes in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Manuela Fritz
  • Michael Grimm
  • Ingmar Weber
  • Elad Yom-Tov
  • Benedictus Praditya

Abstract

We assess whether social media – in particular Facebook – can serve as an efficient and cost-effective instrument to increase type 2 diabetes awareness and encourage risk screening activities in Indonesia, where – as in the rest of Southeast Asia – the prevalence of the disease and with it the rates of undiagnosed cases have dramatically increased in the last decade. We use Facebook’s advertisement function to randomly distribute graphical ads related to the risk and consequences of diabetes to Facebook users above the age of 35 in Jakarta and Yogyakarta. The ads differ in their message (“theme†) and graphical design, but equally invite viewers to visit an information website on which they can participate in a diabetes self-screening activity. Depending on their determined risk score, participants receive a recommendation to contact their GP and ask for an in-depth screening. We find that the ad themes that we label “information†and “shock†outperform all other themes in terms of creating link clicks and completed screening questionnaires. A follow-up survey six weeks after the online screening suggests that approximately 28% of respondents that were found to have a high risk, plan to schedule (or already have scheduled) an appointment for a professional screening. The complementary cost-effectiveness analysis shows that such an online public health campaign can be very cost-effective with a cost of approximately US$9 per newly diagnosed person with type 2 diabetes.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuela Fritz & Michael Grimm & Ingmar Weber & Elad Yom-Tov & Benedictus Praditya, 2022. "Uncover your risk! Using Facebook to increase personal risk awareness and screening of type 2 diabetes in Indonesia," Working Papers 221, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).
  • Handle: RePEc:bav:wpaper:221_fritzgrimmweberyomtovpraditya
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://bgpe.cms.rrze.uni-erlangen.de/files/2023/07/221_Uncover-your-risk-Using-Facebook-to-increase-personal-risk-awareness-and-screening-of-type-2-diabetes-in-Indonesia.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2021
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ro'ee Levy, 2021. "Social Media, News Consumption, and Polarization: Evidence from a Field Experiment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(3), pages 831-870, March.
    2. Kim, Hyuncheol Bryant & Lee, Suejin A. & Lim, Wilfredo, 2019. "Knowing is not half the battle: Impacts of information from the National Health Screening Program in Korea," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1-14.
    3. Mecheva, Margarita de Vries & Rieger, Matthias & Sparrow, Robert & Prafiantini, Erfi & Agustina, Rina, 2021. "Snacks, nudges and asymmetric peer influence: Evidence from food choice experiments with children in Indonesia," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Slade, Alexander N., 2012. "Health investment decisions in response to diabetes information in older Americans," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 502-520.
    5. Jennifer Manne-Goehler & Pascal Geldsetzer & Kokou Agoudavi & Glennis Andall-Brereton & Krishna K Aryal & Brice Wilfried Bicaba & Pascal Bovet & Garry Brian & Maria Dorobantu & Gladwell Gathecha & Mon, 2019. "Health system performance for people with diabetes in 28 low- and middle-income countries: A cross-sectional study of nationally representative surveys," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Kuehnle, Daniel, 2019. "How effective are pictorial warnings on tobacco products? New evidence on smoking behaviour using Australian panel data," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. Grow, André & Perrotta, Daniela & Del Fava, Emanuele & Cimentada, Jorge & Rampazzo, Francesco & Gil-Clavel, Sofia & Zagheni, Emilio, 2020. "Addressing Public Health Emergencies via Facebook Surveys: Advantages, Challenges, and Practical Considerations," SocArXiv ez9pb, Center for Open Science.
    8. Orazi, Davide C. & Johnston, Allen C., 2020. "Running field experiments using Facebook split test," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 189-198.
    9. Brett R. Gordon & Florian Zettelmeyer & Neha Bhargava & Dan Chapsky, 2019. "A Comparison of Approaches to Advertising Measurement: Evidence from Big Field Experiments at Facebook," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 193-225, March.
    10. Krishnamurthy, Parthasarathy & Carter, Patrick & Blair, Edward, 2001. "Attribute Framing and Goal Framing Effects in Health Decisions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 382-399, July.
