IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/333127.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impacts of the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard on Commodity and Food Prices

Author

Listed:
  • Taheripour, Farzad
  • Baumes, Harry
  • Tyner, Wally Taheripour, Farzad

Abstract

When a government imposes a regulation, it usually indicates that the market would not produce the socially desired outcome. A good example is the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). This paper examines the extent to which biofuel production has been driven over time by the RFS and the extent to which it was driven by market changes unforeseen at the time of RFS passage. While the RFS has played a critical role in providing a secure environment to produce and use more biofuels, it was not the only factor that encouraged the biofuel industry to grow. To some extent, at least in the 2000s, the non-RFS biofuel policies and market forces have also influenced the rapid expansion in biofuels. Over the past decade, many papers have studied the economic impacts of biofuel production and policy. The existing literature has failed to properly quantify the impacts and contributions of each of these drivers separately. This paper develops short and long run economic analyses, using Partial Economic (PE) and Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) models, to differentiate the economic impacts of the RFS from other drivers that have helped biofuels to grow. Results show: i) the bulk of the ethanol production prior to 2012 was driven by what was happening in the national and global markets for energy and agricultural commodities and by the federal and sometimes state incentives for biofuel production; ii) the medium to long run price impacts of biofuel production were not large; iii) Due to biofuel production, regardless of the drivers, real crop prices have increased between 1.1% and 5.5% in 2004-11 with only one-tenth of the price increases were assigned to the RFS, iv) For 2011-16, the long run price impacts of biofuels were less than the time period of 2004-11, as in the second period biofuel production increased at much slower rate, v) Biofuel production, regardless of the drivers, has increased US annual farm incomes by $10.6 billion between 2002-16 with 28% share for the RFS.

