IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v34y2025i4p1201-1224.html

Exploring stakeholder engagement network behavior: Strategic and managerial implications for corporate social responsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Linzalone
  • Salvatore Ammirato
  • Alberto Michele Felicetti
  • Vincenzo Corvello
  • Francesco Santarsiero

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between Stakeholder Engagement (SE) and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), approaching CSR as a complex system made up of components and interactions. Adopting a System Thinking approach to analyze CSR in a stakeholders‐company network, explorative research is conducted through three stages: (1) a critical literature review aimed to identify the components of the CSR system model, (2) the development of the dataset and of the Causal Loop Diagram (CLD) model, (3) the analysis of the CSR behavior in light of the ‘system archetypes’ underpinning the system. The analysis reveals both the structure and the dynamics of CSR and explain its behavior in light of the stakeholder engagement network variables. Findings from this research underscore the existence of six feedback loops, which characterize the relation CSR‐SE. The ‘company‐stakeholder fit’ acts as a growth engine for the stakeholder engagement network, however other balancing dynamics (e.g., detriment of business objectives) require a tradeoff between Social and Business orientation. This paper contributes to a more profound understanding of the relation between CSR and stakeholder engagement, showing in particular the link between CSR and SE under the assumption of stakeholder‐company network. The insights provided serve as a guide for managers and policymakers to navigate the complex dynamics of SE to inform effective strategies of CSR based on network structural actions.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Linzalone & Salvatore Ammirato & Alberto Michele Felicetti & Vincenzo Corvello & Francesco Santarsiero, 2025. "Exploring stakeholder engagement network behavior: Strategic and managerial implications for corporate social responsibility," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 1201-1224, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:34:y:2025:i:4:p:1201-1224
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.12692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12692
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.12692?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clyde Eiríkur Hull & Sandra Rothenberg, 2008. "Firm performance: the interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(7), pages 781-789, July.
    2. Barbara Wisse & Rob Eijbergen & Eric F. Rietzschel & Susanne Scheibe, 2018. "Catering to the Needs of an Aging Workforce: The Role of Employee Age in the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Satisfaction," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(4), pages 875-888, February.
    3. Ofer Zwikael & Arun A. Elias & Mark J. Ahn, 2012. "Stakeholder collaboration and engagement in virtual projects," International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 117-136.
    4. Michelle Greenwood, 2007. "Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 315-327, September.
    5. Skouloudis, Antonis & Evangelinos, Konstantinos & Moraitis, Stavros, 2012. "Accountability and stakeholder engagement in the airport industry: An assessment of airports’ CSR reports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 16-20.
    6. Snyder, Hannah, 2019. "Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 333-339.
    7. Agostino Vollero & Maria Palazzo & Alfonso Siano & Wim J.L. Elving, 2016. "Avoiding the greenwashing trap: between CSR communication and stakeholder engagement," International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 120-140.
    8. Mehdi Taghian & Clare D’Souza & Michael Polonsky, 2015. "A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility, reputation and business performance," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(2), pages 340-363, June.
    9. Jonathan Bundy & Ryan M. Vogel & Miles A. Zachary, 2018. "Organization–stakeholder fit: A dynamic theory of cooperation, compromise, and conflict between an organization and its stakeholders," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 476-501, February.
    10. Carroll, Archie B., 1991. "The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 39-48.
    11. Petro Poutanen & Wael Soliman & Pirjo Ståhle, 2016. "The complexity of innovation: an assessment and review of the complexity perspective," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(2), pages 189-213, May.
    12. Ioanna Boulouta & Christos Pitelis, 2014. "Who Needs CSR? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on National Competitiveness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 119(3), pages 349-364, February.
    13. Mohammed Benlemlih & Mohammad Bitar, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Investment Efficiency," Post-Print halshs-01321227, HAL.
    14. Thomas Maak, 2007. "Responsible Leadership, Stakeholder Engagement, and the Emergence of Social Capital," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 329-343, September.
    15. Morgan Miles & Linda Munilla & Jenny Darroch, 2006. "The Role of Strategic Conversations with Stakeholders in the Formation of Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 195-205, December.
    16. Khojastehpour, Morteza & Shams, S.M. Riad, 2020. "Addressing the complexity of stakeholder management in international ecological setting: A CSR approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 302-309.
    17. John D. Sterman, 1989. "Modeling Managerial Behavior: Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 321-339, March.
