IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/wfo/wstudy/61111.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Innovationseffizienz. Österreich im internationalen Vergleich

Author

Listed:
  • Jürgen Janger
  • Agnes Kügler

Abstract

Innovationsaktivitäten sind ein zentrales Element von Strategien zur Steigerung der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit und zur Bewältigung von Herausforderungen wie dem Klimawandel. Die Forschungs- und Entwicklungsausgaben sind wichtige Determinanten der Innovationsleistung. Österreichs F&E-Ausgaben wurden in den letzten 20 Jahren erfolgreich gesteigert, gemessen an der F&E-Quote nimmt es in der EU den 2., weltweit den 5. Rang ein. Gleichzeitig gelang es bisher nicht, in Innovationsrankings an die Spitze vorzustoßen. Die Studie geht deshalb der Frage nach, ob Österreichs Innovationsleistung nur unzureichend durch internationale Indikatoren erfasst wird, oder ob tatsächlich die Effizenz der Innovationsaktivitäten geringer ist. Methodisch wird neben der Vorstellung elementarer Input- und Outputindikatoren eine Dateneinhüllanalyse (DEA) eingesetzt, um Österreichs Effizienz mit anderen EU- und OECD-Ländern zu vergleichen. Wie die Ergebnisse zeigen, besteht für Österreich in drei Leistungsbereichen des Innovationssystems (Wissenschaft, Technologie und Innovationen) Aufholpotential zu den in den jeweiligen Bereichen effizientesten Ländern.

