IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersmp/402735.html

Global Food Assessment, 2025–35

Author

Listed:
  • Zereyesus, Yacob Abrehe
  • Cardell, Lila
  • Farris, Jarrad
  • Ajewole, Kayode
  • Johnson, Michael E.
  • Lin, Jessie
  • Valdes, Constanza
  • Zeng, Wendy

Abstract

This annual report is published by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service before September 30 of each year as required by section 408 (b) of Public Law 480 and 7 U.S.C. 1736b of Public Law 95−98. The results in this report are based on macroeconomic assumptions finalized as of August 2024. Food insecurity, defined by the lack of consistent access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food for an active and healthy life, affects millions globally. Declining incomes, high food prices, and food supply shocks exacerbate food security. This report, using the Global Food Assessment (GFA) model, projects food security trends in 83 low- and middle-income countries by estimating the percentage of people in each country consuming less than 2,100 kilocalories per person per day. The assessment reports a significant improvement in food security in 2025 compared to 2024 due to an average 3.7 percent growth in per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and reduced food price inflation. Specifically, the number of food insecure people is estimated to decrease by 26.7 percent (220.5 million people), reaching 604.2 million people, or 13.5 percent of the GFA population, in 2025. However, ongoing political and macroeconomic instability, armed conflict, and weather-related shocks such as droughts, are identified as key factors driving worsening food security in vulnerable countries. Over the next decade, a further 51.7 percent reduction in the proportion of food insecurity is projected, reaching 6.5 percent of the GFA population. This reduction is driven by sustained GDP growth, particularly in Asia and the Former Soviet Union, and relatively lower commodity prices. This would result in a food insecure population of 332.9 million by 2035, representing a 44.9 percent reduction relative to 2025.

Suggested Citation

  • Zereyesus, Yacob Abrehe & Cardell, Lila & Farris, Jarrad & Ajewole, Kayode & Johnson, Michael E. & Lin, Jessie & Valdes, Constanza & Zeng, Wendy, 2025. "Global Food Assessment, 2025–35," Miscellaneous Publications 402735, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:402735
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.402735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/402735/files/GFA-36.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.402735?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beghin, John & Meade, Birgit & Rosen, Stacey, 2017. "A food demand framework for International Food Security Assessment," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 827-842.
    2. John Muellbauer, 1975. "Aggregation, Income Distribution and Consumer Demand," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 42(4), pages 525-543.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cardell, Lila & Zereyesus, Yacob Abrehe & Ajewole, Kayode & Farris, Jarrad & Johnson, Michael E. & Lin, Jessie & Valdes, Constanza & Zeng, Wendy, 2024. "International Food Security Assessment, 2024–34," Miscellaneous Publications 402734, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Jacob Michels & Yacob Abrehe Zereyesus & John Beghin, 2025. "Increasing sedentary time, minimum dietary energy requirements, and food security assessment," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(4), pages 1383-1407, September.
    3. repec:ags:aaea22:335941 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Beckman, Jayson & Ivanic, Maros & Jelliffe, Jeremy L. & Baquedano, Felix G. & Scott, Sara G., 2020. "Economic and Food Security Impacts of Agricultural Input Reduction Under the European Union Green Deal’s Farm to Fork and Biodiversity Strategies," Agricultural Economic Reports 307277, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Zereyesus, Yacob Abrehe & Cardell, Lila & Valdes, Constanza & Ajewole, Keyode & Zeng, Wendy & Beckman, Jayson & Ivanic, Maros & Hashad, Reem & Jelliffe, Jeremy & Kee, Jennifer, . "International Food Security Assessment, 2022–32," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 2022(Food Secu).
    6. Felix Baquedano & Jeremy Jelliffe & Jayson Beckman & Maros Ivanic & Yacob Zereyesus & Michael Johnson, 2022. "Food security implications for low‐ and middle‐income countries under agricultural input reduction: The case of the European Union's farm to fork and biodiversity strategies," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 1942-1954, December.
    7. Timo Boppart, 2014. "Structural Change and the Kaldor Facts in a Growth Model With Relative Price Effects and Non‐Gorman Preferences," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 82, pages 2167-2196, November.
    8. william, barnett, 2013. "Friedman and Divisia Monetary Measures," MPRA Paper 52310, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Meade, Birgit & Rosen, Stacey & Beghin, John, "undated". "A Consistent Food Demand Framework for International Food Security Assessment," Technical Bulletins 262292, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Barnett, William A. & Serletis, Apostolos, 2008. "Consumer preferences and demand systems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 147(2), pages 210-224, December.
    11. West, Sarah E. & Williams, R.C.Roberton III, 2004. "Estimates from a consumer demand system: implications for the incidence of environmental taxes," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 535-558, May.
    12. Franziska Weiss & Timo Boppart, 2013. "Non-homothetic preferences and industry directed technical change," 2013 Meeting Papers 916, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    13. Filippini, M. & Masiero, G. & Moschetti, K., 2009. "Regional consumption of antibiotics: A demand system approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 1389-1397, November.
    14. Gershom Endelani Mwalupaso & Shangao Wang & Sanzidur Rahman & Essiagnon John-Philippe Alavo & Xu Tian, 2019. "Agricultural Informatization and Technical Efficiency in Maize Production in Zambia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    15. Blisard, William Noel & Blaylock, James R., "undated". "Construction of·True Cost of Food Indexes From Estimated Engel Curves," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 270916, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Wahl, Thomas I. & Hayes, Dermot J., "undated". "A Dynamic, Globally Flexible Model Of U.S. Meat Demand," 1989 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 2, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 270672, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Botosaru, Irene & Muris, Chris & Pendakur, Krishna, 2023. "Identification of time-varying transformation models with fixed effects, with an application to unobserved heterogeneity in resource shares," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 576-597.
    18. Herrendorf, Berthold & Rogerson, Richard & Valentinyi, Ákos, 2014. "Growth and Structural Transformation," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 6, pages 855-941, Elsevier.
    19. Simon Alder & Timo Boppart & Andreas Müller, 2022. "A Theory of Structural Change That Can Fit the Data," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(2), pages 160-206, April.
    20. Wu, JunJie & Adams, Richard M., 2002. "Micro Versus Macro Acreage Response Models: Does Site-Specific Information Matter?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(01), pages 1-21, July.
    21. Mittelhammer, Ronald C. & Shi, Hongqi & Wahl, Thomas I., 1996. "Accounting For Aggregation Bias In Almost Ideal Demand Systems," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(2), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:402735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.