IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2608.25488.html

Social Network Structure, Wealth, and Wealth Inequality Across Cultures

Author

Listed:
  • Eleanor A. Power
  • Monique Borgerhoff Mulder
  • Samuel Bowles
  • Matthew O. Jackson
  • Jeremy Koster
  • Daniel Redhead
  • Thomas Rutter
  • Sahana Subramanyam
  • Justin Weltz
  • Nurul Alam
  • Sarah Alami
  • Alexandra Alvergne
  • Curtis Atkisson
  • Michele Barnes
  • Bret Beheim
  • Christine M. Beitl
  • Madeline Brown
  • Mark Caudell
  • Wendy Ch'{a}vez-P'{a}ez
  • Komal Chauhan
  • Joshua Cinner
  • Siobh'{a}n Cully
  • Augusto Dalla Ragione
  • Angelina L. DeMarco
  • Ivan Deschenaux
  • Federico Fernandez
  • Juan Pablo Ferreiro
  • Drew Gerkey
  • Matthew Gervais
  • Christopher Golden
  • Gianluca Grimalda
  • Werner Hertzog
  • Paul L. Hooper
  • Karen Kramer
  • Geoff Kushnick
  • Banrida Langstieh
  • Rodrigo Lazo
  • Sheina Lew-Levy
  • Shane Macfarlan
  • Emmanuel Maliti
  • Karl J. Mertens
  • Madalena Monteban
  • Rafael Morais Chiaravalloti
  • Daniel Murphy
  • Kathryn Oths
  • Alejandro P'{e}rez Velilla
  • Emily Post
  • Sean Prall
  • Cody Ross
  • Anirudh Sankar
  • Brooke Scelza
  • Michael Schnegg
  • Edmond Seabright
  • Mary K. Shenk
  • Kathrine E. Starkweather
  • Chun-Yi Sum
  • Bram Tucker
  • Bapu Vaitla
  • Vivek Venkataraman
  • John P. Ziker

Abstract

Despite theory tying wealth inequality to social structure, empirical evidence has been limited to a few studies based on online social media data. This study uses a very different type of data, expands the global coverage to very different types of societies, and investigates new questions. In particular, we collect data from ~3500 sharing units (households) in 46 communities across the globe, representing considerable human social and cultural diversity. In each, we analyze the relationship between people's material wealth and the structure of social networks: borrowing money, sharing food, working together, socializing, etc. In almost all communities, a sharing unit's material wealth is positively associated with the number of other sharing units it both helps and is helped by. A sharing unit's wealth is also associated with the relative wealth of the sharing units to which it is linked---a form of economic homophily. Notably, communities with greater wealth inequality are also characterized by a network structure in which poorer sharing units are less well connected to wealthier ones. We augment our unique cross-cultural data with other community-level environmental, institutional, and economic attributes, opening new avenues for future research into the co-determination of wealth and social networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleanor A. Power & Monique Borgerhoff Mulder & Samuel Bowles & Matthew O. Jackson & Jeremy Koster & Daniel Redhead & Thomas Rutter & Sahana Subramanyam & Justin Weltz & Nurul Alam & Sarah Alami & Alex, 2026. "Social Network Structure, Wealth, and Wealth Inequality Across Cultures," Papers 2608.25488, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.25488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.25488
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.25488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.