    11. Dammert, Ana C. & Galdo, Jose C. & Galdo, Virgilio, 2014. "Preventing dengue through mobile phones: Evidence from a field experiment in Peru," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 147-161.
    12. Capuno, Joseph & Kraft, Aleli & O'Donnell, Owen, 2021. "Effectiveness of clinic-based cardiovascular disease prevention: A randomized encouragement design experiment in the Philippines," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kämpfen, F.; & Gómez-Olivé, X.; & O’Donnell, O.; & Riumallo Herl, C.;, 2023. "Effectiveness of Population-Based Hypertension Screening: A Multidimensional Regression Discontinuity Design," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 23/15, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    2. Gaggero, A. & Gil, J. & Jiménez-Rubio, D. & Zucchelli, E., 2021. "Health information and lifestyle behaviours: the impact of a diabetes diagnosis," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 21/02, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    3. Luciana Juvenal & Paulo Santos Monteiro, 2024. "Risky Gravity," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 22(4), pages 1590-1627.
    4. Gaggero, Alessio, 2020. "The effect of type 2 diabetes diagnosis in the elderly," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    5. Lenel, Friederike & Priebe, Jan & Satriawan, Elan & Syamsulhakim, Ekki, 2022. "Can mHealth campaigns improve CCT outcomes? Experimental evidence from sms-nudges in Indonesia," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    6. Wallach, Karen Anne & Popovich, Deidre, 2023. "When Big Is Less than Small: Why dominant brands lack authenticity in their sustainability initiatives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. Gaggero, Alessio & Gil, Joan & Jiménez-Rubio, Dolores & Zucchelli, Eugenio, 2022. "Does health information affect lifestyle behaviours? The impact of a diabetes diagnosis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    8. Bo-Mi Shin & Jung-Sun Heo & Jae-In Ryu, 2021. "An Investigation of the Association between Health Screening and Dental Scaling in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-13, April.
    9. Gordon Burtch & Robert Moakler & Brett R. Gordon & Poppy Zhang & Shawndra Hill, 2025. "Characterizing and Minimizing Divergent Delivery in Meta Advertising Experiments," Papers 2508.21251, arXiv.org.
    10. Felix Chopras & Ingar Haaland & Christopher Roth, 2024. "The Demand for News: Accuracy Concerns Versus Belief Confirmation Motives," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 134(661), pages 1806-1834.
    11. Andrea Tesei & Filipe Campante & Ruben Durante, 2022. "Media and Social Capital," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 69-91, August.
    12. Francesco Capozza & Ingar Haaland & Christopher Roth & Johannes Wohlfart, 2021. "Studying Information Acquisition in the Field: A Practical Guide and Review," CEBI working paper series 21-15, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).
    13. Frédéric Docquier & Hillel Rapoport, 2025. "The vicious circle of xenophobia: immigration and right wing populism," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 40(122), pages 551-573.
    14. Carattini, Stefano & Gillingham, Kenneth & Meng, Xiangyu & Yoeli, Erez, 2024. "Peer-to-peer solar and social rewards: Evidence from a field experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 340-370.
    15. Berman, Ron & Heller, Yuval, 2020. "Naive Analytics Equilibrium," MPRA Paper 103824, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. He, Junnan & Calder, Bobby J., 2020. "The experimental evaluation of brand strength and brand value," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 194-202.
    17. repec:bge:wpaper:1501 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Ying Bao & Jessie Liu, 2025. "Spiral of Silence: Polarizing Content Creation through Moderating Toxicity," CESifo Working Paper Series 12008, CESifo.
    19. Cheolmin Kang & Akira Kawamura & Haruko Noguchi, 2021. "Benefits of knowing own health status: effects of health check-ups on health behaviours and labour participation," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(11), pages 926-931, June.
    20. Iizuka, Toshiaki & Nishiyama, Katsuhiko & Chen, Brian & Eggleston, Karen, 2021. "False alarm? Estimating the marginal value of health signals," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    21. Mochon, Daniel & Schwartz, Janet, 2024. "The confrontation effect: When users engage more with ideology-inconsistent content online," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bav:wpaper:221_fritzgrimmweberyomtovpraditya. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anton Barabasch (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vierlde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.