Author
Listed:
- Rosalinda Santonastaso
- Riccardo Macchioni
- Claudia Zagaria
Abstract
This study examines the impact of audit committee characteristics, specifically independence and expertise, on sustainability performance. It also explores the mediating role of sustainability reporting quality in the relationship between audit committee characteristics and sustainability performance. The study analyzes a sample of 8336 firm‐year observations across 18 European countries and 10 economic sectors from 2012 to 2022. The results reveal that audit committee independence and expertise are positively associated with sustainability performance. Furthermore, the quality of sustainability reporting mediates this relationship, explaining how audit committee characteristics enhance sustainability performance. Empirical evidence regarding the relationship between audit committees and sustainability performance within European countries is limited. Prior research mainly focuses on the direct effects of audit committees on sustainability performance. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study that provides useful evidence regarding the mediating impact of sustainability reporting quality on the relationship between audit committee characteristics and sustainability performance, offering novel insights into this underexplored area. The findings offer important implications for managers focused on identifying the drivers and enablers for improving sustainability performance. They also contribute to the ongoing regulatory debate by highlighting that a deeper understanding of audit committees' composition and expertise would make European companies more sustainable and more focused on enhancing the quality of sustainability reporting.
Suggested Citation
Rosalinda Santonastaso & Riccardo Macchioni & Claudia Zagaria, 2026.
"Audit Committee Characteristics and Sustainability Performance: The Mediating Role of Sustainability Reporting Quality,"
Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 1213-1229, April.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:1213-1229
DOI: 10.1111/beer.12842
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:1213-1229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.