IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v31y2022i2p363-385.html

Blame and culpability in explaining changes in perceptions of corporate social responsibility and credibility

Author

Listed:
  • Nizar Souiden
  • Walid Chaouali
  • Joaquín Aldás‐Manzano
  • Dima Rachid Jamali

Abstract

This study uses the sequential updating mechanism and draws on several theories, such as the attribution theory, the self‐perception theory and the shame theory, to explain the interplay between consumers' perceptions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate credibility. It contends that both CSR and corporate credibility undergo the sequential updating mechanism. A two‐stage model (before and after a corporate public relation [PR] crisis) is used to investigate how individuals' perceptions of CSR and credibility are determined by their blame attribution to the firm, their self‐culpability, as well as their prior perceptions of CSR and credibility. To test the research hypotheses, four samples were collected from Spain (224 and 244) and the United Kingdom (307 and 236). Respondents had to state their opinions in relation to a Spanish and a British company operating in the fashion industry. For the model estimation, the SmartPLS 3 was used. The results show that consumers' perception of a firm's liability has a significant impact on their feeling of culpability, which in turn strongly and negatively affects their perceptions of the firm's CSR and credibility. In addition, consumers' prior perceptions of CSR and credibility play a relevant role in regulating and offsetting the final effect of a corporate PR crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Nizar Souiden & Walid Chaouali & Joaquín Aldás‐Manzano & Dima Rachid Jamali, 2022. "Blame and culpability in explaining changes in perceptions of corporate social responsibility and credibility," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 363-385, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:31:y:2022:i:2:p:363-385
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.12417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12417
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.12417?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Newell, Stephen J. & Goldsmith, Ronald E., 2001. "The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 235-247, June.
    2. Won-Moo Hur & Hanna Kim & Jeong Woo, 2014. "How CSR Leads to Corporate Brand Equity: Mediating Mechanisms of Corporate Brand Credibility and Reputation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 75-86, November.
    3. Tiago Melo & Alvaro Garrido‐Morgado, 2012. "Corporate Reputation: A Combination of Social Responsibility and Industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 11-31, January.
    4. Xueming Luo & Shuili Du, 2015. "Exploring the relationship between corporate social responsibility and firm innovation," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 703-714, December.
    5. Martin R. Zemborain & Gita Venkataramani Johar, 2007. "Attitudinal Ambivalence and Openness to Persuasion: A Framework for Interpersonal Influence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(4), pages 506-514, December.
    6. Bolton, Lisa E. & Mattila, Anna S., 2015. "How Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect Consumer Response to Service Failure in Buyer–Seller Relationships?," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 140-153.
    7. Kaung-Hwa Chen & Feng-Hsiang Chang & Yu-Ling Chen & Pei-Ming Chen, 2019. "The Relationships between Corporate Credibility, Service Convenience, and Consumers’ Use Intentions: Toward Ticketing Apps for Low-Cost Carriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    8. repec:tsa:wpaper:0040mkt is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Koenig, Pamina & Poncet, Sandra, 2019. "Social responsibility scandals and trade," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Folkes, Valerie S, 1984. "Consumer Reactions to Product Failure: An Attributional Approach," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(4), pages 398-409, March.
    11. Folkes, Valerie S, 1988. "Recent Attribution Research in Consumer Behavior: A Review and New Directions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 14(4), pages 548-565, March.
    12. Sergio Carvalho & Etayankara Muralidharan & Hari Bapuji, 2015. "Corporate Social ‘Irresponsibility’: Are Consumers’ Biases in Attribution of Blame Helping Companies in Product–Harm Crises Involving Hybrid Products?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(3), pages 651-663, September.
    13. Janssen, Catherine & Sen, Sankar & Bhattacharya, CB, 2015. "Corporate crises in the age of corporate social responsibility," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 183-192.
