IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v34y2025i1p155-173.html

Engaging marginal stakeholders on social networking sites. A cross‐country exploratory analysis among Generation Z consumers

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Valerio Rossi
  • Pasquale Sasso
  • Andrea Perna
  • Ludovico Solima

Abstract

This research explores the marginal stakeholder engagement and propensity to value cocreation in the fast‐fashion industry by taking Generation Z consumers (GZCs) as observation unit and social networking sites (SNSs) as context of investigation. By undertaking 24 in‐depth interviews with US and Italian GZCs, the study uncovers the main elements that influence their engagement generation on SNSs and highlights that at least four main paradoxes (PXs) exist in this scenario. Specifically, the interviewees reported that they do not trust those brands that make them feel as marginal consumers (PX1) and that they are likely to be extremely loyal to those brands that actively take them into consideration in their activities on SNSs (PX2). In addition, although GZCs concerned about the environment, in most cases, they will buy repeatedly from fast‐fashion brands for convenience reasons (PX3). Finally, social dimension of GZCs engagement appears to be influenced by their peers' preferences (PX4). This research is the first that explored GZCs by considering them under the lenses of stakeholder engagement and offering novel insights about common believes on this generation of consumers. Therefore, theoretical and managerial implications are discussed to advance current knowledge on GZCs and to help the development of new strategies to engage them on SNSs.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Valerio Rossi & Pasquale Sasso & Andrea Perna & Ludovico Solima, 2025. "Engaging marginal stakeholders on social networking sites. A cross‐country exploratory analysis among Generation Z consumers," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 155-173, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:155-173
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.12616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12616
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.12616?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sanjay Kumar Singh & Manlio Del Giudice & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Hengky Latan & Amrik Singh Sohal, 2022. "Stakeholder pressure, green innovation, and performance in small and medium‐sized enterprises: The role of green dynamic capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 500-514, January.
    2. Artem Timoshenko & John R. Hauser, 2019. "Identifying Customer Needs from User-Generated Content," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Jennifer Rowley, 2012. "Conducting research interviews," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(3/4), pages 260-271, March.
    4. Lim, Weng Marc & Rasul, Tareq, 2022. "Customer engagement and social media: Revisiting the past to inform the future," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 325-342.
    5. Noble, Stephanie M. & Haytko, Diana L. & Phillips, Joanna, 2009. "What drives college-age Generation Y consumers?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 617-628, June.
    6. Michelle Greenwood, 2007. "Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 315-327, September.
    7. María Del Rocío Bonilla & José Luis del Olmo Arriaga & David Andreu, 2019. "The interaction of Instagram followers in the fast fashion sector: The case of Hennes and Mauritz (H&M)," Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 342-357, October.
    8. F. Ziesemer & A. Hüttel & I. Balderjahn, 2021. "Young People as Drivers or Inhibitors of the Sustainability Movement: The Case of Anti-Consumption," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 427-453, September.
    9. Qian Yuan & Shuqin Cai & Peng Zhou, 2014. "A resource mapping framework for value co-creation in social media," International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(1/2), pages 25-39.
    10. Fournier, Susan, 1998. "Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(4), pages 343-373, March.
    11. Vernuccio, Maria & Ceccotti, Federica, 2015. "Strategic and organisational challenges in the integrated marketing communication paradigm shift: A holistic vision," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 438-449.
    12. Magdalena Rzemieniak & Monika Wawer, 2021. "Employer Branding in the Context of the Company’s Sustainable Development Strategy from the Perspective of Gender Diversity of Generation Z," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    13. Jennifer Rowley, 2012. "Conducting research interviews," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(3/4), pages 260-271, March.
    14. Valentinov, Vladislav & Chia, Robert, 2022. "Stakeholder theory: A process‐ontological perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 31(3), pages 762-776.
    15. Tafesse, Wondwesen & Wood, Bronwyn P., 2021. "Followers' engagement with instagram influencers: The role of influencers’ content and engagement strategy," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    16. Djafarova, Elmira & Bowes, Tamar, 2021. "‘Instagram made Me buy it’: Generation Z impulse purchases in fashion industry," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    17. Ben Letaifa, Soumaya & Edvardsson, Bo & Tronvoll, Bård, 2016. "The role of social platforms in transforming service ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1933-1938.
    18. Hollebeek, Linda D. & Glynn, Mark S. & Brodie, Roderick J., 2014. "Consumer Brand Engagement in Social Media: Conceptualization, Scale Development and Validation," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 149-165.
