IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Employment Policy in Small Open Economies

Listed author(s):
  • Markus Marterbauer


The current business cycle outlook for Europe does not suggest that in the near term, unemployment will fall significantly from the high level to which it has risen in the 1993 recession. A major reason is that economic growth is not sufficiently strong for labor demand to outpace labor supply plus productivity. It is mainly on a European level that policy may nowadays shape the forces of growth. Still, small open economies do have some scope for action in employment policy, by influencing the "employment intensity" of growth on the one hand, or the behavior of labor supply, on the other hand. Starting in 1993, Denmark has introduced a number of labor market policy reforms. Among these is the "unpaid leave" model, which has caught considerable attention beyond the national borders. Thereby, employees may take leave for up to one year from their job, be it for further education, child care or a sabbatical (for purposes not further specified). During that time, they may claim 60 to 80 percent of their unemployment insurance entitlements. Their replacement by (long-term) unemployed is subsidized by the public authorities. In the Netherlands, economic growth during the second half of the 1980s was more labor intensive than in most other countries. This was primarily due to a sizeable increase in part-time work. However, the effects on the level of unemployment were negligible. In order to reduce the jobless figure, policy mainly resorted to a relaxing of eligibility criteria for early retirement and disability benefits. The high costs of the latter and their "passive" approach to the problem have prompted reform measures in recent years. Sweden enjoyed full employment and a high degree of labor force participation until the early 1990. Efficient and de-centralized labor market services ensure a smooth exchange of job seekers and vacancies; an elaborate network of training schemes provides access to new qualifications for all unemployed and prevents long-duration joblessness. Wage subsidies and public hiring are targeted towards integrating problem groups (handicapped, youth) into the labor market. In 1991 to 1993 a deep economic and budgetary crisis occured. Unemployment jumped to a rate of 8 percent. In such a situation, active labor market policy, is overburdened with the task of fighting the large cyclical part of unemployment.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: Abstract
Download Restriction: Payment required

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by WIFO in its journal WIFO-Monatsberichte.

Volume (Year): 69 (1996)
Issue (Month): 1 (January)
Pages: 61-68

in new window

Handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:1996:i:1:p:61-68
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Arsenal Object 20, A-1030 Wien

Phone: (+43 1) 798 26 01-0
Fax: (+43 1) 798 93 86
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

Order Information: Postal: Austrian Institute of Economic Research Publikationsverkauf und Abonnentenbetreuung Arsenal, Objekt 20 A-1030 Vienna/Austria

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:1996:i:1:p:61-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ilse Schulz)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.