IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jagaec/v36y2004i02p449-465_02.html

Patterns of Collusion in the U.S. Crop Insurance Program: An Empirical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Rejesus, Roderick M.
  • Little, Bertis B.
  • Lovell, Ashley C.
  • Cross, Mike
  • Shucking, Michael

Abstract

This article analyzes anomalous patterns of agent, adjuster, and producer claim outcomes and determines the most likely pattern of collusion that is suggestive of fraud, waste, and abuse in the federal crop insurance program. Log–linear analysis of Poisson-distributed counts of anomalous entities is used to examine potential patterns of collusion. The most likely pattern of collusion present in the crop insurance program is where agents, adjusters, and producers nonrecursively interact with each other to coordinate their behavior. However, if a priori an intermediary is known to initiate and coordinate the collusion, a pattern where the producer acts as the intermediary is the most likely pattern of collusion evidenced in the data. These results have important implications for insurance program design and compliance.

Suggested Citation

  • Rejesus, Roderick M. & Little, Bertis B. & Lovell, Ashley C. & Cross, Mike & Shucking, Michael, 2004. "Patterns of Collusion in the U.S. Crop Insurance Program: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(2), pages 449-465, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:36:y:2004:i:02:p:449-465_02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1074070800026730/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rejesus, R. & Park, S. & Zheng, X. & Goodwin, G., 2018. "How does a Fraud Mitigation Program Influence Insurance Claims filing Behavior? Evidence from the "Spot Check List" Program in U.S. Crop Insurance," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277452, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Delay, Nathan & Chouinard, Hayley & Walters, Cory & Wandschneider, Philip, "undated". "Examining the Role of the Crop Insurance Selling Agent," Cornhusker Economics 307133, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    3. Sungkwol Park & Xiaoyong Zheng & Roderick M. Rejesus & Barry K. Goodwin, 2022. "Somebody's watching me! Impacts of the spot check list program in U.S. crop insurance," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(3), pages 921-946, May.
    4. Nathan D. DeLay & Hayley H. Chouinard & Cory G. Walters & Philip R. Wandschneider, 2020. "The influence of crop insurance agents on coverage choices: The role of agent competition," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(4), pages 623-638, July.
    5. Peng, Sheng-Chang & Li, Chu-Shiu, 2024. "Bundled insurance coverage and asymmetric information: Claim patterns of automobile theft insurance in Taiwan," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    6. Pierre Picard, 2025. "Economic Analysis of Insurance Fraud," Springer Books, in: Georges Dionne (ed.), Handbook of Insurance, edition 0, pages 259-323, Springer.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • Q19 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:36:y:2004:i:02:p:449-465_02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.