IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/soecon/v91y2024i1p38-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How does occupational licensing affect entry into the medical field? An examination of emergency medical technicians

Author

Listed:
  • Aaron Yelowitz
  • Samuel J. Ingram

Abstract

The COVID‐19 pandemic has led to temporary suspensions of many occupational licensing laws in an effort to manage surges in health care demand. The crisis highlights more general concerns about occupational licensing laws, yet convincing empirical evidence on the degree to which such laws have inhibited entry into health care professions is scarce. In this study, we indirectly examine how occupational licensing affects the choice to become an emergency medical technician (EMT) by exploiting the demand‐side shock from the Affordable Care Act (ACA). We find suggestive evidence that while the demand‐side shock from the ACA increased the likelihood of being an EMT, this effect was substantially moderated by more stringent occupational licensing laws. The implied effects for young individuals in the most careful specification suggests virtually complete offset; the ACA demand‐side shock would increase entry by 18 percentage points, while occupational licensing restrictions reduce entry by a similar magnitude.

Suggested Citation

  • Aaron Yelowitz & Samuel J. Ingram, 2024. "How does occupational licensing affect entry into the medical field? An examination of emergency medical technicians," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 91(1), pages 38-61, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:91:y:2024:i:1:p:38-61
    DOI: 10.1002/soej.12525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12525
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/soej.12525?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:91:y:2024:i:1:p:38-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2325-8012 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.