IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/bdr/bdrlib/2016a-12.html

Desempleo femenino en Colombia

Editor

Listed:
  • Arango-Thomas, Luis Eduardo
  • Castellani, Francesca
  • Lora-Torres, Eduardo

Abstract

Para llevar a cabo este estudio la Gerencia Técnica del Banco de la República y la Oficina del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo en Bogotá promovieron un concurso entre centros de investigación colombianos e investigadores del Banco de la República, sobre “Desempleo estructural femenino y heterogeneidad regional del mercado laboral colombiano”. Las ocho propuestas seleccionadas forman el cuerpo de este libro, aparte del capítulo introductorio elaborado por Eduardo Lora. Los capítulos son: “Diferencias por sexo en los flujos de trabajadores entre estados laborales y el futuro laboral de las colombianas”, por Hugo López Castaño y Francisco Lasso Valderrama, del Banco de la República; “Diferencias en las tasas de desempleo por género”, a cargo de Jaime Tenjo Galarza, Oriana Álvarez Vos y María Camila Jiménez, de la Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano; “Heterogeneidad regional en las diferencias por género de las tasas de desempleo”, desarrollado por Juan C. Duque Universidad Eafit), Gustavo García (Universidad de los Andes), Paula Herrera Idárraga (Pontificia Universidad Javeriana) y Enrique López-Bazo (AQR-IREA, Universidad de Barcelona); “Duración del desempleo en Colombia: género, intensidad de búsqueda y anuncios de vacantes”, por Luis Eduardo Arango del Banco de la República y Ana María Ríos de la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, “Calidad de los vecindarios y oferta laboral femenina en un contexto urbano: un caso aplicado a la ciudad de Medellín”, a cargo de Leonardo Fabio Morales y Lina Cardona Sosa, del Banco de la República; “Efectos laborales de los servicios de cuidado infantil: evidencia del Programa Buen Comienzo”, por Lina Cardona Sosa y Leonardo Fabio Morales; “Acceso a fuentes de empleo de las mujeres en Bogotá”, por Ana María Díaz Escobar, de la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, y “Maternidad y mercado laboral: el impacto de la legislación”, por Natalia Ramírez de la Universidad de Los Andes y Ana María Tribín y Carmiña O. Vargas, del Banco de la República. Los capítulos se derivan de los trabajos de investigación publicados en las series de Documentos de Trabajo del BID y Borradores de Economía del Banco de la República. Los procesos de investigación y edición del libro, coordinados por Francesca Castellani y Luis Eduardo Arango, contaron con la asesoría de Eduardo Lora. Las investigaciones se beneficiaron de las sugerencias de Jorge Hugo Barrientos, Raquel Bernal, Gustavo Canavire, Wendy Cunningham, Dolores de la Mata, Marcela Eslava, Luz Adriana Flórez, Edwin Goñi, Carlos Medina, Hugo Ñopo, Nataly Obando, Mauricio Ospina, Ximena Peña y Andrés Ramírez, así como de los dictámenes de evaluadores anónimos. Su esfuerzo, colaboración y aporte es gratamente valorado.

