IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/fistud/v46y2025i4p423-450.html

Not just a North–South divide: the geography of opportunity in England

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro Carneiro
  • Francesca Foliano
  • Sonya Krutikova
  • Julia Loh
  • Lindsey Macmillan

Abstract

The United Kingdom is one of the most spatially unequal countries in the OECD. This paper investigates how the link between opportunity and childhood background varies across England. We use administrative data linking education records and labour market outcomes to study how the socio‐economic conditions in the residential neighbourhood where one grows up are associated with earnings in adulthood. We find that the strength of this relationship varies sharply across England and that there are large differences in earnings of those who grew up in equally poor neighbourhoods in different parts of the country. While the North–South divide is evident, we also find significant variation within regions. A group that stands out is young women and men who grew up in poor neighbourhoods of regional cities (large cities outside of London) whose earnings are significantly lower than those of counterparts outside the cities. Two themes run through our analysis: substantial gender differences in key trends, and the fact that greater equality of opportunity within a place does not always translate into better outcomes for the disadvantaged. Key policy implications include the need to consider highly localised inequalities, gender differences, and whether greater equality is achieved through better opportunities for the disadvantaged.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro Carneiro & Francesca Foliano & Sonya Krutikova & Julia Loh & Lindsey Macmillan, 2025. "Not just a North–South divide: the geography of opportunity in England," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(4), pages 423-450, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:fistud:v:46:y:2025:i:4:p:423-450
    DOI: 10.1111/1475-5890.70012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.70012
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1475-5890.70012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:fistud:v:46:y:2025:i:4:p:423-450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1475-5890 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.