IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aesc11/108780.html

Activity level, emission intensity, and optimal GHG abatement policy: An application to Norwegian agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Blandford, David
  • Gaasland, Ivar
  • Vardal, Erling

Abstract

Despite the failure of the U.N. Copenhagen climate conference in December 2009 efforts are continuing to reach agreement on binding global commitments on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. At the same time, efforts are still underway to conclude the Doha Round of trade negotiations through the World Trade Organization (WTO). Both of these agreements could have a significant impact on the level of activity in agriculture and the GHG emissions that it generates. In this paper we explore strategies to comply with both trade liberalization and GHG emission reduction commitments. We examine the implications of trade liberalization and a carbon tax, both of which affect agricultural output, as means of achieving emission reductions. We emphasize two diametrically different responses to a carbon tax. One adaptation is to change the way agricultural commodities are produced, i.e., choosing less polluting techniques, which we argue will require more land per unit of output. The second response is to use agricultural land for carbon sequestration purposes (offsets), e.g., for perennial grasses or forestry. We show that when an offset option is introduced, production intensity tends to increase, such that emissions per unit of output rise. The theoretical results are illustrated by using a partial equilibrium model of the Norwegian agricultural sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Blandford, David & Gaasland, Ivar & Vardal, Erling, 2011. "Activity level, emission intensity, and optimal GHG abatement policy: An application to Norwegian agriculture," 85th Annual Conference, April 18-20, 2011, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 108780, Agricultural Economics Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aesc11:108780
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.108780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/108780/files/3Blandford_Gaasland_Vardal.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.108780?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruce A. McCarl & Thomas H. Spreen, 1980. "Price Endogenous Mathematical Programming As a Tool for Sector Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 62(1), pages 87-102.
    2. Orden,David & Blandford,David & Josling,Tim (ed.), 2011. "WTO Disciplines on Agricultural Support," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107005440, January.
    3. Rolf Jens Brunstad & Ivar Gaasland & Erling Vardal, 2005. "Multifunctionality of agriculture: an inquiry into the complementarity between landscape preservation and food security," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 32(4), pages 469-488, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khanna, Neha, 2013. "Output, emissions, and technology: Some thoughts," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 284-286.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blandford, David & Gaasland, Ivar & Vårdal, Erling, 2011. "Interaction between trade liberalization and climate change policy: an application to Norwegian agriculture," Working Papers in Economics 10/11, University of Bergen, Department of Economics, revised 01 Dec 2011.
    2. Gaasland, Ivar, 2009. "Agriculture versus fish - Norway in WTO," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 393-397, August.
    3. Liu, Karen, 1980. "Multiple Crop Supply Component Of The World Grains, Oilseeds, And Livestock Model," 1980 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 278876, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Gallagher, Paul W. & Shapouri, Hosein & Price, Jeffrey, 2006. "Welfare maximization, pricing, and allocation with a product performance or environmental quality standard: Illustration for the gasoline and additives market," ISU General Staff Papers 200606010700001452, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    5. Oliver, Anthony & Khanna, Madhu, 2013. "Renewable Energy Policies for the Electricity, Transportation, and Agricultural Sectors: Complements or Substitutes," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150406, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. McCarl, Bruce A., 1992. "Mathematical Programming For Resource Policy Appraisal Under Multiple Objectives," Working Papers 11888, Environmental and Natural Resources Policy Training Project.
    7. Williams, R. Lynn & Dillion, Carl R. & McCarl, Bruce A., 1992. "An Economic Investigation of Edwards Aquifer Water Use Tradeoffs," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 321395, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    8. Onal, Hayri & Chen, Xiaoguang & Khanna, Madhu & Huang, Haixiao, 2009. "Mathematical Programming Modeling of Agricultural Supply Response," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49469, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Xiaoyong CAO & Chih-Chun KUNG & Yuelong WANG, 2017. "An environmental and economic evaluation of carbon sequestration from pyrolysis and biochar application in China," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(12), pages 569-578.
    10. Simla Tokgoz & Danielle Alencar Parente Torres & David Laborde & Jikun Huang, 2014. "The role of U.S., China, Brazil's agricultural and trade policies on global food supply and demand," FOODSECURE Working papers 19, LEI Wageningen UR.
    11. Cruz Ferro-Vázquez & Rebeca Blanco-Rotea & Jorge Sanjurjo-Sánchez & Sonia García-Rodríguez & Marco V. García Quintela, 2021. "Territories of Faith: 1000 Years of Landscape Multifunctionality in Santa Mariña de Augas Santas (NW Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, September.
    12. Qenani-Petrela, Eivis & Noel, Jay E. & Mastin, Thomas, 2007. "A Benefit Transfer Approach to the Estimation of Agro-Ecosystems Services Benefits: A Case Study of Kern County, California," Research Project Reports 121605, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California Institute for the Study of Specialty Crops.
    13. Das, Prantika & Gundimeda, Haripriya, 2021. "Economic Evaluation of Achieving Biofuel Mandate through Advanced Biofuels in Developing Country: Case of India," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315355, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Kym Anderson & Ernesto Valenzuela, 2021. "What impact are subsidies and trade barriers abroad having on Australasian and Brazilian agriculture?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 65(2), pages 265-290, April.
    15. David Walker, 2014. "The Economic Potential for Forest-Based Carbon Sequestration under Different Emissions Targets and Accounting Schemes," Working Papers 2014.02, School of Economics, La Trobe University.
    16. Hof, John G. & Loomis, John B., 1983. "A Recreation Optimization Model Based On The Travel Cost Method," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 8(01), pages 1-10, July.
    17. Sachin Kumar Sharma & Adeet Dobhal & Surabhi Agrawal & Abhijit Das, 2021. "Demystifying Blue Box Support to Agriculture Under the WTO: Implications for Developing Countries," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 22(2), pages 161-185, September.
    18. Rolf Jens Brunstad & Ivar Gaasland & Erling Vårdal, 1995. "Agriculture as a provider of public goods: a case study for Norway," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 13(1), pages 39-49, October.
    19. Zulauf, Carl R. & Orden, David, 2014. "Assessing the Political Economy of the 2014 U.S. Farm Bill," 2014: Food, Resources and Conflict, December 7-9, 2014. San Diego, California 197160, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    20. Kerr, William A., 2016. "The WTO and Food Aid: Food Security and Surplus Disposal in the 2015 Ministerial Decision on Export Competition," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 17(01), pages 1-15.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aesc11:108780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.