IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/quante/v16y2025i2p749-793.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power of personalized smoking cessation: A quantitative lifecycle framework for policy evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Li‐Shiun Chen
  • Ping Wang
  • Yao Yao

Abstract

Evidence suggests that smokers' responsiveness to cessation medication depends on genotypes. Whether personalized treatment based on genotypes is cost effective compared to standard treatments, however, has been unexplored. We thus construct a lifecycle model with endogenous health evolution and life expectancy and with heterogeneities in genotypes, demographics, and adolescent smoking. We examine the cost effectiveness of three intervention policies: (i) a standard policy where all smokers receive counseling and medication, (ii) a standard policy where some smokers receive counseling and others receive counseling and medication, and (iii) a personalized policy based on genotypes. The personalized policy proves the most cost effective: every dollar of program cost generates about $29 and $40 in value measured over the lifecycle for smokers treated at age 37 and 52, respectively, about 16–22% higher than the two standard policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Li‐Shiun Chen & Ping Wang & Yao Yao, 2025. "Power of personalized smoking cessation: A quantitative lifecycle framework for policy evaluation," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 16(2), pages 749-793, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:quante:v:16:y:2025:i:2:p:749-793
    DOI: 10.3982/QE1412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3982/QE1412
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3982/QE1412?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:quante:v:16:y:2025:i:2:p:749-793. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.