IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i3p3944-3964.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investor Responses to ESG News Sentiment: Exploring Differential Effects and Industry Moderation

Author

Listed:
  • Se‐Hee Jeong
  • Jeong‐Ji Han
  • Soyoung Jun
  • Shawn Kim
  • Jong Woo Kim

Abstract

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles have gained prominence in the capital markets. While ESG ratings are widely used to assess corporate sustainability, their disagreement and time lag limit their effectiveness for investors. This study proposes ESG news sentiment as an alternative measure of corporate ESG activities and investigates the investor responses to it. Using sustainability reports, we developed lexicons to classify news into ESG and non‐ESG categories and further categorized ESG news into environmental, social, and governance dimensions. Through hierarchical regression analysis, we examine the impact of media‐derived ESG factors on market value and stock returns. Our findings reveal that ESG news sentiment is more positively associated with firm performance compared to non‐ESG news. This is particularly evident for social and governance dimensions, with effects varying across industries depending on their ESG concerns. These results demonstrate the value of ESG news sentiment analysis in understanding market responses to corporate sustainability practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Se‐Hee Jeong & Jeong‐Ji Han & Soyoung Jun & Shawn Kim & Jong Woo Kim, 2025. "Investor Responses to ESG News Sentiment: Exploring Differential Effects and Industry Moderation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 3944-3964, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:3944-3964
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.3163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3163
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.3163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:3944-3964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.