Suggested Citation

  • Jürgen Janger & Agnes Kügler, 2018. "Innovationseffizienz. Österreich im internationalen Vergleich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 61111.
  • Handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:61111
    Note: With English abstract.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/61111
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karl Aiginger & Rahel Falk, 2009. "Systemevaluierung der österreichischen Forschungsförderung und -finanzierung. Teilberichte," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 36401.
    2. Michele Cincera & Dirk Czarnitzki & Susanne Thorwarth, 2011. "Efficiency of public spending in support of R&D activities," Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 131-139.
    3. Benjamin F. Jones, 2009. "The Burden of Knowledge and the "Death of the Renaissance Man": Is Innovation Getting Harder?," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 76(1), pages 283-317.
    4. Nicholas Bloom & Charles I. Jones & John Van Reenen & Michael Webb, 2020. "Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(4), pages 1104-1144, April.
    5. Philippe Aghion & Mathias Dewatripont & Jeremy C. Stein, 2008. "Academic freedom, private‐sector focus, and the process of innovation," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 39(3), pages 617-635, September.
    6. Crepon, B. & Duguet, E. & Mairesse, J., 1998. "Research Investment, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level," Papiers d'Economie Mathématique et Applications 98.15, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    7. Zvi Griliches, 1998. "Productivity and R&D at the Firm Level," NBER Chapters, in: R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, pages 100-133, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Hölzl, Werner & Janger, Jürgen, 2014. "Distance to the frontier and the perception of innovation barriers across European countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 707-725.
    9. Jürgen Janger & Matthias Firgo & Kathrin Hofmann & Agnes Kügler & Anna Strauss & Gerhard Streicher & Hans Pechar, 2017. "Wirtschaftliche und gesellschaftliche Effekte von Universitäten," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 60794.
    10. Peneder, Michael, 2010. "Technological regimes and the variety of innovation behaviour: Creating integrated taxonomies of firms and sectors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 323-334, April.
    11. Guan, Jiancheng & Chen, Kaihua, 2012. "Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 102-115.
    12. Andreas Reinstaller, 2014. "Technologiegeber Österreich. Österreichs Wettbewerbsfähigkeit in Schlüsseltechnologien und Enwicklungspotentiale als Technologiegeber," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 47444.
    13. Howitt, Peter & Aghion, Philippe, 2006. "Appropriate Growth Policy: A Unifying Framework," Scholarly Articles 4554121, Harvard University Department of Economics.
    14. Jürgen Janger & Agnes Kügler & Andreas Reinstaller & Fabian Unterlass, 2017. "Austria 2025 – Looking Out For the Frontier(s): Towards a New Framework For Frontier Measurement in Science, Technology and Innovation," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 59289, February.
    15. Bruno Crepon & Emmanuel Duguet & Jacques Mairesse, 1998. "Research, Innovation And Productivity: An Econometric Analysis At The Firm Level," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 115-158.
    16. Maxim Kotsemir, 2013. "Measuring National Innovation Systems Efficiency - A Review of DEA Approach," Post-Print hal-00865875, HAL.
    17. Edquist , Charles & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia , Jon Mikel, 2015. "The Innovation Union Scoreboard is Flawed: The case of Sweden – not being the innovation leader of the EU," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/16, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    18. McLaughlin, John A. & Jordan, Gretchen B., 1999. "Logic models: a tool for telling your programs performance story," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 65-72.
    19. Werner Hölzl & Klaus S. Friesenbichler & Michael Böheim & Thomas Jud, 2016. "KMU-Börsen in Europa," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58896.
    20. Godin, Benoit, 2007. "Science, accounting and statistics: The input-output framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 1388-1403, November.
    21. Willi Leibfritz & Jürgen Janger, 2007. "Boosting Austria's Innovation Performance," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 580, OECD Publishing.
    22. Philippe Aghion & Peter Howitt, 2006. "Joseph Schumpeter Lecture Appropriate Growth Policy: A Unifying Framework," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 4(2-3), pages 269-314, 04-05.
    23. Seema Sharma & V. J. Thomas, 2008. "Inter-country R&D efficiency analysis: An application of data envelopment analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 76(3), pages 483-501, September.
    24. Ariel Pakes & Zvi Griliches, 1984. "Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Look," NBER Chapters, in: R&D, Patents, and Productivity, pages 55-72, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    25. Karl Aiginger & Rahel Falk & Andreas Reinstaller, 2009. "Evaluation of Government Funding in RTDI from a Systems Perspective in Austria. Synthesis Report," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 36402.
    26. Munshi Naser Ibne Afzal, 2014. "An empirical investigation of the National Innovation System (NIS) using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and the TOBIT model," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 507-523, July.
    27. Andreas Reinstaller & Fabian Unterlass, 2012. "Comparing business R&D across countries over time: a decomposition exercise using data for the EU 27," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(12), pages 1143-1148, August.
    28. Dan Andrews & Chiara Criscuolo & Peter N. Gal, 2016. "The Best versus the Rest: The Global Productivity Slowdown, Divergence across Firms and the Role of Public Policy," OECD Productivity Working Papers 5, OECD Publishing.
    29. Jürgen Janger & Anna Strauss & David Campbell, 2013. "Academic Careers: A Cross-country Perspective. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 37," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 46923.
    30. Philippe Aghion & Reinhilde Veugelers & David Hemous, 2009. "No Green Growth Without Innovation," Policy Briefs 353, Bruegel.
