IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/278284.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

World Oilseed Markets--Government Intervention and Multilateral Policy Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Bickerton, Thomas W.
  • Glauber, Joseph W.

Abstract

Government programs and policies have helped to shape the prevailing patterns of trade and production in global oilseed, oilseed meal, and vegetable oil markets. This report evaluates the adjustments that likely would occur in global oilseed and oilseed product markets if these policies and programs were removed. The effect of policy reform on world oilseed production and trade would be relatively small when compared with trade liberalization's effects on other agricultural commodities. Adjustments to liberalization would vary among regions and within individual oilseed sectors. Low-cost oilseed and vegetable oil producers, like the United States, Argentina, Canada, Indonesia, and Malaysia, could benefit, although their gains would be modest. Gains to Brazilian oilseed producers could be very small. High-cost producers, like EC farmers, could expect a significant reduction in their share of global oilseed production and exports.

Suggested Citation

  • Bickerton, Thomas W. & Glauber, Joseph W., 1990. "World Oilseed Markets--Government Intervention and Multilateral Policy Reform," Staff Reports 278284, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278284
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.278284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/278284/files/ers-report-450.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.278284?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roningen, Vernon O. & Dixit, Praveen M., 1989. "Economic Implications Of Agricultural Policy Reforms In Industrial Market Economies," Staff Reports 278843, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. C. Ford Runge & Heimpel Stanton, 1988. "The Political Economy of the Uruguay Round Negotiations: A View from Geneva," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(5), pages 1146-1152.
    3. Crowder, Brad & Davison, Cecil, 1989. "Soybeans: Background for 1990 Farm Legislation," Staff Reports 278246, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Ballenger, Nicole, 1988. "PSEs: What They Are And Their Role In Trade Negotiations," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 3(1), pages 1-2.
    5. Schmidt, Stephen C. & Gardiner, Walter H., 1988. "Nongrain Feeds: EC Trade and Policy Issues," Foreign Agricultural Economic Report (FAER) 147988, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Crowder, Brad & Davison, Cecil W. & Schaub, James D. & Wendland, Bruce, 1990. "Soybeans and Peanuts: Background for 1990 Farm Legislation," Agricultural Information Bulletins 262074, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Hyberg, Bengt & Mercier, Stephanie & Hoffman, Linwood A., 1990. "The World Coarse Grain Market-Government Intervention and Multilateral Policy Reform," Staff Reports 278278, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Babula, Ronald A. & Bessler, David A. & Reeder, John & Somwaru, Agapi, 2004. "Modeling U.S. Soy-Based Markets with Directed Acyclic Graphs and Time Series Econometrics: Evaluating the U.S. Market Impacts of High Soy Meal Prices," Working Paper ID Series 15885, United States International Trade Commission, Office of Industries.
    2. Mercier, Stephanie A. & Gohlke, Brian, 1995. "The Role of Quality in Soybean Import Decisionmaking," Agricultural Economic Reports 308427, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Babula, Ronald A. & Bessler, David A. & Reeder, John & Somwaru, Agapi, 2004. "Modeling U.S. Soy-Based Markets with Directed Acyclic Graphs and Bernanke Structural VAR Methods: The Impacts of High Soy Meal and Soybean Prices," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 35(3), pages 1-24, November.
    4. Moulay-Benaissa, Samia, 1992. "Agricultural trade liberalization in Morocco: the case of oilseeds sector," ISU General Staff Papers 1992010108000018140, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    5. McCormick, Ian. & Davison, Cecil W. & Hoskin, Roger L., 1992. "The U.S. Sunflower Industry," Agricultural Economic Reports 305475, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Hofkes, M. W. & Gerlagh, R. & Lise, W. & Verbruggen, H., 2002. "Is Economic Growth Sustainable? A Trend Analysis for the Netherlands, 1990-1995," Conference papers 330984, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Persaud, Suresh Chand & Chern, Wen S., 2002. "Meat Trade Liberalization And Soybean-Rapeseed Competition In The Japanese Market," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17.