    19. Cedric Dawkins, 2014. "The Principle of Good Faith: Toward Substantive Stakeholder Engagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(2), pages 283-295, May.
    20. J. Scott Armstrong, 1979. "Advocacy and Objectivity in Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 423-428, May.
    21. Shubham & Parikshit Charan & L.S. Murty, 2018. "Secondary stakeholder pressures and organizational adoption of sustainable operations practices: The mediating role of primary stakeholders," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 910-923, November.
    22. Loureiro, Sandra Maria Correia & Romero, Jaime & Bilro, Ricardo Godinho, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement in co-creation processes for innovation: A systematic literature review and case study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 388-409.
    23. Maria Vernuccio & Margherita Pagani & Camilla Barbarossa & Alberto Pastore, 2015. "Antecedents of brand love in online network-based communities : A social identity perspective," Post-Print hal-02313277, HAL.
    24. Piller, Frank & Vossen, Alexander & Ihl, Christoph, 2012. "From Social Media to Social Product Development: The Impact of Social Media on Co-Creation of Innovation," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 66(1), pages 7-27.
    25. Vladislav Valentinov & Robert Chia, 2022. "Stakeholder theory: A process‐ontological perspective," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 762-776, July.
    26. Birte Freudenreich & Florian Lüdeke-Freund & Stefan Schaltegger, 2020. "A Stakeholder Theory Perspective on Business Models: Value Creation for Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 3-18, September.
    27. Goworek, Helen & Oxborrow, L. & Claxton, S. & McLaren, A. & Cooper, T. & Hill, H., 2020. "Managing sustainability in the fashion business: Challenges in product development for clothing longevity in the UK," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 629-641.
    28. Leonidou, Erasmia & Christofi, Michael & Vrontis, Demetris & Thrassou, Alkis, 2020. "An integrative framework of stakeholder engagement for innovation management and entrepreneurship development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 245-258.
    29. Troise, Ciro & Tani, Mario & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Investigating the impact of multidimensional social capital on equity crowdfunding performance," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    30. Ching-Hui (Joan) Su & Chin-Hsun (Ken) Tsai & Ming-Hsiang Chen & Wan Qing Lv, 2019. "U.S. Sustainable Food Market Generation Z Consumer Segments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-14, June.
    31. Robert Strand & R. Freeman, 2015. "Scandinavian Cooperative Advantage: The Theory and Practice of Stakeholder Engagement in Scandinavia," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 65-85, March.
    32. Myoung-Jin Chae, 2021. "Driving Consumer Engagement through Diverse Calls to Action in Corporate Social Responsibility Messages on Social Media," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, March.
    33. Jennifer Rowley, 2012. "Conducting research interviews," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(3/4), pages 260-271, March.
    34. Seahee Lee, 2011. "Consumers’ Value, Environmental Consciousness, and Willingness to Pay more toward Green-Apparel Products," Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 161-169.
    35. Viglia, Giampaolo & Pera, Rebecca & Bigné, Enrique, 2018. "The determinants of stakeholder engagement in digital platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 404-410.
    36. Shah, Muhammad Umair & Guild, Paul D., 2022. "Stakeholder engagement strategy of technology firms: A review and applied view of stakeholder theory," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    37. J. Robert Mitchell & Ronald K. Mitchell & Richard A. Hunt & David M. Townsend & Jae H. Lee, 2022. "Stakeholder Engagement, Knowledge Problems and Ethical Challenges," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 75-94, January.
    38. Alison Munsch, 2021. "Millennial and generation Z digital marketing communication and advertising effectiveness: A qualitative exploration," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 10-29, January.
    39. Riad Shams, S.M. & Vrontis, Demetris & Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Chavan, Gitesh & Czinkota, Michael R., 2020. "Stakeholder engagement for innovation management and entrepreneurial development: A meta-analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 67-86.
    40. Valentina Cillo & Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli & Lorenzo Ardito & Manlio Del Giudice, 2019. "Understanding sustainable innovation: A systematic literature review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5), pages 1012-1025, September.
    41. Shawky, Sara & Kubacki, Krzysztof & Dietrich, Timo & Weaven, Scott, 2020. "A dynamic framework for managing customer engagement on social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 567-577.
    42. Irene M. Herremans & Jamal A. Nazari & Fereshteh Mahmoudian, 2016. "Stakeholder Relationships, Engagement, and Sustainability Reporting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 417-435, October.