    31. Edquist , Charles & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia , Jon Mikel, 2015. "The Innovation Union Scoreboard is flawed: The Case of Sweden – not the innovation leader of the EU – updated version," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/27, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    32. Janger, Jürgen & Nowotny, Klaus, 2016. "Job choice in academia," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1672-1683.
    33. Werner Hölzl & Michael Böheim & Klaus S. Friesenbichler & Thomas Jud, 2017. "Börsen als Instrument der kapitalmarktbasierten Finanzierung von Klein- und Mittelbetrieben in Österreich. Internationale Beispiele und Ansatzpunkte," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 90(8), pages 629-638, August.
    34. Jiancheng Guan & Kairui Zuo, 2014. "A cross-country comparison of innovation efficiency," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 100(2), pages 541-575, August.
    35. Andreas Reinstaller & Werner Hölzl & Johannes Kutsam & Christian Schmid, 2013. "The Development of Productive Structures of EU Member Countries and Their International Competitiveness," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 46823.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jürgen Janger & Tim Slickers, 2023. "Wissensproduktion und Wissensverwertung in Österreich im internationalen Vergleich," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 96(10), pages 699-714, October.
    2. Zuzana Stuchlíková & Jarolím Antal & Radek Čajka, 2019. "Inovační potenciál a specifika Rakouska a Izraele: Implikace pro Česko," Současná Evropa, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(2), pages 19-39.
    3. Zuzana Stuchlíková & Jarolím Antal & Radek Čajka, 2019. "Inovační potenciál a specifika Rakouska a Izraele: Implikace pro Česko," Současná Evropa, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(2), pages 19-39.
    4. Jürgen Janger & Anna Strauss-Kollin, 2020. "Die Leistungsfähigkeit des österreichischen Innovationssystems," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 66555.
    5. Zuzana Stuchlíková & Jarolím Antal & Radek Čajka, 2019. "Inovační potenciál a specifika Rakouska a Izraele: Implikace pro Česko," Současná Evropa, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(2), pages 19-39.
    6. N. N., 2020. "WIFO-Monatsberichte, Heft 10/2020," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 93(10), October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janger, Jürgen & Schubert, Torben & Andries, Petra & Rammer, Christian & Hoskens, Machteld, 2017. "The EU 2020 innovation indicator: A step forward in measuring innovation outputs and outcomes?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 30-42.
    2. Jürgen Janger & Tim Slickers, 2023. "Wissensproduktion und Wissensverwertung in Österreich im internationalen Vergleich," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 96(10), pages 699-714, October.
    3. Julia Bock-Schappelwein & Jürgen Janger & Andreas Reinstaller, 2012. "Bildung 2025 – Die Rolle von Bildung in der österreichischen Wirtschaft," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 45200.
    4. Jürgen Janger & Anna Strauss-Kollin, 2020. "Die Leistungsfähigkeit des österreichischen Innovationssystems," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 66555.
    5. N. N., 2020. "WIFO-Monatsberichte, Heft 10/2020," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 93(10), October.
    6. Wifo, 2021. "WIFO-Monatsberichte, Heft 10/2021," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 94(10), October.
    7. Agnes Kügler & Jürgen Janger, 2015. "Innovationseffizienz in den EU-Ländern. Eine Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58202.
    8. Jürgen Janger, 2015. "Business Science Links For a New Growth Path. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 107," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58413.
    9. Jürgen Janger & Agnes Kügler & Andreas Reinstaller & Fabian Unterlass, 2017. "Austria 2025 – Looking Out For the Frontier(s): Towards a New Framework For Frontier Measurement in Science, Technology and Innovation," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 59289, February.
    10. Michael Peneder & Nicole Schmidt & Anna Strauss & Stefan Weingärtner, 2018. "Österreichs Wettbewerbsfähigkeit im internationalen Vergleich," WIFO Working Papers 565, WIFO.
    11. Jianhua Zhang & Mohammad Shahidul Islam, 2020. "The Heterogeneous Impacts of R&D on Innovation in Services Sector: A Firm-Level Study of Developing ASEAN," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, February.
    12. Karl Aiginger & Marcus Scheiblecker, 2016. "Österreich 2025 – Eine Agenda für mehr Dynamik, sozialen Ausgleich und ökologische Nachhaltigkeit. Fortschrittsbericht," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58885, February.
    13. Nagaoka, Sadao & Motohashi, Kazuyuki & Goto, Akira, 2010. "Patent Statistics as an Innovation Indicator," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1083-1127, Elsevier.
    14. de Rassenfosse, Gaétan & Schoen, Anja & Wastyn, Annelies, 2014. "Selection bias in innovation studies: A simple test," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 287-299.
    15. Bronwyn Hall & Alessandro Maffioli, 2008. "Evaluating the impact of technology development funds in emerging economies: evidence from Latin America," The European Journal of Development Research, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 172-198.
    16. Antonelli, Cristiano, 2017. "Digital knowledge generation and the appropriability trade-off," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 991-1002.
    17. Christopher F. Baum & Hans Lööf & Pardis Nabavi & Andreas Stephan, 2017. "A new approach to estimation of the R&D–innovation–productivity relationship," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1-2), pages 121-133, February.
    18. Montresor, Sandro & Vezzani, Antonio, 2015. "The production function of top R&D investors: Accounting for size and sector heterogeneity with quantile estimations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 381-393.
    19. Fabian Unterlass, 2013. "The relationship between innovation, exports and economic performance. Empirical evidence for 21 EU countries," EcoMod2013 5655, EcoMod.
    20. Bronwyn Hall & Francesca Lotti & Jacques Mairesse, 2009. "Innovation and productivity in SMEs: empirical evidence for Italy," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 13-33, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:61111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.