IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/gadadp/260788.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Stand des Strukturwandels in der ökologischen Landwirtschaft

Author

Listed:
  • Würriehausen, Nadine
  • Lakner, Sebastian

Abstract

[Einleitung ...] Aufgrund dieser Entwicklungen, wird nachfolgend untersucht, ob Ökobetriebe ebenfalls einem ähnlichen Muster des Strukturwandel ausgesetzt sind wie konventionelle Betriebe oder ob der Biomarkt als Nischenmarkt immer noch eine gewisse Eigendynamik aufweist und Betriebe den typischen ökonomischen Anreizen nicht im gleichem Maße folgen (müssen) wie dies bei konventionellen Betrieben zu beobachten ist. In diesem Beitrag wird daher untersucht, wie sich Ökobetriebe in Deutschland im Detail entwickelt haben und ob Parallelen zum Strukturwandel der konventionellen Landwirtschaft zu erkennen sind. Dazu werden zunächst verschiedene konkurrierende Theorien des Strukturwandels in der (konventionellen) Landwirtschaft vorgestellt und mit der Entwicklung der ökologischen Landwirtschaft verbunden. Das Ziel des Beitrages ist es, eine Einschätzung zu geben, ob die Diskussion über die Entwicklung von ökologischen Betrieben ebenfalls unter dem Titel „Wachsen oder Weichen“ geführt werden müsste, da ökologisch wirtschaftende Landwirte durch die die Entwicklungen auf dem Ökomarkt genötigt werden sich konventionellen Betriebsstrukturen anzupassen, um weiterhin wirtschaftlich erfolgreich am Markt bestehen zu können. Der Beitrag gliedert sich wie folgt: in Kapitel 2 werden Theorien zum Strukturwandel in der Landwirtschaft vorgestellt und mit Hinblick auf die Entwicklung des ökologischen Landbaus diskutiert. Nachdem im Kapitel 3 die Datengrundlage vorgestellt wurde, erfolgt im anschließenden Kapitel 4 die Analyse der Betriebsstrukturen sowie der Einkommenssituation. In Kapitel 5 werden die Ergebnisse zusammenfassend dargestellt. Das letzte Kapitel gibt einen Ausblick auf weitere Forschungsfragen.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Würriehausen, Nadine & Lakner, Sebastian, 2015. "Stand des Strukturwandels in der ökologischen Landwirtschaft," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 260788, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:gadadp:260788
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.260788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/260788/files/DiskussionspapierStrukturwandelFinal.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/260788/files/DiskussionspapierStrukturwandelFinal.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.260788?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kuhnert, Heike & Behrens, Gesine & Hamm, Ulrich & Müller, Henriette & Nieberg, Hiltrud & Sanders, Jürn & Strohm, Renate, 2013. "Ausstiege aus dem ökologischen Landbau: Umfang - Gründe - Handlungsoptionen," Thünen Reports 3, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    2. Brandes, Wilhelm, 2000. "Wettbewerb in der Landwirtschaft aus Sicht der evolutorischen Ökonomik," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 49(08).
    3. Cowan, Robin & Gunby, Philip, 1996. "Sprayed to Death: Path Dependence, Lock-In and Pest Control Strategies," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 106(436), pages 521-542, May.
    4. Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2004. "Pfadabhängigkeit als Forschungsprogramm für die Agrarökonomie," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 53(03), pages 1-12.
    5. Kuhnert, Heike & Behrens, Gesine & Hamm, Ulrich & Mueller, Henriette & Nieberg, Hiltrud & Strohm, Renate & Sanders, Juern, 2013. "Ausstiege aus dem ökologischen Landbau: Umfang – Gründe – Handlungsoptionen," Thünen Report 177307, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David A. Hennessy, 2006. "On Monoculture and the Structure of Crop Rotations," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(4), pages 900-914.
    2. Ciarli, Tommaso & Ràfols, Ismael, 2019. "The relation between research priorities and societal demands: The case of rice," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 949-967.
    3. Stavins, Robert & Jaffe, Adam & Newell, Richard, 2000. "Technological Change and the Environment," Working Paper Series rwp00-002, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    4. John Kemp & Ted Wilson, 1999. "Monetary Regime Transformation: The scramble to gold in the late nineteenth century," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 125-149.