    14. Dumitrescu, Claudia & Hughner, Renée Shaw & Shultz, Clifford J., 2018. "Examining consumers' responses to corporate social responsibility addressing childhood obesity: The mediating role of attributional judgments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 132-140.
    15. Sonja Lyubomirsky & Heidi Lepper, 1999. "A Measure of Subjective Happiness: Preliminary Reliability and Construct Validation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 137-155, February.
    16. Paolo Antonetti & Stan Maklan, 2016. "An Extended Model of Moral Outrage at Corporate Social Irresponsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 429-444, May.
    17. Abagail McWilliams & Donald S. Siegel & Patrick M. Wright, 2006. "Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 1-18, January.
    18. Sung S. Kim & Naresh K. Malhotra, 2005. "A Longitudinal Model of Continued IS Use: An Integrative View of Four Mechanisms Underlying Postadoption Phenomena," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 741-755, May.
    19. Catherine Janssen & Sankar Sen & Cb Bhattacharya, 2015. "Corporate crises in the age of corporate social responsibility," Post-Print hal-01563031, HAL.
    20. Choi, Sunmee & Mattila, Anna S., 2008. "Perceived controllability and service expectations: Influences on customer reactions following service failure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 24-30, January.
    21. Schlägel, Christopher & Sarstedt, Marko, 2016. "Assessing the measurement invariance of the four-dimensional cultural intelligence scale across countries: A composite model approach," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 633-649.
    22. Chi-Shiun Lai & Chih-Jen Chiu & Chin-Fang Yang & Da-Chang Pai, 2010. "The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Brand Performance: The Mediating Effect of Industrial Brand Equity and Corporate Reputation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 457-469, September.
    23. de Campos Ribeiro, Gisèle & Butori, Raphaëlle & Le Nagard, Emmanuelle, 2018. "The determinants of approval of online consumer revenge," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 212-221.
    24. Raju, Sekar & Rajagopal, Priyali & Murdock, Mitchel R., 2021. "The moderating effects of prior trust on consumer responses to firm failures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 24-37.
    25. Inoue, Yuhei & Funk, Daniel C. & McDonald, Heath, 2017. "Predicting behavioral loyalty through corporate social responsibility: The mediating role of involvement and commitment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 46-56.
    26. Johar, Gita V. & Sengupta, Jaideep & Aaker, Jennifer L., 2005. "Two Roads to Updating Brand Personality Impressions: Trait versus Evaluative Inferencing," Research Papers 1884r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    27. Weiner, Bernard, 2000. "Attributional Thoughts about Consumer Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(3), pages 382-387, December.
    28. Vaidyanathan, Rajiv & Aggarwal, Praveen, 2003. "Who is the fairest of them all? An attributional approach to price fairness perceptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 453-463, June.
    29. Giovanni Luigi Fontana & José Antonio Miranda, 2016. "The business of fashion in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries," Investigaciones de Historia Económica - Economic History Research (IHE-EHR), Journal of the Spanish Economic History Association, Asociación Española de Historia Económica, vol. 12(02), pages 68-75.
    30. Stephen M. Garcia & Patricia Chen & Matthew T. Gordon, 2014. "The letter versus the spirit of the law: A lay perspective on culpability," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 9(5), pages 479-490, September.
    31. Ariely, Dan, 2000. "Controlling the Information Flow: Effects on Consumers' Decision Making and Preferences," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(2), pages 233-248, September.
    32. Garcia, Stephen M. & Chen, Patricia & Gordon, Matthew T., 2014. "The letter versus the spirit of the law: A lay perspective on culpability," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(5), pages 479-490, September.
    33. Laufer, Daniel & Coombs, W. Timothy, 2006. "How should a company respond to a product harm crisis? The role of corporate reputation and consumer-based cues," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 49(5), pages 379-385.
    34. Lafferty, Barbara A. & Goldsmith, Ronald E., 1999. "Corporate Credibility's Role in Consumers' Attitudes and Purchase Intentions When a High versus a Low Credibility Endorser Is Used in the Ad," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 109-116, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alberto Ferraris & Ismail Golgeci & Ahmad Arslan & Gabriele Santoro, 2024. "Understanding the link between subsidiary CEOs and corporate social responsibility in emerging markets: Moderating role of social capital," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 80-93, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tom Joonhwan Kim & Youjae Yi & Jongan Choi, 2020. "The boomerang effect of brand personality congruency in a product-harm crisis," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(4), pages 645-661, November.