    43. Robert Strand & R. Freeman, 2015. "Erratum to: Scandinavian Cooperative Advantage: The Theory and Practice of Stakeholder Engagement in Scandinavia," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 87-87, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olivia Aronson & Irene Henriques, 2023. "Shared Value Creation in Equivocal CSR Environments: A Configuration Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(4), pages 713-732, November.
    2. Karolina Bähr & Alexander Fliaster, 2023. "The twofold transition: Framing digital innovations and incumbents' value propositions for sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 920-935, February.
    3. Khatri, Ishwar & Giskås, Paul Einar & Kyrrø, Anneli Kalliainen & Kjærland, Frode, 2025. "Corporate governance mechanisms and non-financial disclosure quality: Evidence from sustainability committee, external CSR assurance, and stakeholder engagement," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    4. Michela Matarazzo & Stephen Oduro & Alessandro Gennaro, 2025. "Stakeholder engagement for sustainable value co‐creation: Evidence from made in Italy SMEs," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 347-361, April.
    5. Civera, Chiara & Casalegno, Cecilia & Morelli, Brigida & Santoro, Gabriele, 2026. "Seeds of change: Unpacking the enduring effects of MNC knowledge transfer in autonomous social innovation projects by fringe stakeholders," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    6. Francesco Antonio Perotti & Augusto Bargoni & Paola De Bernardi & Zoltan Rozsa, 2025. "Fostering circular economy through open innovation: Insights from multiple case study," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 390-408, April.
    7. Tarcia Camily Cavalcante Quezado & Nuno Fortes & William Quezado Figueiredo Cavalcante, 2022. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics on Brand Fidelity: The Importance of Brand Love and Brand Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Archana Mishra & Lance Newey & Paul Spee, 2025. "Greatest Good for the Greatest Number – the Role of Managers’ Ethical Meaning-Making and Subjective Wellbeing Complexity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(3), pages 557-579, March.
    9. Letizia Lo Presti & Mario Testa & Vittoria Marino & Pierpaolo Singer, 2019. "Engagement in Healthcare Systems: Adopting Digital Tools for a Sustainable Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Viglia, Giampaolo & Pera, Rebecca & Bigné, Enrique, 2018. "The determinants of stakeholder engagement in digital platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 404-410.
    11. Sanz-Blas, Silvia & Buzova, Daniela & Pérez-Ruiz, Pilar, 2021. "Building relational worth in an online social community through virtual structural embeddedness and relational embeddedness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    12. Susana C. Esper & Luciano Barin-Cruz & Jean-Pascal Gond, 2024. "Engaging Stakeholders During Intergovernmental Conflict: How Political Attributions Shape Stakeholder Engagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 1-27, April.
    13. Sara Moggi & Fabietti Giacomo & Isonni Elisa, 2025. "Enhancing value creation through stakeholder engagement in sustainable mega‐events: The case of Expo 2020 Dubai legacy," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 1928-1941, October.
    14. Damiano Cortese & Chiara Civera & Cecilia Casalegno & Alessandro Zardini, 2024. "Transformative social innovation in developing and emerging ecosystems: a configurational examination," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 827-857, March.
    15. Máté Pusker & Blanka Berényi & Judit T. Kárász & Szabolcs Takács, 2025. "Detecting emotions during interview simulations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 1507-1551, April.
    16. Weiger, Welf H. & Giertz, Johann N. & Hammerschmidt, Maik & Hollebeek, Linda D., 2025. "Blurred lines? Disentangling the roles of consumers’ influencer- and brand engagement in shaping brand performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    17. Linda D. Hollebeek & V. Kumar & Rajendra K. Srivastava & Moira K. Clark, 2023. "Moving the stakeholder journey forward," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 23-49, January.
    18. Diego F. Uribe & Isabel Ortiz-Marcos & Ángel Uruburu, 2018. "What Is Going on with Stakeholder Theory in Project Management Literature? A Symbiotic Relationship for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    19. Sally Wightman & Garrett Potts & Ron Beadle, 2023. "‘Whose Call?’ The Conflict Between Tradition-Based and Expressivist Accounts of Calling," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(4), pages 947-962, April.
    20. Maike Althaus & Christian Vorbohle & Michelle Müller & Dennis Kundisch, 2025. "Setting the stage for a flourishing cultural data ecosystem: A spotlight on business models of cultural event platforms," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-22, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:155-173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.