    5. Jacquet, Florence & Butault, Jean-Pierre & Guichard, Laurence, 2011. "An economic analysis of the possibility of reducing pesticides in French field crops," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(9), pages 1638-1648, July.
    6. Konstantinos Chatzimichael & Margarita Genius & Vangelis Tzouvelekas, 2015. "Health-Damaging Inputs, Workers' Health Status and Productivity Measurement," Working Papers 1505, University of Crete, Department of Economics.
    7. Ramani, Shyama V. & Thutupalli, Ajay, 2015. "Emergence of controversy in technology transitions: Green Revolution and Bt cotton in India," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 198-212.
    8. Magrini, Marie-Benoit & Anton, Marc & Cholez, Célia & Corre-Hellou, Guenaelle & Duc, Gérard & Jeuffroy, Marie-Hélène & Meynard, Jean-Marc & Pelzer, Elise & Voisin, Anne-Sophie & Walrand, Stéphane, 2016. "Why are grain-legumes rarely present in cropping systems despite their environmental and nutritional benefits? Analyzing lock-in in the French agrifood system," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 152-162.
    9. Sibylle Bui & Ionara Costa & Olivier De Schutter & Tom Dedeurwaerdere & Marek Hudon & Marlene Feyereisen, 2019. "Systemic ethics and inclusive governance: two key prerequisites for sustainability transitions of agri-food systems," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(2), pages 277-288, June.
    10. L. Toma & A. P. Barnes & L.-A. Sutherland & S. Thomson & F. Burnett & K. Mathews, 2018. "Impact of information transfer on farmers’ uptake of innovative crop technologies: a structural equation model applied to survey data," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 864-881, August.
    11. Benjamin Blumenstein & Torsten Siegmeier & Carsten Bruckhaus & Victor Anspach & Detlev Möller, 2015. "Integrated Bioenergy and Food Production—A German Survey on Structure and Developments of Anaerobic Digestion in Organic Farming Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-24, August.
    12. Davis, Rex & Harrison, Stephen R., 1999. "Community Action and Pest Control," 1999 Conference (43th), January 20-22, 1999, Christchurch, New Zealand 123800, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    13. Elisabetta Magnani & Adeline Tubb, 2012. "Green R&D, Technology Spillovers, and Market Uncertainty: An Empirical Investigation," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 88(4), pages 685-709.
    14. Bhattarai, Charan Raj & Kwong, Caleb C.Y. & Tasavori, Misagh, 2019. "Market orientation, market disruptiveness capability and social enterprise performance: An empirical study from the United Kingdom," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 47-60.
    15. Marin, Anabel & Stubrin, Lilia & van Zwanenberg, Patrick, 2023. "Technological lock-in in action: Appraisal and policy commitment in Argentina's seed sector," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    16. Kettunen, Janne & Bunn, Derek W., 2016. "Risk induced resource dependency in capacity investments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 914-924.
    17. Béné, Christophe, 2022. "Why the Great Food Transformation may not happen – A deep-dive into our food systems’ political economy, controversies and politics of evidence," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    18. Abhijit Sharma & Alastair Bailey & Iain Fraser, 2011. "Technology Adoption and Pest Control Strategies Among UK Cereal Farmers: Evidence from Parametric and Nonparametric Count Data Models," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 73-92, February.
    19. Lybbert, Travis J. & Magnan, Nicholas & Gubler, W. Douglas, 2010. "Powdery Mildew Risk And Forecasting In Wine Grapes: Do Growers Change Risk Management Strategies In Response To Disease Forecasts?," 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado 61745, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Albert Faber & Koen Frenken, 2008. "Models in evolutionary economics and environmental policy: Towards an evolutionary environmental economics," Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) working paper series 08-15, Utrecht University, Department of Innovation Studies, revised Apr 2008.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gadadp:260788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iagoede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.