IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v31y2022i3p649-661.html

Walking the talk about corporate social responsibility communication: An elaboration likelihood model perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Anthony Camilleri

Abstract

Large organizations, including listed businesses, financial service providers as well as public services entities are increasingly disclosing information on their environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues through corporate websites or via social media. Therefore, this research uses valid measures from the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) to explore the individuals’ attitudes toward online corporate social responsibility (CSR) communications. The data were gathered from a structured questionnaire among three hundred ninety‐two respondents (n = 392). A structural equations modeling partial least squares (SEM‐PLS 3) approach was used to analyze the data. The findings revealed that the timeliness, relevance and accuracy of information as well as the source expertise were highly significant antecedents that were affecting the research participants’ attitudes toward CSR communications. This contribution implies that there is scope for content curators to publish quality online information on their business activities to improve their trustworthiness and positive credentials among stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2022. "Walking the talk about corporate social responsibility communication: An elaboration likelihood model perspective," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 649-661, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:31:y:2022:i:3:p:649-661
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.12427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12427
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.12427?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Newell, Stephen J. & Goldsmith, Ronald E., 2001. "The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 235-247, June.
    2. Jane Davison, 2008. "Rhetoric, repetition, reporting and the “dot.com” era: words, pictures, intangibles," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(6), pages 791-826, August.
    3. Johanna Jauernig & Vladislav Valentinov, 2019. "CSR as hypocrisy avoidance: a conceptual framework," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(1), pages 2-25, February.
    4. Allison, Thomas H. & Davis, Blakley C. & Webb, Justin W. & Short, Jeremy C., 2017. "Persuasion in crowdfunding: An elaboration likelihood model of crowdfunding performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 707-725.
    5. MacKenzie, Scott B. & Podsakoff, Philip M., 2012. "Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 542-555.
    6. Patrick Pelsmacker & Wim Janssens, 2007. "A Model for Fair Trade Buying Behaviour: The Role of Perceived Quantity and Quality of Information and of Product-specific Attitudes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 361-380, November.
    7. Diana Ingenhoff & Katharina Sommer, 2010. "Trust in Companies and in CEOs: A Comparative Study of the Main Influences," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 339-355, September.
    8. MaryAnn Reynolds & Kristi Yuthas, 2008. "Moral Discourse and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 78(1), pages 47-64, March.
    9. Stephanie Watts Sussman & Wendy Schneier Siegal, 2003. "Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 47-65, March.
    10. Barbara H. Wixom & Peter A. Todd, 2005. "A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 85-102, March.
    11. Cho, Charles H. & Laine, Matias & Roberts, Robin W. & Rodrigue, Michelle, 2015. "Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 78-94.
    12. Dima Jamali, 2008. "A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: A Fresh Perspective into Theory and Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 213-231, September.
    13. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    14. Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2017. "Corporate citizenship and social responsibility policies in the United States of America," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(1), pages 77-93, March.
    15. Robert G. Eccles & Michael P. Krzus & Sydney Ribot, 2015. "Meaning and Momentum in the Integrated Reporting Movement," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 27(2), pages 8-17, June.
    16. Petty, Richard E & Cacioppo, John T & Schumann, David, 1983. "Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(2), pages 135-146, September.
    17. Johanna Jauernig & Vladislav Valentinov, 2019. "CSR as hypocrisy avoidance: a conceptual framework," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(1), pages 2-25, February.
    18. Sora Kim, 2019. "The Process Model of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Communication: CSR Communication and its Relationship with Consumers’ CSR Knowledge, Trust, and Corporate Reputation Perception," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(4), pages 1143-1159, February.
    19. Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2015. "Environmental, social and governance disclosures in Europe," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(2), pages 224-242, May.
    20. Filieri, Raffaele, 2015. "What makes online reviews helpful? A diagnosticity-adoption framework to explain informational and normative influences in e-WOM," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1261-1270.
