IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i2p828-d481177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employer Branding in the Context of the Company’s Sustainable Development Strategy from the Perspective of Gender Diversity of Generation Z

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Rzemieniak

    (Department of Marketing, Faculty of Management, Lublin University of Technology, 20618 Lublin, Poland)

  • Monika Wawer

    (Department of Enterprise Management, Faculty of Social Sciences, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 20950 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

Applying the principles of sustainable development is an element of building the image of an organisation as an employer. The opinions of young people commencing their professional career in this regard may prove important for companies. The aim of this article is to identify a dependence between generation Z’s opinions on employer branding measures based on sustainable development taken by companies and the respondents’ gender. The article presents the results of primary research conducted on a sample of 291 students of higher education institutions in Poland. The methods include questionnaire surveys and statistical data processing. The results of the research suggest that sustainable development measures undertaken by employers increase the candidates’ motivation to apply for a job in the organisation. The analysis demonstrated that generation Z’s opinions on sustainable development activities carried out by employers and on the significance of employer branding are dependent on the respondents’ gender. The main conclusion is that women are more ecologically oriented than men, and following a sustainable development strategy is more important for them. Companies building employer branding should consider the adoption of various factors identified in the article, such as the Employee Value Proposition (EVP), especially when their workforce is gender-diverse.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Rzemieniak & Monika Wawer, 2021. "Employer Branding in the Context of the Company’s Sustainable Development Strategy from the Perspective of Gender Diversity of Generation Z," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:828-:d:481177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/828/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/828/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tony Edwards & Paul Edwards & Anthony Ferner & Paul Marginson & Olga Tregaskis, 2010. "Multinational Companies and the Diffusion of Employment Practices from Outside the Country of Origin," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 613-634, October.
    2. Nurlan Orazalin & Mady Baydauletov, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1664-1676, July.
    3. Gabriela Sabau, 2020. "The Political Economy of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Florina PINZARU & Alina MIHALCEA & Alexandra ZBUCHEA, 2017. "Recruiting And Motivating Millennials: Empirical Insights For Managers," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 729-737, November.
    5. Fred P. Gale, 2018. "The Political Economy of Sustainability," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 17147.
    6. Unknown, 2014. "Media Coverage 2014," 2014: Ethics, Efficiency and Food Security: Feeding the 9 Billion, Well, 26-28 August 2014 225573, Crawford Fund.
    7. Petra Bezeljak & Martin Scheuch & Gregor Torkar, 2020. "Understanding of Sustainability and Education for Sustainable Development among Pre-Service Biology Teachers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Al-Shaer, Habiba & Zaman, Mahbub, 2016. "Board gender diversity and sustainability reporting quality," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 210-222.
    9. Christy Glass & Alison Cook & Alicia R. Ingersoll, 2016. "Do Women Leaders Promote Sustainability? Analyzing the Effect of Corporate Governance Composition on Environmental Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(7), pages 495-511, November.
    10. Asit Bhattacharyya & Mohammed Lutfur Rahman, 2020. "Values, gender and attitudes towards environmental policy: A study of future managers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2514-2527, September.
    11. Weber, Heloise & Weber, Martin, 2020. "When means of implementation meet Ecological Modernization Theory: A critical frame for thinking about the Sustainable Development Goals initiative," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    12. Kalina Grzesiuk & Monika Wawer, 2018. "Employer Branding On The Web: An Empirical Study Of The Selected Polish Companies," CBU International Conference Proceedings, ISE Research Institute, vol. 6(0), pages 162-169, September.
    13. Chaminda Wijethilake & Tek Lama, 2019. "Sustainability core values and sustainability risk management: Moderating effects of top management commitment and stakeholder pressure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 143-154, January.
    14. Mavisakalyan, Astghik & Tarverdi, Yashar & Weber, Clas, 2018. "Talking in the present, caring for the future: Language and environment," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 1370-1387.
    15. Liad Bareket-Bojmel & Avichai Shuv-Ami, 2019. "The brand is my workplace," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(5), pages 818-833, July.
    16. Sea-Jin Chang & Arjen van Witteloostuijn & Lorraine Eden, 2010. "From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 41(2), pages 178-184, February.
    17. Muhammad Nadeem & Stephen Bahadar & Ammar Ali Gull & Umer Iqbal, 2020. "Are women eco‐friendly? Board gender diversity and environmental innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3146-3161, December.
    18. Stiglitz, Joseph E., 2019. "Addressing climate change through price and non-price interventions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 594-612.
    19. Ximena Rueda & Andrea Paz & Theodora Gibbs‐Plessl & Ronald Leon & Byron Moyano & Eric F Lambin, 2018. "Smallholders at a Crossroad: Intensify or Fall behind? Exploring Alternative Livelihood Strategies in a Globalized World," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 215-229, February.
