IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v34y2025i1p43-57.html

Examining the role of knowledge sharing among stakeholders and firm innovation performance: Moderating role of technology usage

Author

Listed:
  • Ranjan Chaudhuri
  • Sheshadri Chatterjee
  • Demetris Vrontis
  • Gianpaolo Basile

Abstract

Knowledge sharing is a typical activity of using different ways to share ideas, skills, expertise, and opinions among friends, family members, peers, communities, and employees. Knowledge can be shared with a firm's internal and external stakeholders, and it can improve process efficiency as well as product quality. Not many studies have examined the influence of knowledge sharing among different stakeholders of a firm and its impact on a firm's innovative performance. Also, studies that understand the role of modern technology usage in firm innovation performance are scant. Using stakeholder theory, other views, and existing literature, we have developed a theoretical model that was validated using the PLS‐SEM technique to analyze 341 respondents from different firms in India. The study demonstrates that knowledge sharing has a significant impact among stakeholders on improving firm innovation performance. The study also finds that stakeholder usage of modern technology has a significant moderating impact on the relationship between process innovation, product innovation, and innovation performance of firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Ranjan Chaudhuri & Sheshadri Chatterjee & Demetris Vrontis & Gianpaolo Basile, 2025. "Examining the role of knowledge sharing among stakeholders and firm innovation performance: Moderating role of technology usage," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 43-57, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:43-57
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.12575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12575
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.12575?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruce Kogut & Udo Zander, 1992. "Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 383-397, August.
    2. Michelle Greenwood, 2007. "Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 315-327, September.
    3. Sheshadri Chatterjee & Ranjan Chaudhuri, 2022. "Supply chain sustainability during turbulent environment: Examining the role of firm capabilities and government regulation," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1081-1095, December.
    4. Nicolai J. Foss & Keld Laursen & Torben Pedersen, 2011. "Linking Customer Interaction and Innovation: The Mediating Role of New Organizational Practices," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 980-999, August.
    5. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Vrontis, Demetris & Thrassou, Alkis, 2022. "SME entrepreneurship and digitalization – the potentialities and moderating role of demographic factors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    6. Mishra, Anubhav & Maheswarappa, Satish S. & Maity, Moutusy & Samu, Sridhar, 2018. "Adolescent's eWOM intentions: An investigation into the roles of peers, the Internet and gender," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 394-405.
    7. Renu L. Rajani & Githa S. Heggde & Rupesh Kumar & Deepak Bangwal, 2022. "Demand management approaches in services sector and influence on company performance," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 72(10), pages 2808-2837, July.
    8. Nicholas Ind & Oriol Iglesias & Stefan Markovic, 2017. "The co-creation continuum: from tactical market research tool to strategic collaborative innovation method," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(4), pages 310-321, August.
    9. Gyrd-Jones, Richard I. & Kornum, Niels, 2013. "Managing the co-created brand: Value and cultural complementarity in online and offline multi‐stakeholder ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1484-1493.
    10. Kevin Zheng Zhou & Julie Juan Li & Nan Zhou & Chenting Su, 2008. "Market orientation, job satisfaction, product quality, and firm performance: evidence from China," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(9), pages 985-1000, September.
    11. Jeffrey S. Harrison & Douglas A. Bosse & Robert A. Phillips, 2010. "Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 58-74, January.
    12. Markovic, Stefan & Bagherzadeh, Mehdi, 2018. "How does breadth of external stakeholder co-creation influence innovation performance? Analyzing the mediating roles of knowledge sharing and product innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 173-186.
    13. Sheshadri Chatterjee & Kalyan Kumar Bhattacharjee & Chia-Wen Tsai & Amit Kumar Agrawal, 2021. "Impact of peer influence and government support for successful adoption of technology for vocational education: A quantitative study using PLS-SEM technique," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 2041-2064, December.
    14. Kolk, Ans & Pinkse, Jonatan, 2006. "Stakeholder Mismanagement and Corporate Social Responsibility Crises," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 59-72, February.
    15. Madan Annavarjula & Ramesh Mohan, 2009. "Impact of Technological Innovation Capabilities on the Market Value of Firms," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(03), pages 241-250.
    16. Phillips, Robert & Freeman, R. Edward & Wicks, Andrew C., 2003. "What Stakeholder Theory is Not," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 479-502, October.
    17. Anna S. Cui & Fang Wu, 2016. "Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation: antecedents and impact of customer involvement on new product performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 516-538, July.
    18. Viglia, Giampaolo & Pera, Rebecca & Bigné, Enrique, 2018. "The determinants of stakeholder engagement in digital platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 404-410.
