IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apecpp/v48y2026i2p462-472.html

Changes to Hog Formulas: Swapping Negotiated Hogs With Pork Cutout Values

Author

Listed:
  • David Boussios
  • Brenda Boetel
  • Tanner McCarty

Abstract

Since 2019, negotiated and formula hog values have increasingly diverged. Using rolling regression models, we demonstrate that the divergence is likely due to a switch from using negotiated hog values to using pork prices for valuing formula hogs, limiting the previously theorized impacts of thin negotiated hog markets on producer welfare. The change in the formulas raises timely questions about the thinness of wholesale pork markets, risk sharing through public information, and transparency in formula pricing.

Suggested Citation

  • David Boussios & Brenda Boetel & Tanner McCarty, 2026. "Changes to Hog Formulas: Swapping Negotiated Hogs With Pork Cutout Values," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(2), pages 462-472, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:48:y:2026:i:2:p:462-472
    DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70044
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/aepp.70044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:48:y:2026:i:2:p:462-472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2040-5804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.