IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/ajagec/v107y2025i4p1152-1182.html

Mapping agents: A spatial economic analysis of agent location in the Federal Crop Insurance Program

Author

Listed:
  • Nathan D. DeLay
  • Cory G. Walters

Abstract

Crop insurance is delivered to farmers and ranchers through a partnership among the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC), part of the United States Department of Agriculture, and the crop insurance industry. The FCIC offers financial incentives, through reinsurance and subsidies, to private insurance companies for insurance contracts sold in accordance with the Standard Reinsurance Agreement (SRA). Crop insurance agents play an important role in the delivery of the federal crop insurance program, acting as intermediaries between farmers and crop insurance companies. Little is understood about the supply of crop insurance agents and the role of government policy in the provision of agent services, particularly after the 2010 SRA. We model the equilibrium supply of crop insurance agents to derive testable hypotheses about the factors that influence agent concentration across space. We evaluate our model using spatial econometric techniques and a novel dataset of crop insurance agent locations by county. Generally, forces that raise agent compensation, including the degree of competition among insurance companies, are shown to increase the local supply of agents. Results vary by government‐defined reinsurance regions. Notably, historical average premium rates, which both reflect actuarial risk and influence farmer insurance demand, are negatively related to agent competition in the low‐risk Group 1 states, which contributes over 40% of insured liabilities. These factors produce spatial spillovers, suggesting the presence of agglomeration effects in the market for agent services. Proposed changes to the SRA should consider impacts on the regional distribution and local supply of agents.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathan D. DeLay & Cory G. Walters, 2025. "Mapping agents: A spatial economic analysis of agent location in the Federal Crop Insurance Program," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 107(4), pages 1152-1182, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:ajagec:v:107:y:2025:i:4:p:1152-1182
    DOI: 10.1111/ajae.12503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12503
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ajae.12503?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taro Mieno & Cory G Walters & Lilyan E Fulginiti, 2018. "Input Use under Crop Insurance: The Role of Actual Production History," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 100(5), pages 1469-1485.
    2. Jennifer E Ifft & Todd Kuethe & Mitch Morehart, 2015. "Does federal crop insurance lead to higher farm debt use? Evidence from the Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS)," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 75(3), pages 349-367, September.
    3. Lambert, Dayton M. & McNamara, Kevin T. & Garrett, Megan I., 2006. "An Application of Spatial Poisson Models to Manufacturing Investment Location Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 38(01), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Francis Annan & Wolfram Schlenker, 2015. "Federal Crop Insurance and the Disincentive to Adapt to Extreme Heat," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 262-266, May.
    5. Jeremy G. Weber & Nigel Key & Erik O’Donoghue, 2016. "Does Federal Crop Insurance Make Environmental Externalities from Agriculture Worse?," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 3(3), pages 707-742.
    6. Murat Isik, 2004. "Environmental Regulation and the Spatial Structure of the U.S. Dairy Sector," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(4), pages 949-962.
    7. Jennifer E Ifft & Todd Kuethe & Mitch Morehart, 2015. "Does federal crop insurance lead to higher farm debt use? Evidence from the Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS)," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 75(3), pages 349-367, September.
    8. Smith, Vincent H. & Glauber, Joseph W. & Dismukes, Robert, 2016. "Rent Dispersion in the US Agricultural Insurance Industry," IFPRI discussion papers 1532, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Tsiboe, Francis & Turner, Dylan, 2023. "The crop insurance demand response to premium subsidies: Evidence from U.S. Agriculture," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Vuong, Quang H, 1989. "Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-nested Hypotheses," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 307-333, March.
    11. Getu Hailu & B. James Deaton, 2016. "Agglomeration Effects in Ontario’s Dairy Farming," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(4), pages 1055-1073.
    12. Barry K. Goodwin, 1993. "An Empirical Analysis of the Demand for Multiple Peril Crop Insurance," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 75(2), pages 425-434.
    13. Ifft, Jennifer & Kuethe, Todd & Morehart, Mitch, 2015. "Does Federal Crop Insurance lead to higher farm debt use? Evidence from the Agricultural Resource Management Survey," Working Papers 250011, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    14. Ker, Alan P. & McGowan, Pat, 2000. "Weather-Based Adverse Selection And The U.S. Crop Insurance Program: The Private Insurance Company Perspective," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 25(2), pages 1-25, December.
    15. Rejesus, Roderick M. & Little, Bertis B. & Lovell, Ashley C. & Cross, Mike H. & Shucking, Michael, 2004. "Patterns of Collusion in the U.S. Crop Insurance Program: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 36(2), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Keith H. Coble & Robert Dismukes & Joseph W. Glauber, 2007. "Private Crop Insurers and the Reinsurance Fund Allocation Decision," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 89(3), pages 582-595.