    8. Erdman, Laurie, 1991. "Ec - U.S. Soybean And Soybean Product Trade Policy Issues And Disputes," Staff Papers 13778, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    9. S. McCorriston, 1993. "Rebalancing Ec Cereals Protection And The Gatt Uruguay Round," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 14-24, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lord, Ron & Barry, Robert D., 1990. "The World Sugar Market--Government Intervention and Multilateral Policy Reform," Staff Reports 278353, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Green, Robert C., 1991. "Program Provisions for Rye, Dry Edible Beans, Oil Crops, Tobacco, Sugar, Honey, Wool, Mohair, Gum Naval Stores, and Dairy Products: A Database for 1961-90," Staff Reports 278865, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Hahn, William F. & Crawford, Terry L. & Bailey, Linda & Shagam, Shayle, 1990. "The World Beef Market--Government Intervention and Multilateral Policy Reform," Staff Reports 278343, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Silvis, H. J. & van der Hamsvoort, C. P. C. M., 1996. "The AMS in agricultural trade negotiations: a review," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 527-539, December.
    5. Shagam, Shayle D., 1990. "The World Pork Market-Government Intervention and Multilateral Policy Reform," Staff Reports 278313, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Liapis, Peter S., 1998. "Government Policies And Their Effects On Resource Use In The U.S. Grain And Oilseed Sectors," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20861, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Cameron, D. Lynne & Spriggs, John, 1991. "International Effects Of Canada'S Western Grain Stabilization Program," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 16(2), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Ferris, John N., 1991. "Analysis Of The Past And Future Impacts Of The Wheat, Feed Grains And Conservation Reserve Provisions Of The Food Security Act Of 1985 On U.S. Agriculture," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271269, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Won W. Koo, 2002. "Alternative U.S. and EU Sugar Trade Liberalization Policies and their Implications," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 336-352.
    10. van Schalkwyk, H. D. & van Zyl, J. & Jooste, A., 1995. "The Effect Of The Exchange Rate And International Factors On The Competitive Position Of South African Wheat Producers," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 34(4), December.
    11. Tyers, Rod, 1992. "Searching under the Light: The Neglect of Dynamics and Risk in the Analysis of Food Trade Reforms," 1992 Occasional Paper Series No. 6 197873, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Knauss-Beary, Lori, 1991. "The effects of agricultural trade liberalization on less developed countries," ISU General Staff Papers 1991010108000017627, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    13. James Gleckler & Robert Koopman & Luther Tweeten, 1993. "European economic integration and the consequences for US agriculture," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(4), pages 325-337.
    14. Abler, David G & Shortle, James S, 1992. "Environmental and Farm Commodity Policy Linkages in the U.S. and the EC," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 19(2), pages 197-217.
    15. Groenewald, Jan A., 1998. "Reconsidering The Role Of Government In Southern African Agriculture," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 37(4), pages 1-10, December.
    16. Amanor-Boadu, Vincent & Hobbs, Jill E. & Kruja, Zana & Martin, Larry J., 1999. "Net Benefits Of Increased Trade Liberalization To The Canadian Economy," Miscellaneous Publications 18089, George Morris Center.
    17. Neff, Liana C. Cuffman, 1990. "The 1990 Farm Bill And Developing Countries," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 270907, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. Moschini, GianCarlo & Lapan, Harvey E. & Sobolevsky, Andrei, 2000. "Trading Technology As Well As Final Products: Roundup Ready Soybean and Welfare Effects in the Soybean Complex," Staff General Research Papers Archive 5317, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    19. Willems, Jaap & van Grinsven, Hans J.M. & Jacobsen, Brian H. & Jensen, Tenna & Dalgaard, Tommy & Westhoek, Henk & Kristensen, Ib Sillebak, 2016. "Why Danish pig farms have far more land and pigs than Dutch farms? Implications for feed supply, manure recycling and production costs," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 122-132.
    20. Rausser, Gordon C. & Rose, Marjorie B. & Irwin, Douglas A., 1990. "World commodity prices: the role of external debt and industrial country policies," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt3gz928h9, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.