    18. David C Lane, 2000. "Diagramming conventions in system dynamics," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(2), pages 241-245, February.
    19. Mehdi Taghian & Clare D’Souza & Michael Polonsky, 2015. "A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility, reputation and business performance," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(2), pages 340-363, June.
    20. Michael Robinson & Anne Kleffner & Stephanie Bertels, 2011. "Signaling Sustainability Leadership: Empirical Evidence of the Value of DJSI Membership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(3), pages 493-505, July.
    21. Duane Windsor, 2010. "The Role of Dynamics in Stakeholder Thinking," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 79-87, August.
    22. Mohammed Benlemlih & Isabelle Girerd-Potin, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility and firm financial risk reduction: On the moderating role of the legal environment," Post-Print hal-01977064, HAL.
    23. Rémi BAZILLIER & Julien Vauday, 2009. "The Greenwashing Machine, Is CSR more than communication ?," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 1617, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    24. Mohammed Benlemlih & Isabelle Girerd-Potin, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility and firm financial risk reduction: On the moderating role of the legal environment," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(7-8), pages 1137-1166, July.
    25. Bendell, Bari L. & Nesij Huvaj, M., 2020. "Does stakeholder engagement through corporate social and environmental behaviors affect innovation?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 685-696.
    26. Ven van de, B. & Graafland, J.J., 2006. "Strategic and moral motivation for corporate social responsibility," MPRA Paper 20278, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    27. M C Jackson, 2009. "Fifty years of systems thinking for management," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 24-32, May.
    28. Angela R. Dobele & Kate Westberg & Marion Steel & Kris Flowers, 2014. "An Examination of Corporate Social Responsibility Implementation and Stakeholder Engagement: A Case Study in the Australian Mining Industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 145-159, March.
    29. Skilton, Paul F. & Purdy, Jill M., 2017. "Authenticity, Power, and Pluralism: A Framework for Understanding Stakeholder Evaluations of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 99-123, January.
    30. Roberto Linzalone & Salvatore Ammirato & Alberto Michele Felicetti, 2023. "An exploration of the causal structure underlying crowdfunding: theoretical findings and practical implications," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(7), pages 127-159, March.
    31. Sean Valentine & Gary Fleischman, 2008. "Ethics Programs, Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility and Job Satisfaction," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 77(2), pages 159-172, January.
    32. Giovanni-Battista Derchi & Laura Zoni & Andrea Dossi, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility Performance, Incentives, and Learning Effects," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 617-641, October.
    33. Mariusz Karwowski & Monika Raulinajtys‐Grzybek, 2021. "The application of corporate social responsibility (CSR) actions for mitigation of environmental, social, corporate governance (ESG) and reputational risk in integrated reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1270-1284, July.
    34. Stefan Schaltegger & Marcus Wagner, 2011. "Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: categories and interactions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 222-237, May.
    35. Donal Crilly & Pamela Sloan, 2012. "Enterprise logic: explaining corporate attention to stakeholders from the ‘inside‐out’," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(10), pages 1174-1193, October.
    36. Fabio Caputo & Simone Pizzi & Lorenzo Ligorio & Rossella Leopizzi, 2021. "Enhancing environmental information transparency through corporate social responsibility reporting regulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3470-3484, December.
    37. Wilkin, Carla L. & Campbell, John & Moore, Stephen & Simpson, Jason, 2018. "Creating value in online communities through governance and stakeholder engagement," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 56-68.
    38. Viglia, Giampaolo & Pera, Rebecca & Bigné, Enrique, 2018. "The determinants of stakeholder engagement in digital platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 404-410.
    39. J. Robert Mitchell & Ronald K. Mitchell & Richard A. Hunt & David M. Townsend & Jae H. Lee, 2022. "Stakeholder Engagement, Knowledge Problems and Ethical Challenges," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 75-94, January.
    40. Khoa Truong An Nguyen & Ngoc Khuong Mai & Le Nha Ca Nguyen, 2021. "The impact of corporate social responsibility practices on competitive advantage: Vietnamese evidence," International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(2), pages 177-195.
    41. Thomas Moellers & Lars von der Burg & Bastian Bansemir & Max Pretzl & Oliver Gassmann, 2019. "System dynamics for corporate business model innovation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(3), pages 387-406, September.
    42. Mohammed Benlemlih & Mohammad Bitar, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Investment Efficiency," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(3), pages 647-671, March.
