IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ecm/emetrp/v57y1989i2p307-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-nested Hypotheses

Author

Listed:
  • Vuong, Quang H

Abstract

Using the Kullback-Leibler information criterion to measure the closeness of a model to the truth, the author proposes new likelihood-ratio-based statistics for testing the null hypothesis that the competing models are as close to the true data generating process against the alternative hypothesis that one model is closer. The tests are directional and are derived for the cases where the competing models are non-nested, overlapping, or nested and whether both, one, or neither is misspecified. As a prerequisite, the author fully characterizes the asymptotic distribution of the likelihood ratio statistic under the most general conditions. Copyright 1989 by The Econometric Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Vuong, Quang H, 1989. "Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-nested Hypotheses," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 307-333, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecm:emetrp:v:57:y:1989:i:2:p:307-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0012-9682%28198903%2957%3A2%3C307%3ALRTFMS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-J&origin=repec
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:emetrp:v:57:y:1989:i:2:p:307-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.