    21. Tseng, Shun-Yao & Wang, Ching-Nan, 2016. "Perceived risk influence on dual-route information adoption processes on travel websites," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2289-2296.
    22. Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2017. "Corporate citizenship and social responsibility policies in the United States of America," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(1), pages 77-93, March.
    23. Jane Davison, 2008. "Rhetoric, repetition, reporting and the “dot.com” era: words, pictures, intangibles," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(6), pages 791-826, August.
    24. Ismagilova, Elvira & Slade, Emma & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2020. "The effect of characteristics of source credibility on consumer behaviour: A meta-analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    25. Carmelo Reverte, 2009. "Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Ratings by Spanish Listed Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(2), pages 351-366, August.
    26. Nicolas Garcia‐Torea & Belen Fernandez‐Feijoo & Marta De La Cuesta, 2020. "CSR reporting communication: Defective reporting models or misapplication?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 952-968, March.
    27. António Dias & Lúcia Lima Rodrigues & Russell Craig, 2016. "Global financial crisis and corporate social responsibility disclosure," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(4), pages 654-671, October.
    28. Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2015. "Environmental, social and governance disclosures in Europe," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(2), pages 224-242, May.
    29. Geert Demuijnck & Björn Fasterling, 2016. "The Social License to Operate," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(4), pages 675-685, July.
    30. Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2017. "Case Study 1: Corporate Citizenship and Social Responsibility Policies in America," Springer Books, in: Corporate Sustainability, Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, chapter 0, pages 99-117, Springer.
    31. Bin Gu & Prabhudev Konana & Balaji Rajagopalan & Hsuan-Wei Michelle Chen, 2007. "Competition Among Virtual Communities and User Valuation: The Case of Investing-Related Communities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 68-85, March.
    32. António Dias & Lúcia Lima Rodrigues & Russell Craig, 2016. "Global financial crisis and corporate social responsibility disclosure," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(4), pages 654-671, October.
    33. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570810893254 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khemani, Purnima & Kumar, Dilip, 2025. "Do opposites attract? Understanding the influence of infographics and message credibility on investor perceptions and decision-making," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    2. Wenjiao Wang & Ziyuan Sun & Yuting Dong & Longyu Zhang, 2025. "Cost of debt financing, stock returns, and corporate strategic ESG disclosure: Evidence from China," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 1787-1812, October.
    3. Ziyuan Sun & Xiao Sun & Wenjiao Wang & Wei Wang, 2025. "Digital transformation and greenwashing in environmental, social, and governance disclosure: Does investor attention matter?," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 81-102, January.
    4. Camila Kolling & José Luis Duarte Ribeiro, 2025. "Leveraging Product Labels for Sustainable Consumption: Circular Economy, Corporate Social Responsibility, and ESG Messaging on Consumers' Purchase Decisions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(5), pages 5713-5733, September.
    5. Giuseppe Nicolo & Giovanni Zampone & Giuseppe Sannino & Paolo Tartaglia Polcini, 2025. "Ready for Change After the Omnibus Package? Early Compliance With the European Sustainability Reporting Standards and Its Key Determinants in the New Regulatory Era," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7), pages 9040-9058, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abd Alwahed Dagestani & Ibrahim Alnafrah & Luboš Smutka & Yuriy Bilan & Pengyu Chen, 2025. "Greenwashing and stakeholder theory in China: an empirical evidence of corporate social responsibility and firms performance," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(9), pages 21683-21708, September.
    2. Halder, Deepa & Pradhan, Debasis & Roy Chaudhuri, Himadri, 2021. "Forty-five years of celebrity credibility and endorsement literature: Review and learnings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 397-415.
    3. Giuseppe Nicolo & Giovanni Zampone & Giuseppe Sannino & Paolo Tartaglia Polcini, 2025. "Ready for Change After the Omnibus Package? Early Compliance With the European Sustainability Reporting Standards and Its Key Determinants in the New Regulatory Era," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7), pages 9040-9058, November.