    20. Nicola Cucari & Salvatore Esposito De Falco & Beatrice Orlando, 2018. "Diversity of Board of Directors and Environmental Social Governance: Evidence from Italian Listed Companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 250-266, May.
    21. Kumar Verma Bhupendra & Shirish Sangle, 2018. "Product Stewardship Strategy: A Study of Indian Firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(2), pages 124-134, March.
    22. Walid Ben-Amar & Millicent Chang & Philip McIlkenny, 2017. "Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Response to Sustainability Initiatives: Evidence from the Carbon Disclosure Project," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 369-383, May.
    23. Saleh F. A. Khatib & Dewi Fariha Abdullah & Ahmed A. Elamer & Raed Abueid, 2021. "Nudging toward diversity in the boardroom: A systematic literature review of board diversity of financial institutions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 985-1002, February.
    24. Poonam Chawla, 2020. "Impact of Employer Branding on Employee Engagement in BPO Sector in India With the Mediating Effect of Person-Organisation Fit," International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals (IJHCITP), IGI Global, vol. 11(3), pages 59-73, July.
    25. Rodney Duffett, 2020. "The YouTube Marketing Communication Effect on Cognitive, Affective and Behavioural Attitudes among Generation Z Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, June.
    26. Magdalena Rzemieniak & Francesco Iannuli, 2015. "The Effectiveness Of Online Advertising Of Companies In Poland," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 12(2), pages 130-138, December.
    27. Agnieszka Bem & Rafał Siedlecki & Paweł Prędkiewicz & Patrizia Gazzola & Bożena Ryszawska & Paulina Ucieklak-Jeż, 2019. "Hospitals’ Financial Health in Rural and Urban Areas in Poland: Does It Ensure Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    28. Giovanni Dosi & Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2020. "ICC announcement: annual special issue on macro economics and development," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(3), pages 577-580.
    29. Jiří Strouhal & Hana Řezanková & Carmen Bonaci & Razvan Mustata & Tsz Li & Anna-Lena Lochman & Kathrin Born & Romain Wagner, 2015. "Perceptions of Czech Professional Accountants on Current Trends in Reporting," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 21(1), pages 135-136, March.
    30. Subhash C. Kundu & Archana Mor & Sandeep Kumar & Jahanvi Bansal, 2019. "Diversity within management levels and organizational performance: employees’ perspective," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(1), pages 110-130, September.
    31. Klaus CONRAD, 2005. "Price Competition and Product Differentiation when Goods have Network Effects," Industrial Organization 0502002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    32. Åström, Stefan & Tohka, Antti & Bak, Jesper & Lindblad, Maria & Arnell, Jenny, 2013. "Potential impact on air pollution from ambitious national CO2 emission abatement strategies in the Nordic countries – environmental links between the UNFCCC and the UNECE – CLRTAP," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 114-124.
    33. Røpke, Inge, 2016. "Complementary system perspectives in ecological macroeconomics — The example of transition investments during the crisis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 237-245.
    34. Daly, Herman E., 2006. "Population, migration, and globalization," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 187-190, September.
    35. Nodir Adilov & Hugh J. Martin, 2014. "How Media Coverage Affects Employer Reputation, How Negative Cover Stories Increase Magazine Sales, and How Bandwagon Effects Drive Audience Selection of Foreign Movies," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 177-180, December.
    36. Heesup Han & Bee‐Lia Chua & Antonio Ariza‐Montes & Elena‐Nicoleta Untaru, 2020. "Effect of environmental corporate social responsibility on green attitude and norm activation process for sustainable consumption: Airline versus restaurant," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1851-1864, July.
    37. Muhammad Tariq & Muhammad Yasir & Abdul Majid, 2020. "Promoting employees' environmental performance in hospitality industry through environmental attitude and ecological behavior: Moderating role of managers' environmental commitment," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 3006-3017, November.
    38. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2019. "An Agenda for Reforming Economic Theory," Frontiers of Economics in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities, Higher Education Press, vol. 14(2), pages 149-167, June.
    39. Brian Chi-ang Lin, 2020. "Sustainable Growth: A Circular Economy Perspective," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(2), pages 465-471, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ridhya Goyal & Gurvinder Kaur, 2023. "Identifying the impact of employer branding in the retention of nurses: the mediating role of organizational culture and career development," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Patrick Klein & Bastian Popp, 2022. "Last-Mile Delivery Methods in E-Commerce: Does Perceived Sustainability Matter for Consumer Acceptance and Usage?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Magdalena Rzemieniak & Joanna Wyrwisz & Katarzyn Toborek, 2021. "The Relationship between Consumers‘ Characteristics and the Expectations towards a Brand‘s Value," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 264-277.
    4. Joanna Wyrwisz & Jacek Dziwulski, 2021. "Sustainability as a Brand Power Factor in the Women's and Men's Assessment," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 357-367.
    5. Agnieszka Laskowska & Jan Franciszek Laskowski, 2022. "“Silver” Generation at Work—Implications for Sustainable Human Capital Management in the Industry 5.0 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Ángel Acevedo-Duque & Romel Gonzalez-Diaz & Elena Cachicatari Vargas & Anherys Paz-Marcano & Sheyla Muller-Pérez & Guido Salazar-Sepúlveda & Giulia Caruso & Idiano D’Adamo, 2021. "Resilience, Leadership and Female Entrepreneurship within the Context of SMEs: Evidence from Latin America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Chaang-Iuan Ho & Tzong-Shyuan Chen & Chin-Pei Li, 2023. "Airbnb’s Negative Externalities from the Consumer’s Perspective: How the Effects Influence the Booking Intention of Potential Guests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-28, May.