Suggested Citation

  • Arango-Thomas, Luis Eduardo & Castellani, Francesca & Lora-Torres, Eduardo (ed.), 2016. "Desempleo femenino en Colombia," Books, Banco de la Republica de Colombia, number 2016a-12, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdr:bdrlib:2016a-12
    DOI: 10.32468/Ebook.664-342-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.32468/Ebook.664-342-9
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32468/Ebook.664-342-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francine D. Blau & Lawrence M. Kahn, 2013. "Female Labor Supply: Why is the US Falling Behind?," NBER Working Papers 18702, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Hashimoto, Masanori & Percy, Rick & Schoellner, Teresa & Weinberg, Bruce A., 2004. "The Long and Short of It: Maternity Leave Coverage and Women’s Labor Market Outcomes," IZA Discussion Papers 1207, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Gruber, Jonathan, 1994. "The Incidence of Mandated Maternity Benefits," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(3), pages 622-641, June.
    4. Diego Amador & Raquel Bernal & Ximena PeÔøΩa, 2013. "El aumento en la participaci√≥n laboral femenina en Colombia: ¬øfecundidad, estado civil o educaci√≥n?," Documentos CEDE 11454, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    5. Alejandro Badel & Ximena Peña, 2010. "Decomposing the Gender Wage Gap with Sample Selection Adjustment: Evidence from Colombia," Revista de Analisis Economico – Economic Analysis Review, Universidad Alberto Hurtado/School of Economics and Business, vol. 25(2), pages 169-191, Diciembre.
    6. Maya Rossin‐Slater & Christopher J. Ruhm & Jane Waldfogel, 2013. "The Effects of California's Paid Family Leave Program on Mothers’ Leave‐Taking and Subsequent Labor Market Outcomes," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 224-245, March.
    7. Ximena Pena-Parga & Amanda Glassman, 2004. "Demand For Child Care And Female Employment In Colombia," Documentos CEDE 2267, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    8. Becker, Gary S., 1971. "The Economics of Discrimination," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 2, number 9780226041162, August.
    9. Francine D. Blau & Lawrence M. Kahn, 2013. "Female Labor Supply: Why Is the United States Falling Behind?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(3), pages 251-256, May.
    10. Ekberg, John & Eriksson, Rickard & Friebel, Guido, 2013. "Parental leave — A policy evaluation of the Swedish “Daddy-Month” reform," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 131-143.
    11. Christopher J. Ruhm, 1998. "The Economic Consequences of Parental Leave Mandates: Lessons from Europe," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 113(1), pages 285-317.
    12. Natalia Ramírez Bustamante & Ana Maria Tribin Uribe & Carmiña O. Vargas, 2015. "Maternity and Labor Markets: Impact of Legislation in Colombia," Borradores de Economia 870, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luis Eduardo Arango & Gabriela Bonilla, 2015. "Human capital agglomeration and social returns to education in Colombia," Borradores de Economia 12788, Banco de la Republica.
    2. Juan Camilo Chaparro Cardona & Tatiana Isabel Caly Amador, 2024. "Análisis de los logros educativos y la situación laboral de las personas jóvenes de Barranquilla entre 2007 y 2022," Documentos de Trabajo de Valor Público 1, Universidad EAFIT.
    3. Luis E. Arango & Luz A. Flórez, 2020. "Determinants of structural unemployment in Colombia: a search approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 2431-2464, May.
    4. Julián Andrés Arévalo (Editor) & Andrea García (Editor), 2022. "Movilización ciudadana en Colombia : elementos para el análisis," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Economía, number 86.
    5. Luis E. Arango & Francesca Castellani & Nataly Obando, 2016. "It is mainly about where you work! Labor demand in the Colombian manufacturing sector," Borradores de Economia 933, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    6. Eduardo Lora, 2020. "Empleo femenino en las ciudades colombianas: un método de descripción estadística," Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, Universidad de los Andes,Facultad de Economía, CEDE, vol. 84(4), pages 131-179.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalia Ramírez Bustamante & Ana Maria Tribin Uribe & Carmiña O. Vargas, 2015. "Maternity and Labor Markets: Impact of Legislation in Colombia," BORRADORES DE ECONOMIA 012610, BANCO DE LA REPÚBLICA.
    2. Uribe, Ana Maria Tribin & Vargas, Carmiña O. & Bustamante, Natalia Ramírez, 2019. "Unintended consequences of maternity leave legislation: The case of Colombia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 218-232.
    3. Liu, Hong & Li, Jiaying & Song, Hong & Zou, Xianqiang, 2024. "Unintended consequences of maternity leave entitlements on female labor market outcomes in China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Héctor Alberto Botello-Penaloza & Isaac Guerrero-Rinc�n, 2019. "Las leyes de licencia de maternidad y el mercado laboral en Colombia," Revista Economía y Región, Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar, vol. 13(1), pages 67-86.
    5. Fernández-Kranz, Daniel & Rodríguez-Planas, Núria, 2021. "Too family friendly? The consequences of parent part-time working rights," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    6. E. Mark Curtis & Barry T. Hirsch & Mary C. Schroeder, 2016. "Evaluating Workplace Mandates with Flows Versus Stocks: An Application to California Paid Family Leave," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 83(2), pages 501-526, October.
    7. Francine D. Blau & Lawrence M. Kahn, 2017. "The Gender Wage Gap: Extent, Trends, and Explanations," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 55(3), pages 789-865, September.
    8. Lim, Hyuksoon, 2025. "Labor market frictions for female workers and corporate innovation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    9. Sarah H. Bana & Kelly Bedard & Maya Rossin‐Slater, 2020. "The Impacts of Paid Family Leave Benefits: Regression Kink Evidence from California Administrative Data," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 888-929, September.
    10. Anne Ardila Brenøe & Serena Canaan & Nikolaj A. Harmon & Heather N. Royer, 2024. "Is Parental Leave Costly for Firms and Coworkers?," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 42(4), pages 1135-1174.
    11. Benjamin Bennett & Isil Erel & Léa H. Stern & Zexi Wang, 2020. "Paid Leave Pays Off: The Effects of Paid Family Leave on Firm Performance," NBER Working Papers 27788, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Daron Acemoglu & Joshua D. Angrist, 2001. "Consequences of Employment Protection? The Case of the Americans with Disabilities Act," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 109(5), pages 915-957, October.
    13. C. Spiess & Katharina Wrohlich, 2008. "The Parental Leave Benefit Reform in Germany: Costs and Labour Market Outcomes of Moving towards the Nordic Model," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 27(5), pages 575-591, October.
    14. Pichler, S,; & Ziebarth, N.R,;, 2015. "The Pros and Cons of Sick Pay Schemes: A Method to Test for Contagious Presenteeism and Shirking Behavior," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 15/03, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    15. Marianne Bertrand, 2018. "Coase Lecture – The Glass Ceiling," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 85(338), pages 205-231, April.
    16. Rita Ginja & Arizo Karimi & Pengpeng Xiao, 2023. "Employer Responses to Family Leave Programs," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 107-135, January.
    17. Stefan Pichler & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2015. "The Pros and Cons of Sick Pay Schemes: Testing for Contagious Presenteeism and Shirking Behavior," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1509, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    18. Pichler, Stefan & Ziebarth, Nicolas R., 2019. "Reprint of: The pros and cons of sick pay schemes: Testing for contagious presenteeism and noncontagious absenteeism behavior," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 86-104.
    19. Maclean, J. Catherine & Pichler, Stefan & Ziebarth, Nicolas R., 2020. "Mandated Sick Pay: Coverage, Utilization, and Welfare Effects," IZA Discussion Papers 13132, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Gozde Corekcioglu & Marco Francesconi & Astrid Kunze, 2025. "Parental Leave from the Firm’s Perspective," CESifo Working Paper Series 11868, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdr:bdrlib:2016a-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Clorith Angélica Bahos Olivera (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/brcgvco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.