IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae15/211915.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What determines suppliers' intensity of participation in the EU School Fruit Scheme

Author

Listed:
  • von Germeten, Jan-Paul
  • Hartmann, Monika

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the determinants of suppliers’ intensity of participation in the EU school fruit scheme (SFS) based on the example of the SFS in the German federal state North Rhine-Westphalia. In 2013/2014 approx. 100 suppliers including many agricultural enterprises or farm shops took part in a telephone survey. The data was processed by a factor analysis. Multivariate regression analyses were used to examine the determinants of intensity of participation. The findings reveal that the intensity of participation is influenced by the buyer-supplier-relationship, performance indicators and different types of costs.

Suggested Citation

  • von Germeten, Jan-Paul & Hartmann, Monika, 2015. "What determines suppliers' intensity of participation in the EU School Fruit Scheme," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211915, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae15:211915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/211915
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hinson, Roger A., 2005. "Responses to Industry Concentration by Small- and Medium Sized Fruit and Vegetable Wholesalers," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 36(01), March.
    2. Höllmer, Jan-Paul & Hartmann, Monika, 2013. "EU School Fruit Scheme: Strengthening Local Businesses," 2013 International European Forum, February 18-22, 2013, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 164755, International European Forum on Innovation and System Dynamics in Food Networks.
    3. Hikaru Hanawa Peterson & Theresa Selfa & Rhonda Janke, 2010. "Barriers and Opportunities for Sustainable Food Systems in Northeastern Kansas," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 2(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Charles Dhanaraj & Marjorie A Lyles & H Kevin Steensma & Laszlo Tihanyi, 2004. "Managing tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in IJVs: the role of relational embeddedness and the impact on performance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 35(5), pages 428-442, September.
    5. Betty Izumi & D. Wright & Michael Hamm, 2010. "Farm to school programs: exploring the role of regionally-based food distributors in alternative agrifood networks," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 27(3), pages 335-350, September.
    6. Jessica Bagdonis & C. Hinrichs & Kai Schafft, 2009. "The emergence and framing of farm-to-school initiatives: civic engagement, health and local agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 26(1), pages 107-119, March.
    7. David Conner & Benjamin King & Jane Kolodinsky & Erin Roche & Christopher Koliba & Amy Trubek, 2012. "You can know your school and feed it too: Vermont farmers’ motivations and distribution practices in direct sales to school food services," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 29(3), pages 321-332, September.
    8. Salunke, Sandeep & Weerawardena, Jay & McColl-Kennedy, Janet R., 2013. "Competing through service innovation: The role of bricolage and entrepreneurship in project-oriented firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1085-1097.
    9. Patricia Allen & Julie Guthman, 2006. "From “old school” to “farm-to-school”: Neoliberalization from the ground up," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 23(4), pages 401-415, December.
    10. Skuras, Dimitris & Tsegenidi, Kyriaki & Tsekouras, Kostas, 2008. "Product innovation and the decision to invest in fixed capital assets: Evidence from an SME survey in six European Union member states," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1778-1789, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries; International Development;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae15:211915. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.