Suggested Citation

  • Taheripour, Farzad & Baumes, Harry & Tyner, Wally Taheripour, Farzad, 2019. "Impacts of the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard on Commodity and Food Prices," Conference papers 333127, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/333127/files/10238.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian Wright, 2014. "Global Biofuels: Key to the Puzzle of Grain Market Behavior," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 28(1), pages 73-98, Winter.
    2. Wallace E. Tyner & Frank J. Dooley & Daniela Viteri, 2010. "Alternative Pathways for Fulfilling the RFS Mandate," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 93(2), pages 465-472.
    3. repec:cdl:agrebk:qt61t114zb is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Irwin, Scott, . "Revisiting the Value of Ethanol in E10 Gasoline Blends," farmdoc daily, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, vol. 9(60).
    5. Taheripour, Farzad & Wally Tyner, 2018. "Impacts of Possible Chinese Protection on US Soybeans," GTAP Working Papers 5654, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    6. Christina Korting & Harry de Gorter & David R Just, 2019. "Who Will Pay for Increasing Biofuel Mandates? Incidence of the Renewable Fuel Standard Given a Binding Blend Wall," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 101(2), pages 492-506.
    7. Wallace E. Tyner, 2010. "The integration of energy and agricultural markets," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(s1), pages 193-201, November.
    8. Abbott, Philip C. & Hurt, Christopher & Tyner, Wallace E., 2009. "What's Driving Food Prices? March 2009 Update," Issue Reports 48495, Farm Foundation.
    9. Taheripour, Farzad & Wally Tyner, 2011. "Introducing First and Second Generation Biofuels into GTAP Data Base version 7," GTAP Research Memoranda 3477, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    10. Mitchell, Donald, 2008. "A note on rising food prices," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4682, The World Bank.
    11. repec:cdl:agrebk:qt11715438 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Thomas W. Hertel & Wallace E. Tyner & Dileep K. Birur, 2010. "The Global Impacts of Biofuel Mandates," The Energy Journal, , vol. 31(1), pages 75-100, January.
    13. Taheripour, Farzad & Wally Tyner, 2018. "Impacts of Possible Chinese Protection on US Soybeans," GTAP Working Papers 5654, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    14. Song-Zan Chiou-Wei, Sheng-Hung Chen, and Zhen Zhu, 2019. "Energy and Agricultural Commodity Markets Interaction: An Analysis of Crude Oil, Natural Gas, Corn, Soybean, and Ethanol Prices," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    15. Colin A. Carter & Gordon C. Rausser & Aaron Smith, 2017. "Commodity Storage and the Market Effects of Biofuel Policies," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(4), pages 1027-1055.
    16. Hertel, Thomas, 1997. "Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and applications," GTAP Books, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, number 7685, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Taheripour, Farzad & Baumes, Harry S. & Tyner, Wallace E., 2020. "Economic impacts of the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard: An ex-post evaluation," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304252, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Gilbert, Christopher L. & Mugera, Harriet K., "undated". "The effects of US biofuels policy: A structural break analysis of the WTI pass-through to the corn price," 91st Annual Conference, April 24-26, 2017, Royal Dublin Society, Dublin, Ireland 258646, Agricultural Economics Society.
    3. Helmut Herwartz & Alberto Saucedo, 2020. "Food–oil volatility spillovers and the impact of distinct biofuel policies on price uncertainties on feedstock markets," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(3), pages 387-402, May.
    4. Yao, Guolin & Zhang, Xin & Davidson, Eric & Taheripour, Farzad & Tyner, Wallace E., 2020. "The Environmental Consequences of a Weakening US-China Crop Trade Relationship," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304646, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Christopher L. Gilbert & Harriet Kasidi Mugera, 2020. "Competitive Storage, Biofuels and the Corn Price," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(2), pages 384-411, June.
    6. Yao, Guolin & Zhang, Xin & Davidson, Eric & Taheripour, Farzad & Tyner, Wally, 2020. "The environmental consequences of a weakening US-China crop trade relationship," Conference papers 333191, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Abbott, Philip C. & Hurt, Christopher & Tyner, Wallace E., 2011. "What’s Driving Food Prices in 2011?," Issue Reports 112927, Farm Foundation.
    8. Linjie Wang & Jean‐Paul Chavas & Jian Li, 2024. "Dynamic linkages in agricultural and energy markets: A quantile impulse response approach," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(4), pages 639-676, July.
    9. Christophe Gouel & Nicolas Legrand, 2025. "The role of storage in commodity markets: Indirect inference based on grain data," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 16(2), pages 705-747, May.
    10. Cheng, Sheng & Cao, Yan, 2019. "On the relation between global food and crude oil prices: An empirical investigation in a nonlinear framework," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 422-432.
    11. Mensi, Walid & Hammoudeh, Shawkat & Nguyen, Duc Khuong & Yoon, Seong-Min, 2014. "Dynamic spillovers among major energy and cereal commodity prices," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 225-243.
    12. Dalheimer, Bernhard & Herwartz, Helmut & Lange, Alexander, 2021. "The threat of oil market turmoils to food price stability in Sub-Saharan Africa," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    13. Nelson Villoria & Rachael Garrett & Florian Gollnow & Kimberly Carlson, 2022. "Leakage does not fully offset soy supply-chain efforts to reduce deforestation in Brazil," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    14. Chepeliev, Maksym & Wally Tyner & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2018. "How U.S. Agriculture Will Fare Under the USMCA and Retaliatory Tariffs," GTAP Working Papers 5670, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    15. Banse, M. & Sorda, G., . "Impact of Different Biofuel Policy Options on Agricultural Production and Land Use in Germany," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 45.
    16. Ujjayant Chakravorty & Marie‐Hélène Hubert & Beyza Ural Marchand, 2019. "Food for fuel: The effect of the US biofuel mandate on poverty in India," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 10(3), pages 1153-1193, July.
    17. repec:cdl:agrebk:qt61t114zb is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Kafle, Kashi R. & Pullabhotla, Hemant K, "undated". "Food for the Stomach or Fuel for the Tank: What do Prices Tell Us?," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170273, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Kristoufek, Ladislav & Janda, Karel & Zilberman, David, 2012. "Correlations between biofuels and related commodities before and during the food crisis: A taxonomy perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1380-1391.
    20. Palazzi, Rafael Baptista & Meira, Erick & Klotzle, Marcelo Cabus, 2022. "The sugar-ethanol-oil nexus in Brazil: Exploring the pass-through of international commodity prices to national fuel prices," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    21. Ji Yong Lee & Allen Featherstone & Rodolfo M. Nayga & Doo Bong Han, 2019. "The Long-Run and Short-Run Effects of Ethanol Production on U.S. Beef Producers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.