    2. Nick Lin-Hi & Igor Blumberg, 2018. "The Link Between (Not) Practicing CSR and Corporate Reputation: Psychological Foundations and Managerial Implications," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 185-198, June.
    3. Chang-Dae Ham & Jeesun Kim, 2019. "The Role of CSR in Crises: Integration of Situational Crisis Communication Theory and the Persuasion Knowledge Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 353-372, August.
    4. Rajesh Sharma & Vranda Jain, 2019. "CSR, Trust, Brand Loyalty and Brand Equity: Empirical Evidences from Sportswear Industry in the NCR Region of India," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 18(1), pages 57-67, June.
    5. Choi, Sunmee & Mattila, Anna S., 2008. "Perceived controllability and service expectations: Influences on customer reactions following service failure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 24-30, January.
    6. Wenbin Sun & Rahul Govind, 2022. "A New Understanding of Marketing and “Doing Good”: Marketing’s Power in the TMT and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 89-109, February.
    7. Hsu, Liwu & Lawrence, Benjamin, 2016. "The role of social media and brand equity during a product recall crisis: A shareholder value perspective," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 59-77.
    8. Kim, Junghyun & Park, Taehoon, 2020. "How corporate social responsibility (CSR) saves a company: The role of gratitude in buffering vindictive consumer behavior from product failures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 461-472.
    9. Giovanna Gavana & Pietro Gottardo & Anna Maria Moisello, 2018. "Do Customers Value CSR Disclosure? Evidence from Italian Family and Non-Family Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Min, Jihye & Kim, Jiyoung & Yang, Kiseol, 2023. "CSR attributions and the moderating effect of perceived CSR fit on consumer trust, identification, and loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    11. Francisco Javier Forcadell & Elisa Aracil, 2017. "European Banks' Reputation for Corporate Social Responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1), pages 1-14, January.
    12. Won‐Moo Hur & Tae‐Won Moon & Hanna Kim, 2020. "When and how does customer engagement in CSR initiatives lead to greater CSR participation? The role of CSR credibility and customer–company identification," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1878-1891, July.
    13. Anne-Kathrin Ulke & Laura Marie Schons, 2016. "CSR as a Selling of Indulgences: An Experimental Investigation of Customers’ Perceptions of CSR Activities Depending on Corporate Reputation," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 263-280, October.
    14. Jessica Mikeska & Elise Johansen Harvey, 2015. "The Political CEO: An Event Study Comparing Consumer Attributions of CEO Behavior," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 96(1), pages 76-92, March.
    15. Davoud Nikbin & Ishak Ismail & Malliga Marimuthu, 2013. "The relationship between informational justice, recovery satisfaction, and loyalty: the moderating role of failure attributions," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 7(3), pages 419-435, September.
    16. Zhe Ouyang & Ruixue Lv & Yang Liu, 2023. "Can corporate social responsibility protect firm value during corporate environmental violation events?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1942-1952, July.
    17. Paydas Turan, Ceyda, 2022. "Deal or deny: The effectiveness of crisis response strategies on brand equity of the focal brand in co-branding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 615-629.
    18. Gao, Hongzhi & Knight, John G. & Zhang, Hongxia & Mather, Damien, 2013. "Guilt by association: Heuristic risks for foreign brands during a product-harm crisis in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1044-1051.
    19. J. Alfredo Flores‐Hernández & Jesús J. Cambra‐Fierro & Rosario Vázquez‐Carrasco, 2020. "Sustainability, brand image, reputation and financial value: Manager perceptions in an emerging economy context," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 935-945, July.
    20. Eun‐Mi Lee & Irenna Elizabeth, 2026. "CSR Under Fire: Can Corporate Responsibility Defuse Consumer Anger Over Product Failures in Controversial and Uncontroversial Industries?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 2347-2359, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:31:y:2022:i:2:p:363-385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.