    17. Carl Gaigné & Julie Le Gallo & Solène Larue & Bertrand Schmitt, 2012. "Does Regulation of Manure Land Application Work Against Agglomeration Economies? Theory and Evidence from the French Hog Sector," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 94(1), pages 116-132.
    18. Joseph W. Glauber, 2004. "Crop Insurance Reconsidered," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(5), pages 1179-1195.
    19. Brian Roe & Elena G. Irwin & Jeff S. Sharp, 2002. "Pigs in Space: Modeling the Spatial Structure of Hog Production in Traditional and Nontraditional Production Regions," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 84(2), pages 259-278.
    20. Pearcy, Jason & Smith, Vincent H., 2015. "The Tangled Web of Agricultural Insurance: Evaluating the Impacts of Government Policy," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 40(01), pages 1-32.
    21. repec:oup:ajagec:v:99:y:2017:i:1:p:1-18. is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Mckinley L. Blackburn, 2015. "The Relative Performance of Poisson and Negative Binomial Regression Estimators," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 77(4), pages 605-616, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nathan D. DeLay & Hayley H. Chouinard & Cory G. Walters & Philip R. Wandschneider, 2020. "The influence of crop insurance agents on coverage choices: The role of agent competition," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(4), pages 623-638, July.
    2. Pardeshi, Shefali & Loughrey, Jason & O'Connor, Declan, . "Farm Investment and Adoption of Fixed Milk Price Contracts on Irish Dairy Farms," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 73(1).
    3. Nathan D. DeLay & Brady Brewer & Allen Featherstone & David Boussios, 2023. "The impact of crop insurance on farm financial outcomes," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(1), pages 579-601, March.
    4. Delay, Nathan & Chouinard, Hayley & Walters, Cory & Wandschneider, Philip, "undated". "Examining the Role of the Crop Insurance Selling Agent," Cornhusker Economics 307133, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    5. Smith, Vincent H. & Glauber, Joseph W. & Dismukes, Robert, 2016. "Rent Dispersion in the US Agricultural Insurance Industry," IFPRI discussion papers 1532, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. Sarker, Rakhal, 2024. "Farm Policy Support Payments and Risk Balancing Phenomenon in Grain and Oilseed Sector in Ontario, Canada," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344398, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).
    7. Rakhal Sarker & Truc Phan & Yu Na Lee & Alfons Weersink, 2022. "Business Risk Management Program and risk‐balancing in Ontario hog sector: An empirical analysis," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 70(4), pages 287-304, December.
    8. Fuad, Syed & Hartarska, Valentina & Nadolnyak, Denis, 2026. "Why Beginning Farmers Differ: Scale, Community, and Productivity Dispersion in U.S. Agriculture," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404709, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Cai, Rong & Ma, Jie & Wang, Shujuan & Cai, Shukai, 2024. "Access to credit and scale efficiency: Evidence from family farms in East China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1538-1551.
    10. Belasco, Eric J., 2020. "WAEA Presidential Address: Moving Agricultural Policy Forward: Or, There and Back Again," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 45(3), September.
    11. Gohin, Alex, 2017. "Macroeconomic impacts of the U.S. farm policy: a second best assessment," Conference papers 332819, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    12. Emin Allahverdiyev & Xudong Rao & Andres Trujillo-Barrera, 2025. "Farm liquidity and business risk from the risk balancing perspective: evidence from selected U.S. states," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 49(3), pages 710-732, September.
    13. Abay Mulatu & Ada Wossink, 2014. "Environmental Regulation and Location of Industrialized Agricultural Production in Europe," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 90(3), pages 509-537.
    14. Ifft, Jennifer & Jodlowski, Margaret, "undated". "Federal crop insurance and agricultural credit use," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 259120, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Azzam, Azzeddine & Walters, Cory & Kaus, Taylor, 2021. "Does subsidized crop insurance affect farm industry structure? Lessons from the U.S," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 1167-1180.
    16. Fertő, Imre & Csonka, Arnold, 2017. "Válság- és agglomerációs hatások a magyarországi sertéstartásban [Crisis and agglomeration in Hungary s pig production]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 105-122.
    17. Tsiboe, Francis & Turner, Dylan, 2023. "The crop insurance demand response to premium subsidies: Evidence from U.S. Agriculture," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    18. Aaron De Laporte & Daniel Schuurman & Tristan Skolrud & Peter Slade & Alfons Weersink, 2024. "Business risk management programs and the adoption of beneficial management practices in Canadian crop agriculture," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 72(3), pages 309-324, September.
    19. Yuan, Lingran & Zhang, Qizheng & Wang, Shuo & Hu, Weibin & Gong, Binlei, 2022. "Effects of international trade on world agricultural production and productivity: evidence from a panel of 126 countries 1962-2014," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(2), March.
    20. Gong, Binlei, 2018. "Interstate competition in agriculture: Cheer or fear? Evidence from the United States and China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 37-47.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:ajagec:v:107:y:2025:i:4:p:1152-1182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8276 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.