IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v47y2026i1p85-108.html

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Committees and Corporate Sustainable Development Performance: A Dual Legitimacy Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ting Li
  • Yuanqin Li
  • Han Yang

Abstract

Motivated by the global sustainability imperative, this paper reveals that ESG committees boost corporate sustainable performance in Chinese A + H firms by balancing conforming legitimacy (norm adherence) and strategic legitimacy (stakeholder engagement). Ownership structure moderates outcomes, and effectiveness rises in firms prioritizing core stakeholders or having gender‐diverse boards but diminishes with strong internal controls. The findings advance legitimacy theory by integrating institutional and strategic perspectives. Practical guidance urges firms to establish ESG committees, tailor strategies to ownership contexts, and leverage board diversity. Policymakers should refine guidelines for emerging markets balancing state and market forces.

Suggested Citation

  • Ting Li & Yuanqin Li & Han Yang, 2026. "Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Committees and Corporate Sustainable Development Performance: A Dual Legitimacy Perspective," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 47(1), pages 85-108, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:47:y:2026:i:1:p:85-108
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.70026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.70026
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.70026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ranjita Islam & Erica French & Muhammad Ali, 2022. "Evaluating board diversity and its importance in the environmental and social performance of organizations," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1134-1145, September.
    2. Bardos, Katsiaryna Salavei & Ertugrul, Mine & Gao, Lucia Silva, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility, product market perception, and firm value," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    3. Jialing Wu & Daojuan Wang & Xiaoxia Fu & Weina Meng, 2023. "Antecedent Configurations of ESG Disclosure: Evidence from the Banking Sector in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Amama Shaukat & Yan Qiu & Grzegorz Trojanowski, 2016. "Board Attributes, Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy, and Corporate Environmental and Social Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 569-585, May.
    5. Christine Adel & Mostaq M. Hussain & Ehab K.A. Mohamed & Mohamed A.K. Basuony, 2019. "Is corporate governance relevant to the quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure in large European companies?," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(2), pages 301-332, May.
    6. David Card & Alan B. Krueger, 1996. "School Resources and Student Outcomes: An Overview of the Literature and New Evidence from North and South Carolina," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 10(4), pages 31-50, Fall.
    7. Zhang, Zhongqingyang & Zhu, Huiming & Zhou, Zhongbao & Zou, Kai, 2022. "How does innovation matter for sustainable performance? Evidence from small and medium-sized enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 251-265.
    8. Bradbury, Michael & Jia, Jing & Li, Zhongtian, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility committees and the use of corporate social responsibility assurance services," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2).
    9. Jeffrey S. Harrison & Douglas A. Bosse & Robert A. Phillips, 2010. "Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 58-74, January.
    10. Robert G. Eccles & Ioannis Ioannou & George Serafeim, 2012. "The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance," NBER Working Papers 17950, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. C. José García Martín & Begoña Herrero, 2020. "Do board characteristics affect environmental performance? A study of EU firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 74-94, January.
    12. Zelong Wei & Hao Shen & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Julie Juan Li, 2017. "How Does Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Matter in a Dysfunctional Institutional Environment? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 209-223, January.
    13. Karl V. Lins & Henri Servaes & Ane Tamayo, 2017. "Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 72(4), pages 1785-1824, August.
    14. Zeena Mardawi & Aladdin Dwekat & Rasmi Meqbel & Pedro Carmona Ibáñez, 2023. "Configurational analysis of corporate governance and corporate social responsibility reporting assurance: understanding the role of board and CSR committee," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(2), pages 512-542, May.
    15. Crifo, Patricia & Diaye, Marc-Arthur & Pekovic, Sanja, 2016. "CSR related management practices and firm performance: An empirical analysis of the quantity–quality trade-off on French data," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P3), pages 405-416.
    16. Corinne Post & Noushi Rahman & Cathleen McQuillen, 2015. "From Board Composition to Corporate Environmental Performance Through Sustainability-Themed Alliances," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 423-435, August.
    17. Wang, Kai & Li, Tingting & San, Ziyao & Gao, Hao, 2023. "How does corporate ESG performance affect stock liquidity? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    18. Tornikoski, Erno T. & Newbert, Scott L., 2007. "Exploring the determinants of organizational emergence: A legitimacy perspective," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 311-335, March.
    19. Lina Ma & Xue Zhang & Longzhu Dong, 2023. "Enhancing Sustainable Performance: The Innovative Strategy of Digital Transformation Leading Green Collaborative Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-28, August.
    20. repec:fth:prinin:366 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Nguyen, Phuc Minh & Jubb, Christine & Dias, Roshanthi, 2024. "Motives for environmental and social engagement and stock liquidity: The moderating role of sustainability committees," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    22. Connie X. Mao & Jamie Weathers, 2019. "Employee treatment and firm innovation," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(7-8), pages 977-1002, July.
    23. Gao, Wei & Liu, Zebin, 2023. "Green credit and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PB).
    24. Francesco De Luca & Jenice Prather-Kinsey, 2018. "Legitimacy theory may explain the failure of global adoption of IFRS: the case of Europe and the U.S," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(3), pages 501-534, September.
    25. David Card & Alan Krueger, 1996. "School Resources and Student Outcomes: An Overview of the Literature and New Evidence from North and South Carolina," Working Papers 745, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section..
    26. Waymond Rodgers & Hiu Choy & Andrés Guiral, 2013. "Do Investors Value a Firm’s Commitment to Social Activities?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(4), pages 607-623, June.