    8. Patrycja Palen-Tondel & Alicja Smolbik-Jeczmien, 2021. "Looking for a Fulcrum- Are Preferred Work Values Different for Four Generation Cohorts Co-existing in the Labour Market of Poland?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 102-119.
    9. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Mirela Panait, 2022. "Understanding the Impact of Generation Z on Risk Management—A Preliminary Views on Values, Competencies, and Ethics of the Generation Z in Public Administration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-13, March.
    10. Kalina Grzesiuk & Dorota Jegorow & Monika Wawer & Anna Głowacz, 2023. "Energy-Efficient City Transportation Solutions in the Context of Energy-Conserving and Mobility Behaviours of Generation Z," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-28, August.
    11. Monika Wawer & Kalina Grzesiuk & Dorota Jegorow, 2022. "Smart Mobility in a Smart City in the Context of Generation Z Sustainability, Use of ICT, and Participation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-30, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayman Issa & Mohammad A. A. Zaid & Jalal Rajeh Hanaysha, 2022. "Exploring the relationship between female director's profile and sustainability performance: Evidence from the Middle East," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 1980-2002, September.
    2. Lorenzo Ardito & Rosa Maria Dangelico & Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli, 2021. "The link between female representation in the boards of directors and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from B corps," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 704-720, March.
    3. Sara De Masi & Agnieszka Słomka‐Gołębiowska & Claudio Becagli & Andrea Paci, 2021. "Toward sustainable corporate behavior: The effect of the critical mass of female directors on environmental, social, and governance disclosure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1865-1878, May.
    4. Kim Beasy & Fred Gale, 2020. "Disrupting the Status-Quo of Organisational Board Composition to Improve Sustainability Outcomes: Reviewing the Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Shubham Singhania & Jagvinder Singh & Deepti Aggrawal, 2023. "Gender diversity on board and corporate sustainability: a quantitative review based on bibliometric mapping," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(1), pages 267-286, February.
    6. Simona Cosma & Paola Schwizer & Lorenzo Nobile & Rossella Leopizzi, 2021. "Environmental attitude in the board. Who are the “green directors”? Evidences from Italy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3360-3375, November.
    7. Mariasole Bannò & Emilia Filippi & Sandro Trento, 2023. "Women in top echelon positions and their effects on sustainability: a review, synthesis and future research agenda," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(1), pages 181-251, March.
    8. Thi H.H. Nguyen & Mohamed H. Elmagrhi & Collins G. Ntim & Yue Wu, 2021. "Environmental performance, sustainability, governance and financial performance: Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2313-2331, July.
    9. Pier Luigi Marchini & Veronica Tibiletti & Tatiana Mazza & Gianluca Gabrielli, 2022. "Gender quotas and the environment: Environmental performance and enforcement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 256-272, January.
    10. James J. Cordeiro & Giorgia Profumo & Ilaria Tutore, 2020. "Board gender diversity and corporate environmental performance: The moderating role of family and dual‐class majority ownership structures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1127-1144, March.
    11. Pallab Kumar Biswas & Larelle Chapple & Helen Roberts & Kevin Stainback, 2023. "Board Gender Diversity and Women in Senior Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(1), pages 177-198, January.
    12. Fan, Pengda & Qian, Xuepeng & Wang, Jian, 2023. "Does gender diversity matter? Female directors and firm carbon emissions in Japan," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    13. Giuliana Birindelli & Stefano Dell’Atti & Antonia Patrizia Iannuzzi & Marco Savioli, 2018. "Composition and Activity of the Board of Directors: Impact on ESG Performance in the Banking System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Ge Wang & Huijin Zhang & Saixing Zeng & Xiaohua Meng & Han Lin, 2023. "Reporting on sustainable development: Configurational effects of top management team and corporate characteristics on environmental information disclosure," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 28-52, January.
    15. Andrea Lippi, 2021. "The Relationship Between Board Composition and the Ratings Given to Green Bonds: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 126-126, June.
    16. Lucrezia Songini & Anna Pistoni & Patrizia Tettamanzi & Fabrizio Fratini & Valentina Minutiello, 2022. "Integrated reporting quality and BoD characteristics: an empirical analysis," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(2), pages 579-620, June.
    17. Sara De Masi, 2021. "Boards Contributing to the Protection of the Environment: Looking at the Dynamics between In-groups and Out-groups," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 12(2), pages 76-88, April.
    18. Felipe Arenas-Torres & Miguel Bustamante-Ubilla & Valentín Santander-Ramírez & Pedro Severino-González, 2022. "Diversity and Governance: Is There Really Progress?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.
    19. Stefania Veltri & Romilda Mazzotta & Franco Ernesto Rubino, 2021. "Board diversity and corporate social performance: Does the family firm status matter?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1664-1679, November.
    20. Elisa Menicucci & Guido Paolucci, 2022. "Board Diversity and ESG Performance: Evidence from the Italian Banking Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:828-:d:481177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.