IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersab/309723.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Consumer Concerns about Nutrition: Opportunities for the Food Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Frazão, Elizabeth

Abstract

The growing evidence of the link between diet and health has not been lost among consumers in the United States. As awareness of the diet-health link has increased, consumers have changed their diets. Although there is still considerable room for improvement in meeting Federal food-guidance recommendations, nutrition concerns have become an important factor in food choices. Both the food sector and the Federal Government have responded to consumer concerns about nutrition through improvements in the nutrient profile of food products and improved information on food labels. Technological advances in food processing have given the food industry new tools that are likely to accelerate the introduction of tasty healthier foods. Changes in what, where, and how food products are produced present unlimited opportunities for domestic and foreign producers and food manufacturers who can identify, respond to, or create new consumer food desires.

Suggested Citation

  • Frazão, Elizabeth, 1994. "Consumer Concerns about Nutrition: Opportunities for the Food Sector," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309723, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersab:309723
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.309723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/309723/files/aib705.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.309723?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Putnam, Judith Jones & Allshouse, Jane E., 1993. "Food Consumption, Prices, and Expenditures, 1970-92," Statistical Bulletin 154808, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Smallwood, David M. & Blaylock, James R., 1994. "Fiber: Not Enough of a Good Thing?," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 17(1), January.
    3. Gallo, Anthony E., 1992. "Record Number of New Products in 1991," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 15(2), July.
    4. Frazao, Betsy & Cleveland, Linda, 1994. "Diet-Health Awareness About Fat and Cholesterol-Only a Start," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 17(1), January.
    5. Guthrie, Joanne F. & Raper, Nancy, 1992. "Animal Products: Their Contribution to a Balanced Diet," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 15(1), January.
    6. van Ravenswaay, Eileen, 1989. "The Food Industry Responds to Consumers' Pesticide Fears," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 12(3), September.
    7. Kaufman, Phil & Newton, Doris J., 1990. "Retailers Explore Food Safety and Quality Assurance Options," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 13(4), December.
    8. Putnam, Judith Jones, 1994. "American Eating Habits Changing: Part 2 Grains, Vegetables, Fruit, and Sugars," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 17(2), May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. McLean-Meyinsse, Patricia E., 2001. "An Analysis Of Nutritional Label Use In The Southern United States," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 32(1), pages 1-5, March.
    2. J. Kamal Dow, 1996. "Evolución de las preferencias alimentarias en los estados unidos: implicaciones para la agricultura de América latina y el Caribe," Ensayos de Economía 9507, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Medellín.
    3. Schupp, Alvin R. & Gillespie, Jeffrey M. & Reed, Debra, 1998. "Consumer Awareness And Use Of Nutrition Labels On Packaged Fresh Meats: A Pilot Study," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 29(2), pages 1-7, July.
    4. Reed, Debra & Gillespie, Jeffrey M. & Downer, Robert & Schupp, Alvin R., 1999. "Consumer Knowledge Of Selected Nutrient Content Of Nine Fresh Meat Cuts," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 17(2), pages 1-8.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manchester, Alden C., 1992. "Rearranging The Economic Landscape: The Food Marketing Revolution, 1950-91," Agricultural Economic Reports 308263, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Veeman, Michele M. & Unterschultz, James R., 2000. "Pork Market Development Research Project: Market Potential For Alberta'S Pork In Selected U.S. Markets," Project Report Series 24054, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    3. Ravenswaay, Eileen O. van, 1993. "Linkages between Agricultural Marketing and Environmental Policies," Staff Paper Series 201168, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    4. Ranney, Christine K., 1996. "Proceedings Of The Annual Meeting S-216 Regional Project Food Demand And Consumption Behavior," Research Bulletins 122818, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    5. Rimal, Arbindra & Fletcher, Stanley M. & McWatters, Kay H., 2000. "Nutrition Considerations In Food Selection," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 3(1), pages 1-16.
    6. Rafael Cortez & Ben Senauer, 1996. "Taste Changes in the Demand for Food by Demographic Groups in the United States: A Nonparametric Empirical Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 78(2), pages 280-289.
    7. Moon, Wanki & Florkowski, Wojciech J. & A. Resurreccion, Anna V. & Paraskova, Pavlina & R. Beuchat, Larry & Jordanov, Jordan & Chinnan, Manjeet S., 1998. "Consumer concerns about nutritional attributes in a transition economy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 357-369, October.
    8. Chen, Kevin & Ali, Murad & Veeman, Michele & Unterschultz, Jim & Le, Theresa, 2002. "Relative Importance Rankings for Pork Attributes by Asian-Origin Consumers in California: Applying an Ordered Probit Model to a Choice-Based Sample," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(1), pages 67-79, April.
    9. Helen H. Jensen & Steven T. Yen, 1996. "Food Expenditures Away From Home by Type of Meal," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 44(1), pages 67-80, March.
    10. Gallo, Anthony E., 1995. "Are There Too Many New Product Introductions In U.S. Food Marketing?," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 26(1), pages 1-5, February.
    11. J. Kamal Dow, 1996. "Evolución de las preferencias alimentarias en los estados unidos: implicaciones para la agricultura de América latina y el Caribe," Ensayos de Economía 9507, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Medellín.
    12. Frazão, Elizabeth, 1995. "The American Diet: Health and Economic Consequences," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309727, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    13. Nayga, Rodolfo M., 1994. "Effects of Socioeconomic and Demographic Factors on Consumption of Selected Food Nutrients," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 171-182, October.
    14. Rimal, Arbindra & Fletcher, Stanley M., 2003. "Understanding Consumers' Attitude Toward Meat Labels And Meat Consumption Pattern," 2003 Annual Meeting, February 1-5, 2003, Mobile, Alabama 35027, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    15. You, Zhikang & Epperson, James E. & Huang, Chung L., 1996. "A Composite System Demand Analysis For Fresh Fruits And Vegetables In The United States," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 27(3), pages 1-12, October.
    16. Anya M. McGuirk & Warren P. Preston & Amy McCormick, 1990. "Toward the development of marketing strategies for food safety attributes," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 6(4), pages 297-308.
    17. Hui, Jianguo & McLean-Meyinsse, Patricia E. & Jones, Dewitt, 1995. "An Empirical Investigation Of Importance Ratings Of Meat Attributes By Louisiana And Texas Consumers," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-8, December.
    18. Powers, Nicholas J. & Heifner, Richard G., 1993. "Federal Grade Standards for Fresh Produce: Linkages to Pesticide Use," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309690, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    19. McLaughlin, Edward W. & Hawkes, Gerard F. & Park, Kristen & Perosio, Debra J., 1995. "Supermarket Bakery Consumers: Attitudes, Preferences, Behaviors," Research Bulletins 122993, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    20. Lois Morton & Ella Bitto & Mary Oakland & Mary Sand, 2008. "Accessing food resources: Rural and urban patterns of giving and getting food," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 25(1), pages 107-119, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersab:309723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.