IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v34y2026i1p624-636.html

Carbon Disclosure and Carbon Performance in Green Transition: An Empirical Study of Policy Regulation and Regional Differences

Author

Listed:
  • Tian Xia
  • Isaac Appiah‐Otoo
  • Xudong Chen

Abstract

Under the severe background of global warming, carbon emission management has become a key factor in the sustainable development of enterprises. With China's “dual carbon” goal, the challenges and opportunities of corporate carbon management have become increasingly prominent. This paper examines the impact of carbon disclosure on corporate carbon emission reduction performance, as well as the effectiveness of government subsidy mechanisms, using a sample of 33,175 firm‐year observations from Chinese A‐share listed companies between 2008 and 2023. Utilizing the fixed effects model, we find that carbon disclosure significantly enhances carbon performance; however, government subsidies mitigate the positive effect. In addition, the double difference analysis reveals that green financial policies have a negative effect on the relationship between carbon disclosure and carbon performance, suggesting that some low‐quality disclosure enterprises may obtain excessive financing through policy arbitrage, thereby weakening the emission reduction motivation of high‐quality disclosure enterprises. The analysis of regional differences reveals that enterprises in the eastern region exhibit more significant positive effects in the relationship between carbon disclosure and carbon performance, whereas those in the western region face constraints related to resource and policy support. Based on these findings, this study suggests that policymakers should strengthen the regulation of carbon disclosure quality in green finance policies while also formulating more precise regional policy support to promote enterprises' low‐carbon transition. Enterprises, on the other hand, should enhance their competitiveness in the low‐carbon economy by improving the quality of carbon disclosure and optimizing resource allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • Tian Xia & Isaac Appiah‐Otoo & Xudong Chen, 2026. "Carbon Disclosure and Carbon Performance in Green Transition: An Empirical Study of Policy Regulation and Regional Differences," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 624-636, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:1:p:624-636
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70291
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70291?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cheng Che & Yi Chen & Xiaoguang Zhang & Zhihong Zhang & Wei Zhang, 2021. "The Impact of Different Government Subsidy Methods on Low-Carbon Emission Reduction Strategies in Dual-Channel Supply Chain," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-9, January.
    2. Freeman, Richard B, 1984. "Longitudinal Analyses of the Effects of Trade Unions," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(1), pages 1-26, January.
    3. Shahid Ali & Aamir Azeem & Zhou Xiaohong & Muhammad Akram Naseem & Syed Waqar Haider, 2024. "Validity of Governance-Prosperity: Fresh Evidence Under Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Methods," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, November.
    4. Yu He & Qingliang Tang & Kaitian Wang, 2013. "Carbon disclosure, carbon performance, and cost of capital," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(3-4), pages 190-220, December.
    5. Shi Wang, 2025. "Green Credit, Digital Economy and Enterprise Pollution Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Chu, Baoju & Dong, Yizhe & Liu, Yaorong & Ma, Diandian & Wang, Tianju, 2024. "Does China's emission trading scheme affect corporate financial performance: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    7. Ma, Anmiao, 2025. "Relationship between carbon disclosure quality, green innovation and organizational performance under the background of carbon neutrality," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    8. Isaac Appiah-Otoo & Na Song, 2021. "The Impact of Fintech on Poverty Reduction: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, May.
    9. Qingxia (Jenny) Wang, 2023. "Financial effects of carbon risk and carbon disclosure: A review," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4175-4219, December.
    10. Ling, Maoliang & Liu, Chutian & Xu, Lin & Yang, Haimi, 2024. "Carrot and stick incentive policies for climate change mitigation: A survey experiment on crowding out of public support," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    11. Wang, Fangjun & Sun, Junqin & Liu, Yang Stephanie, 2019. "Institutional pressure, ultimate ownership, and corporate carbon reduction engagement: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 14-26.
    12. Zhen, Zhiyong & Lu, Bingquan, 2024. "The impact of green finance on corporate carbon disclosure: Financial regulation as a moderator," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tang, Pengcheng & Wang, Guolin & Wang, Jinwei & Tian, Hao, 2025. "Decoding carbon information disclosure with NLP techniques: Combating carbonwashing for energy and climate transition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    2. Walsh, Frank, 2013. "The union wage effect and ability bias: Evidence from Ireland," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 296-298.
    3. Laisney, François & Pohlmeier, Winfried & Staat, Matthias, 1991. "Estimation of labour supply functions using panel data: a survey," ZEW Discussion Papers 91-05, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    4. Adele Bergin, 2015. "Employer Changes and Wage Changes: Estimation with Measurement Error in a Binary Variable," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 29(2), pages 194-223, June.
    5. Bárbara Galleli & Elder Semprebon & Joyce Aparecida Ramos dos Santos & Noah Emanuel Brito Teles & Mateus Santos de Freitas-Martins & Raquel Teodoro da Silva Onevetch, 2021. "Institutional Pressures, Sustainable Development Goals and COVID-19: How Are Organisations Engaging?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Chen, Chunhua & Jiang, Dequan & Lan, Meng & Li, Weiping & Ye, Ling, 2022. "Does environmental regulation affect labor investment Efficiency?Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 82-95.
    7. Richard B. Freeman, 2007. "Labor Market Institutions Around the World," NBER Working Papers 13242, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Broadstock, David C. & Fouquet, Roger & Kim, Jeong Won, 2025. "Carbon pricing and stock performance: are carbon prices already more influential than energy prices?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 128928, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Robert Gibbons & Lawrence Katz, 1992. "Does Unmeasured Ability Explain Inter-Industry Wage Differentials?," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 59(3), pages 515-535.
    10. Rees, Daniel I. & Sabia, Joseph J. & Argys, Laura M., 2009. "A head above the rest: Height and adolescent psychological well-being," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 217-228, July.
    11. Qiu, Zhaoxuan & Li, Jincheng & Liu, Bei & Jin, Meilin & Wang, Jinmin, 2025. "How does energy quota trading affect the corporate pollution gap? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    12. Giovanni DOSI & Maria Enrica VIRGILLITO, 2019. "Whither the evolution of the contemporary social fabric? New technologies and old socio‐economic trends," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 158(4), pages 593-625, December.
    13. Mona Ali Mohamed Khalil & Mohamed Abdelraouf & Tamer Shahwan, 2026. "Evaluating the effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on corporate financial performance” an applied study on Egyptian stock market," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Fidan Ana Kurtulus & Douglas Kruse, 2018. "An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Employee Ownership and Employment Stability in the US: 1999–2011," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 56(2), pages 245-291, June.
    15. John Addison & Paulino Teixeira & Katalin Evers & Lutz Bellmann, 2014. "Indicative and Updated Estimates of the Collective Bargaining Premium in Germany," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 125-156, January.
    16. Hausman, J. A. & Abrevaya, Jason & Scott-Morton, F. M., 1998. "Misclassification of the dependent variable in a discrete-response setting," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 239-269, September.
    17. Cecilia Rouse & Claudia Goldin, 2000. "Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of "Blind" Auditions on Female Musicians," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(4), pages 715-741, September.
    18. Agnieszka Karman & Mariusz Bieniek & Armand Kasztelan, 2025. "The Impact of Climate Aspirations on Corporate Carbon Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 9908-9929, December.
    19. Hamermesh, Daniel S., 1999. "LEEping into the future of labor economics: the research potential of linking employer and employee data," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 25-41, March.
    20. Baez, Maria Josefina & Brassiolo, Pablo & Estrada, Ricardo & Fajardo, Gustavo, 2022. "Going subnational: Wage differentials across levels of government in Brazil, Mexico, and Uruguay," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:1:p:624-636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.