IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/soecon/v92y2025i1p152-175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of Certificate‐of‐Need laws on physician earnings and labor supply

Author

Listed:
  • Moiz Bhai

Abstract

Despite considerable research on Certificate‐of‐Need (CON) laws in healthcare provision, there is limited evidence on healthcare providers' labor market responses to these laws. Using data from the American Community Survey between 2005 and 2019, I show that physicians in CON states earn approximately 2.5%–3% less than physicians in non‐CON states and are less likely to be self‐employed. This occurs despite no differences in hours worked or alternative measures of labor supply. Next, I use variation from the Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion as a demand shock to examine how physician earnings and labor supply respond in CON and non‐CON states. While I observe no differences in earnings and hours worked, I find higher rates of self‐employment and lower rates of part‐time work in CON states compared to non‐CON states. The difference in earnings without corresponding differences in hours worked suggests that CON laws add frictions to the labor market. More importantly, the Affordable Care Act analysis revealing differences in self‐employment and part‐time work indicates that these rigidities prevent adequate provider response to changing market conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Moiz Bhai, 2025. "The effect of Certificate‐of‐Need laws on physician earnings and labor supply," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 92(1), pages 152-175, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:92:y:2025:i:1:p:152-175
    DOI: 10.1002/soej.12776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12776
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/soej.12776?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:92:y:2025:i:1:p:152-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2325-8012 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.