    43. Caterina Tantalo & Richard L. Priem, 2016. "Value creation through stakeholder synergy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 314-329, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adewole Olukorede, 2025. "Stakeholder engagement and participation in environmental contexts, social responsibility and society based on a study conducted in Rome, Italy," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-45, December.
    2. Yousef Eiadat, 2023. "The CSR‐19 scale: A measure of corporate social responsibility actions during COVID‐19 pandemic," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(S3), pages 257-269, October.
    3. Alberto Michele Felicetti & Roberto Linzalone & Serena Filippelli & Barbara Bigliardi, 2025. "Connecting the dots in green food purchasing behavior literature: A system thinking approach for systematic literature reviews," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 1831-1859, October.
    4. Nazari, Jamal A. & Poursoleyman, Ehsan, 2025. "Beyond the tipping point: The nonlinear impact of material sustainability on investment efficiency," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Paraskevi (Evi) Dekoulou & Anna Anastasopoulou & Panagiotis Trivellas, 2023. "Employee Performance Implications of CSR for Organizational Resilience in the Banking Industry: The Mediation Role of Psychological Empowerment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Ehsan Poursoleyman & Gholamreza Mansourfar & Mohammad Kabir Hassan & Saeid Homayoun, 2024. "Did Corporate Social Responsibility Vaccinate Corporations Against COVID-19?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(3), pages 525-551, January.
    7. Zhe Li & Ping Wang & Tianlong Wu, 2021. "Do foreign institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? Evidence from listed firms in China," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1-2), pages 338-373, January.
    8. Akanksha Shukla & Geetika & Nimesh Shukla, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility Measures: A Brief Review," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 10(1), pages 101-120, January.
    9. Annesi, Nora & Battaglia, Massimo & Sganzetta, Lorenza, 2023. "Mutual benefits of sustainability integration in the value chain: Responsible innovation by public utilities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    10. Elias Erragragui & Jonathan Peillex & Mohammed Benlemlih & Mohammad Bitar, 2023. "Stock market reactions to corporate misconduct: The moderating role of legal origin," Post-Print hal-04124991, HAL.
    11. Kabir, Rezaul & Thai, Hanh Minh, 2021. "Key factors determining corporate social responsibility practices of Vietnamese firms and the joint effects of foreign ownership," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    12. Mohammed Benlemlih & Li Cai, 2020. "Corporate environmental performance and financing decisions," Post-Print hal-03124950, HAL.
    13. Erragragui, Elias & Peillex, Jonathan & Benlemlih, Mohammed & Bitar, Mohammad, 2023. "Stock market reactions to corporate misconduct: The moderating role of legal origin," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    14. Mohammed Benlemlih & Jamil Jaballah & Sholom Schochet & Jonathan Peillex, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate tax avoidance: The channel effect of consumer awareness," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1-2), pages 31-60, January.
    15. Naomi Haefner & Maximilian Palmié & Petteri T. Leppänen, 2023. "With(Out) a Little Help From My Friends? Reconciling Incongruous Findings on Stakeholder Management, Innovation, and Firm Performance," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(1), pages 142-171, January.
    16. Ranjan Chaudhuri & Sheshadri Chatterjee & Demetris Vrontis & Gianpaolo Basile, 2025. "Examining the role of knowledge sharing among stakeholders and firm innovation performance: Moderating role of technology usage," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 43-57, January.
    17. Marco Valerio Rossi & Pasquale Sasso & Andrea Perna & Ludovico Solima, 2025. "Engaging marginal stakeholders on social networking sites. A cross‐country exploratory analysis among Generation Z consumers," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 155-173, January.
    18. Lei Zhou & Feng Wei & Yu Kong, 2022. "Do Employee Stock Ownership Plans Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-19, January.
    19. Mercedes Rubio-Andrés & Santiago Gutiérrez-Broncano & Jorge Linuesa-Langreo & Miguel Ángel Sastre-Castillo, 2025. "Exploring the reality of corporate sustainability strategy and sales performance in entrepreneurial SMEs: the mediating effect of innovation and sustainability performance," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-34, December.
    20. Mingzhe Qiao & Shiwei Xu & Guangdong Wu, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility and the Long-Term Performance of Mergers and Acquisitions: Do Regions and Related-Party Transactions Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:34:y:2025:i:4:p:1201-1224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.