    4. Rosillo-Díaz, Elena & Muñoz-Rosas, Juan Francisco & Blanco-Encomienda, Francisco Javier, 2024. "Impact of heuristic–systematic cues on the purchase intention of the electronic commerce consumer through the perception of product quality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Pham Minh & Dang Thao Yen & Ngo Thi Huong Quynh & Hoang Thi Hong Yen & Tran Thi Thanh Nga & Nguyen Van Quoc, 2021. "Assessment of influencer’s effects on customers’ online purchasing behavior in Vietnam," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 11(2), pages 81-96.
    6. María Luisa Pajuelo Moreno & Teresa Duarte-Atoche, 2019. "Relationship between Sustainable Disclosure and Performance—An Extension of Ullmann’s Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    7. Tsai-Ling Liu & Tyrone T. Lin & Shu-Yen Hsu, 2022. "Continuance Usage Intention toward E-Payment during the COVID-19 Pandemic from the Financial Sustainable Development Perspective Using Perceived Usefulness and Electronic Word of Mouth as Mediators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-23, June.
    8. R. Filieri & F. Acikgoz & D. Hao, 2023. "Electronic word-of-mouth from video bloggers: The role of content quality and source homophily across hedonic and utilitarian products," Post-Print hal-04713695, HAL.
    9. Prerna Garg & Anoop Pandey, 2023. "Decomposing the Effect of Brand Image in Influencing Information Adoption: The Case of Online Travel Agents," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 11(1), pages 11-27, January.
    10. Rubina Michela Galeotti & Mark Anthony Camilleri & Fabiana Roberto & Fabiana Sepe, 2025. "Stakeholder engagement disclosures in sustainability reports: Evidence from Italian food companies," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 260-279, January.
    11. Angelis-Evangelos Papadopoulos & Panagiotis Arsenos & Nicos Sykianakis & Dimitrios Stavroulakis, 2025. "Embedding Corporate Social Responsibility in Retail Strategy: Strategic, Sustainable, and Localized Approaches to Building Brand Equity and Loyalty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Akanksha Shukla & Geetika & Nimesh Shukla, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility Measures: A Brief Review," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 10(1), pages 101-120, January.
    13. Hsiao, Chun Hua & Yang, Chyan, 2011. "The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: A co-citation analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 128-136.
    14. Onofrei, George & Filieri, Raffaele & Kennedy, Lorraine, 2022. "Social media interactions, purchase intention, and behavioural engagement: The mediating role of source and content factors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 100-112.
    15. Betty Purwandari & Latifatul Khairiyah & Mardiana Purwaningsih & Achmad Nizar Hidayanto & Nur Fitriah Ayuning Budi & Kongkiti Phusavat, 2023. "Why do people donate online? A perspective from dual credibility transfer," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 20(2), pages 393-425, June.
    16. Vaz Ogando, Natalia & Ruiz Blanco, Silvia & Fernandez-Feijoo Souto, Belen, 2018. "El mercado de verificación de las memorias de sostenibilidad en España: un análisis desde la perspectiva de la demanda," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 48-62.
    17. Ọláyẹmí M. Ọlábìyí & Jasmine Alam, 2025. "Making money move: an analysis of corporate social responsibility activities in money transfer firms," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    18. G. Onofrei & R. Filieri & L. Kennedy, 2022. "Social media interactions, purchase intention, and behavioural engagement on social networking platforms: The mediating role of source and content factors," Post-Print hal-04779119, HAL.
    19. Bressan, Alessandro & Duarte Alonso, Abel & Thi Kim Vu, Oanh, 2023. "Business-community relations under COVID-19: A study of micro and small firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PA).
    20. Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Nazim Hussain & Cristina Aibar‐Guzmán & Beatriz Aibar‐Guzmán, 2022. "Assurance of corporate social responsibility reports: Does it reduce decoupling practices?," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 118-138, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:31:y:2022:i:3:p:649-661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.