    19. Jordi Surroca & Josep A. Tribó & Sandra Waddock, 2010. "Corporate responsibility and financial performance: the role of intangible resources," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 463-490, May.
    20. Linda O’Riordan & Jenny Fairbrass, 2014. "Managing CSR Stakeholder Engagement: A New Conceptual Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 121-145, November.
    21. Caterina Tantalo & Richard L. Priem, 2016. "Value creation through stakeholder synergy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 314-329, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Markovic, Stefan & Bagherzadeh, Mehdi, 2018. "How does breadth of external stakeholder co-creation influence innovation performance? Analyzing the mediating roles of knowledge sharing and product innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 173-186.
    2. Sara Moggi & Fabietti Giacomo & Isonni Elisa, 2025. "Enhancing value creation through stakeholder engagement in sustainable mega‐events: The case of Expo 2020 Dubai legacy," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 1928-1941, October.
    3. Pantano, Eleonora & Priporas, Constantinos-Vasilios & Viassone, Milena & Migliano, Giuseppe, 2020. "Does the stakeholder engagement result in new drinks? Evidence from family owned SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 185-194.
    4. Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Gupta, Shivam & Kamble, Sachin, 2023. "Green supply chain technology and organization performance: Moderating role of environmental dynamism and product-service innovation capability," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    5. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Mariani, Marcello & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2023. "Examining the role of intellectual capital on knowledge sharing in digital platform-based MNEs and its impact on firm performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    6. Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Mariani, Marcello M. & Wamba, Samuel Fosso, 2024. "Assessing the influence of emerging technologies on organizational data driven culture and innovation capabilities: A sustainability performance perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    7. Xiaoping Zhao & Audrey Murrell, 2022. "Does A Virtuous Circle Really Exist? Revisiting the Causal Linkage Between CSP and CFP," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(1), pages 173-192, April.
    8. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Vrontis, Demetris & Dana, Léo-Paul & Kabbara, Diala, 2024. "Developing resilience of MNEs: From global value chain (GVC) capability and performance perspectives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    9. Secundo, Giustina & Del Vecchio, Pasquale & Simeone, Luca & Schiuma, Giovanni, 2020. "Creativity and stakeholders' engagement in open innovation: Design for knowledge translation in technology-intensive enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 272-282.
    10. Viglia, Giampaolo & Pera, Rebecca & Bigné, Enrique, 2018. "The determinants of stakeholder engagement in digital platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 404-410.
    11. Lite J. Nartey & Witold J. Henisz & Sinziana Dorobantu, 2023. "Reciprocity in Firm–Stakeholder Dialog: Timeliness, Valence, Richness, and Topicality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 429-451, March.
    12. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Mariani, Marcello & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2023. "Prosumers’ intention to co-create business value and the moderating role of digital media usage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    13. Isaksson, Lars E. & Woodside, Arch G., 2016. "Modeling firm heterogeneity in corporate social performance and financial performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3285-3314.
    14. Liliana Hawrysz & Jolanta Maj, 2017. "Identification of Stakeholders of Public Interest Organisations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    15. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Gupta, Shivam & Sivarajah, Uthayasankar & Bag, Surajit, 2023. "Assessing the impact of big data analytics on decision-making processes, forecasting, and performance of a firm," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    16. De Luca, Francesco & Iaia, Lea & Mehmood, Asad & Vrontis, Demetris, 2022. "Corrigendum to “Can social media improve stakeholder engagement and communication of Sustainable Development Goals? A cross-country analysis”," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    17. Johanna Kujala & Anna Heikkinen & Ari Jokinen & Riikka Tapaninaho, 2022. "Stakeholder Engagement in the Generation of Urban Ecosystem Services: The Case of the Vuores Stormwater System," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 11(1), pages 49-63, April.
    18. Roberto Linzalone & Salvatore Ammirato & Alberto Michele Felicetti & Vincenzo Corvello & Francesco Santarsiero, 2025. "Exploring stakeholder engagement network behavior: Strategic and managerial implications for corporate social responsibility," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 1201-1224, October.
    19. Helna Almeida de Araujo Góes & Ghulam Fatima & Ronaldo de Oliveira Santos Jhunior & João Maurício Gama Boaventura, 2023. "Managing for stakeholders towards corporate environmental sustainability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1561-1572, July.
    20. Michela Matarazzo & Stephen Oduro & Alessandro Gennaro, 2025. "Stakeholder engagement for sustainable value co‐creation: Evidence from made in Italy SMEs," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 347-361, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:43-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.