    27. Hoje Jo & Hakkon Kim & Kwangwoo Park, 2015. "Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Firm Performance in the Financial Services Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 257-284, October.
    28. Iftekhar Hasan & Nada Kobeissi & Liuling Liu & Haizhi Wang, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance: The Mediating Role of Productivity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 671-688, May.
    29. Ahmad Hammami & Mohammad Hendijani Zadeh, 2020. "Audit quality, media coverage, environmental, social, and governance disclosure and firm investment efficiency," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(1), pages 45-72, January.
    30. Nazim Hussain & Ugo Rigoni & René P. Orij, 2018. "Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 411-432, May.
    31. Yao Dong & Chen Liang & Zhong Wanyin, 2023. "Board diversity and firm performance: impact of ESG activities in China," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 1592-1609, March.
    32. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Karaman, Abdullah S. & Kilic, Merve & Uyar, Ali, 2020. "Board attributes, CSR engagement, and corporate performance: What is the nexus in the energy sector?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    33. Habiba Al‐Shaer & Mahbub Zaman, 2018. "Credibility of sustainability reports: The contribution of audit committees," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 973-986, November.
    34. Lu, Jing & Wang, Jun, 2021. "Corporate governance, law, culture, environmental performance and CSR disclosure: A global perspective," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    35. Chengli Shu & Kevin Z. Zhou & Yazhen Xiao & Shanxing Gao, 2016. "How Green Management Influences Product Innovation in China: The Role of Institutional Benefits," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(3), pages 471-485, February.
    36. Victor Daniel-Vasconcelos & Maisa de Souza Ribeiro & Vicente Lima Crisóstomo, 2022. "Does gender diversity moderate the relationship between CSR committees and Sustainable Development Goals disclosure? Evidence from Latin American companies," RAUSP Management Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 57(4), pages 434-456, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Karaman, Abdullah S. & Kilic, Merve & Uyar, Ali, 2020. "Board attributes, CSR engagement, and corporate performance: What is the nexus in the energy sector?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Ramírez-Orellana, Alicia & Martínez-Victoria, MCarmen & García-Amate, Antonio & Rojo-Ramírez, Alfonso A., 2023. "Is the corporate financial strategy in the oil and gas sector affected by ESG dimensions?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Nguyen, Phuc Minh & Jubb, Christine & Dias, Roshanthi, 2024. "Motives for environmental and social engagement and stock liquidity: The moderating role of sustainability committees," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Dewan Muktadir‐Al‐Mukit & Firoz Haroon Bhaiyat, 2024. "Impact of corporate governance diversity on carbon emission under environmental policy via the mandatory nonfinancial reporting regulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1397-1417, February.
    5. Mounia Boulhaga & Abdelfettah Bouri & Ahmed A. Elamer & Bassam A. Ibrahim, 2023. "Environmental, social and governance ratings and firm performance: The moderating role of internal control quality," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 134-145, January.
    6. Zhang, Dayong & Zhang, Zhiwei & Ji, Qiang & Lucey, Brian & Liu, Jia, 2021. "Board characteristics, external governance and the use of renewable energy: International evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    7. Jingzhuo Yu & Yong-Sik Hwang, 2024. "The Interaction Effects of Board Independence and Digital Transformation on Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance: Complementary or Substitutive?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-26, October.
    8. Sonia Boukattaya & Zyed Achour & Zeineb Hlioui, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance: An Empirical Literature Review," Post-Print hal-03472433, HAL.
    9. Mariasole Bannò & Emilia Filippi & Sandro Trento, 2023. "Women in top echelon positions and their effects on sustainability: a review, synthesis and future research agenda," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(1), pages 181-251, March.
    10. Paolo Agnese & Francesca Romana Arduino & Massimiliano Cerciello & Simone Taddeo, 2024. "Does board knowledge matter for ESG performance in the European banking industry?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4454-4468, September.
    11. Rosalinda Santonastaso & Riccardo Macchioni & Claudia Zagaria, 2026. "Audit Committee Characteristics and Sustainability Performance: The Mediating Role of Sustainability Reporting Quality," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 1213-1229, April.
    12. Jing Lu & Dongning Yu & Fereshteh Mahmoudian & Jamal A. Nazari & Irene M. Herremans, 2024. "The influence of board interlocks and sustainability experience on transparent sustainability disclosure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 3769-3793, July.
    13. Nurlan Orazalin & Mady Baydauletov, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1664-1676, July.
    14. Ali Uyar & Cemil Kuzey & Merve Kilic & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2021. "Board structure, financial performance, corporate social responsibility performance, CSR committee, and CEO duality: Disentangling the connection in healthcare," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1730-1748, November.
    15. Rasmi Meqbel & Mohammad Alta'any & Salah Kayed & Ahmed Al‐Omush, 2024. "Earnings management and sustainability assurance: The moderating role of CSR committee," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1769-1785, May.
    16. Nurlan Orazalin, 2020. "Do board sustainability committees contribute to corporate environmental and social performance? The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 140-153, January.
    17. Aladdin Dwekat & Muiz Abu Alia & Islam Abdeljawad & Rasmi Meqbel, 2025. "Governing for the green: How European board attributes are driving environmental innovation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 2128-2146, March.
    18. Zhenjie Liu & Weian Li & Chen Hao & Huan Liu, 2021. "Corporate environmental performance and financing constraints: An empirical study in the Chinese context," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 616-629, March.
    19. Jonathan Taglialatela & Ivan Miroshnychenko & Roberto Barontini & Francesco Testa, 2024. "Talk or walk? The board of directors and firm environmental strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2890-2910, May.
    20. Bagh, Tanveer & Zhou, Bingjun & Alawi, Suha Mahmoud & Azam, Rauf I, 2024. "ESG resilience: Exploring the non-linear effects of ESG performance on firms sustainable growth," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:47:y:2026:i:1:p:85-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.