IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/midasp/11556.html

Transgenic Crops And The Environment: Missing Markets And Public Role

Author

Listed:
  • Batie, Sandra S.
  • Ervin, David E.

Abstract

The rapidity of change has left scant opportunity for investigation of the consequences of biotechnology adoption on long-term ecosystem or economic system functioning. Economic theory suggests that, if the "Biotechnology Revolution" is left to market forces alone,there will be neglected public goods. Theory and limited empirical evidence suggests that there are significant incentives for private firms to discount and neglect certain environmental impacts and to develop products that meet only the needs of those able and willing to pay. Negative distributional impacts on rural societies and economies will not normally enter the private calculus nor will the long-term problems of insect and plant resistance. Thus, there is a strong case for enhanced public roles with respect to the use of transgenic crops. The adoption of the precautionary approach in public policies addressing transgenic crops is one alternative to better reflect public concerns.

Suggested Citation

  • Batie, Sandra S. & Ervin, David E., 2000. "Transgenic Crops And The Environment: Missing Markets And Public Role," Staff Paper Series 11556, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:midasp:11556
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.11556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/11556/files/sp99-74.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.11556?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandra S. Batie & David B. Schweikhardt, 1995. "Demosclerosis: Implications for Environmental and Agricultural Policy Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 77(5), pages 1126-1127.
    2. Barry J. Barnett & Brandon O. Gibson, 1999. "Economic Challenges of Transgenic Crops: The Case of Cotton," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 647-659, September.
    3. Bryan Hubbell & Rick Welsh, 1998. "Transgenic crops: Engineering a more sustainable agriculture?," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 15(1), pages 43-56, March.
    4. Ollinger, Michael & Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge, 1998. "Innovation and Regulation in the Pesticide Industry," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 15-27, April.
    5. Richard E. Just & Darrell L. Hueth, 1993. "Multimarket Exploitation: The Case of Biotechnology and Chemicals," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 75(4), pages 936-945.
    6. William P. Browne & Schweikhardt David B., 1995. "Demosclerosis: Implications for Agricultural Policy," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 77(5), pages 1128-1134.
    7. Deepak Saxena & Saul Flores & G. Stotzky, 1999. "Insecticidal toxin in root exudates from Bt corn," Nature, Nature, vol. 402(6761), pages 480-480, December.
    8. David E. Ervin & Andrew Schmitz, 1996. "A New Era of Environmental Management in Agriculture?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 78(5), pages 1198-1206.
    9. Stephen Clark, J. & Carlson, Gerald A., 1990. "Testing for common versus private property: The case of pesticide resistance," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 45-60, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bryan Hubbell & Rick Welsh, 1998. "Transgenic crops: Engineering a more sustainable agriculture?," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 15(1), pages 43-56, March.
    2. Ball, V. Eldon & Lovell, C.A. Knox & Luu, H. & Nehring, Richard F., 2004. "Incorporating Environmental Impacts in the Measurement of Agricultural Productivity Growth," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 29(3), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Ragnar E. Löfstedt & Baruch Fischhoff & Ilya R. Fischhoff, 2002. "Precautionary principles: general definitions and specific applications to genetically modified organisms," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(3), pages 381-407.
    4. repec:isu:genstf:2000010108000013359 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Schimmelpfennig, David E. & Pray, Carl E. & Brennan, Margaret F., 2004. "The impact of seed industry concentration on innovation: a study of US biotech market leaders," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 157-167, March.
    6. Batie, Sandra S. & Swinton, Scott M. & Schulz, Mary A., 1999. "Fqpa Implementation To Reduce Pesticide Residue Risks: Part I: Agricultural Producer Concerns," Staff Paper Series 11813, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    7. Demont, Matty & Tollens, Eric, 1999. "The Economics Of Agricultural Biotechnology: Historical And Analytical Framework," Working Papers 31845, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.
    8. Mallawaarachchi, Thilak, 2002. "Assessing Best-Practice Environmental Management Options at the decision scale: a model for technology choice and policy analysis," 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia 125136, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    9. Hudson, Darren & Jones, Tom, 2001. "Willingness to Plant Identity Preserved Crops: The Case of Mississippi Soybeans," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(3), pages 475-485, December.
    10. Wallace E. Huffman & Richard E. Just, 1999. "The organization of agricultural research in western developed countries," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 21(1), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Ollinger, Michael & Moore, Danna L. & Chandran, Ram, 2004. "Meat And Poultry Plants' Food Safety Investments: Survey Findings," Technical Bulletins 33559, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    12. Swinton, Scott M. & Batie, Sandra S. & Schulz, Mary A., 1999. "Fqpa Implementation To Reduce Pesticide Residue Risks: Part Ii: Implementation Alternatives And Strategies," Staff Paper Series 11488, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    13. Jeremy Foltz & Bradford Barham & Kwansoo Kim, 2000. "Universities and agricultural biotechnology patent production," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(1), pages 82-95.
    14. Frisvold, George B. & Agnew, G. Ken & Baker, Paul, 2002. "Biorational Insecticide Adoption And Conventional Insecticide Use: A Simultaneous, Limited Dependent Variable Model," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19779, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    15. Kazmierczak, Richard F., Jr. & Paxton, Kenneth W., 1997. "Technical Change And New Directions For Cotton Production," Station Bulletins 31683, Louisiana State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness.
    16. Zilberman, David & Yarkin, Cherisa & Heiman, Amir, 1997. "Agricultural Biotechnology: Economic and International Implications," 1997 Conference, August 10-16, 1997, Sacramento, California 197037, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Yoo, Do-il, 2012. "Individual and Social Learning in Bio-technology Adoption: The Case of GM Corn in the U.S," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124975, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Terrance Hurley & Silvia Secchi & Bruce Babcock & Richard Hellmich, 2002. "Managing the Risk of European Corn Borer Resistance to Bt Corn," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 22(4), pages 537-558, August.
    19. Sun, Huichun & Hurley, Terrance M. & Dentzman, Katherine & Ervin, David E. & Everman, Wesley & Frisvold, George B. & Gunsolus, Jeffrey & Norsworthy, Jason & Owen, Micheal, "undated". "Economic and Behavioral Drivers of Herbicide Resistance Management in the U.S," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258417, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Giannakas, Konstantinos, 2001. "The Economics Of Intellectual Property Rights Under Imperfect Enforcement: Developing Countries, Biotechnology And The Trips Agreement," EPTD Discussion Papers 16063, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    21. Giannakas, Konstantinos, 2001. "The economics of intellectual property rights under imperfect enforcement: developing countries, biotechnology, and the TRIPs agreement," EPTD discussion papers 80, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:midasp:11556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/damsuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.