IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/332388.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Imperfect labour mobility in a CGE model: Does factor specific productivity matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Flaig, Dorothee
  • Grethe, Harald
  • McDonald, Scott

Abstract

CGE models usually make extreme assumptions about labour mobility: labour is either perfectly mobile between sectors or fixed to a sector. With perfect mobility of labour, simulations lead to reallocation of labour among different sectors of the economy. The labour productivity can vary strongly between different sectors, reflecting the fact that labour of a specific type, e.g. unskilled workers, may not be homogenous. When labour moves from less to more productive sectors, an economy experiences a de facto increase in labour endowments, this obviously effects the results and becomes interesting when questioning the sector specificity of labour productivity. Separating the impacts of implicit increases in labour endowments from other impacts arising from labour reallocation is therefore important for result interpretation. For this purpose this study uses a CGE model in which labour reallocation is imperfect with a migration function governing the movement between sectors. We thus control the physical flows of labour which is a precondition to allow for depicting factor specific productivity. Two scenarios are run in order to analyse the size and relevance of the productivity, effect: the first scenario causing movement from less productive to more productive industries, the second scenario induces movement of labour from more productive to less productive industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Flaig, Dorothee & Grethe, Harald & McDonald, Scott, 2013. "Imperfect labour mobility in a CGE model: Does factor specific productivity matter?," Conference papers 332388, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332388/files/6565.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Figura & William Wascher, 2010. "The Causes and Consequences of Sectoral Reallocation: Evidence from the Early 21st Century," Business Economics, Palgrave Macmillan;National Association for Business Economics, vol. 45(1), pages 49-68, January.
    2. Bruce C. Fallick, 1996. "A Review of the Recent Empirical Literature on Displaced Workers," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 50(1), pages 5-16, October.
    3. Li, Liang & Taheripour, Farzad & Preckel, Paul V. & Tyner, Wallace E., 2012. "Improvement of GTAP Cropland Constant Elasticity of Transformation Nesting Structure," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124704, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Jesus Felipe, 1999. "Total factor productivity growth in East Asia: A critical survey," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 1-41.
    5. H Poirson, 2001. "The impact of intersectoral labour reallocation on economic growth," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 10(1), pages 37-63.
    6. Hertel, Thomas, 1997. "Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and applications," GTAP Books, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, number 7685, December.
    7. Stefan Boeters & Luc Savard, 2011. "The Labour Market in CGE Models," Cahiers de recherche 11-20, Departement d'économique de l'École de gestion à l'Université de Sherbrooke.
    8. Ernesto Valenzuela & Kym Anderson & Thomas Hertel, 2008. "Impacts of trade reform: sensitivity of model results to key assumptions," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 395-420, February.
    9. Pack, Howard, 1993. "Productivity and industrial development in sub-Saharan Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Golub, Alla & Hertel, Thomas & Lee, Huey-Lin & Ramankutty, Navin, 2006. "Modeling Land Supply and Demand in the Long Run," Conference papers 331559, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    11. Elena Ianchovichina & Will Martin, 2004. "Impacts of China's Accession to the World Trade Organization," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 18(1), pages 3-27.
    12. Shutes, Lindsay & Rothe, Andrea & Banse, Martin, 2012. "Factor Markets in Applied Equilibrium Models: The current state and planned extensions towards an improved presentation of factor markets in agriculture," Working papers 122851, Factor Markets, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    13. Ruslana R. Palatnik & Fabio Eboli & Andrea Ghermandi & Iddo Kan & Mickey Rapaport-Rom & Mordechai Shechter, 2011. "Integration Of General And Partial Equilibrium Agricultural Land-Use Transformation For The Analysis Of Climate Change In The Mediterranean," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 2(04), pages 275-299.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dorothee Flaig & Harald Grethe & Scott McDonald & Khalid Siddig, 2012. "Intersectoral factor movements: do adjustment costs matter for welfare?," EcoMod2012 4418, EcoMod.
    2. Ianchovichina, Elena, 2004. "Trade policy analysis in the presence of duty drawbacks," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 353-371, April.
    3. Francesco Bosello & Lorenza Campagnolo & Raffaello Cervigni & Fabio Eboli, 2018. "Climate Change and Adaptation: The Case of Nigerian Agriculture," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 69(4), pages 787-810, April.
    4. Anderson, Kym & Huang, Jikun & Ianchovichina, Elena, 2004. "Will China's WTO accession worsen farm household incomes?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 443-456.
    5. Elena Ianchovichina & Maros Ivanic, 2016. "Economic Effects of the Syrian War and the Spread of the Islamic State on the Levant," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(10), pages 1584-1627, October.
    6. Anderson, Kym & Valenzuela, Ernesto & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2009. "Welfare and Poverty Effects of Global Agricultural and Trade Policies Using the Linkage Model," Agricultural Distortions Working Paper Series 52785, World Bank.
    7. Betina Dimaranan & Elena Ianchovichina & Will Martin, 2009. "How will growth in China and India affect the world economy?," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 145(3), pages 551-571, October.
    8. Elena Ianchovichina & Terrie Walmsley, 2005. "Impact of China's WTO Accession on East Asia," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 23(2), pages 261-277, April.
    9. L. Alan Winters & Shahid Yusuf, 2007. "Dancing with the Giants: China, India, and the Global Economy," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6632, December.
    10. Banse, Martin & Rothe, Andrea & Tabeau, Andrzej & Meijl, Hans van & Woltjer, Geert, 2013. "Will improved access to capital dampen the need for more agricultural land? A CGE analysis of agricultural capital markets and world-wide biofuel policies," Working papers 155706, Factor Markets, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    11. Shin, Sangho & Balistreri, Edward J., 2022. "The other trade war: Quantifying the Korea–Japan trade dispute," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    12. Anderson, Kym & Martin, Will & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2013. "Estimating Effects of Price-Distorting Policies Using Alternative Distortions Databases," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 877-931, Elsevier.
    13. Thomas W. Hertel & Jeffrey J. Reimer, 2006. "Predicting the Poverty Impacts of Trade Reform," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 2, May.
    14. Ravallion, Martin, 2006. "Looking beyond averages in the trade and poverty debate," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 1374-1392, August.
    15. Carrico, Caitlyn & Tsigas, Marinos, 2014. "Enriching U.S. labor results in a multi-regional CGE model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 268-281.
    16. Cerra, Valerie & Rivera, Sandra A. & Saxena, Sweta Chaman, 2004. "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon: What are the Consequences of China’s WTO Entry for India’s Trade?," Conference papers 331297, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    17. Kym Anderson, 2005. "Agricultural trade reform and poverty reduction in developing countries," Chapters, in: Sisira Jayasuriya (ed.), Trade Policy Reforms and Development, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Ianchovichina, Elena, 2003. "GTAP-DD: A Model for Analyzing Trade Reforms in the Presence of Duty Drawbacks," GTAP Technical Papers 1192, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    19. Cheong, David & Sonnenschein, Xiaohong, 2012. "Trade Liberalization and Employment in Indonesia: A CGE Analysis," Conference papers 332278, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    20. Dandres, Thomas & Gaudreault, Caroline & Tirado-Seco, Pablo & Samson, Réjean, 2012. "Macroanalysis of the economic and environmental impacts of a 2005–2025 European Union bioenergy policy using the GTAP model and life cycle assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1180-1192.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.