Unemployment and External and Internal Labor Market Flexibility: A Comparative View of Europe, Japan, and the United States
This paper examines the relationship between unemployment and labor market flexibility. The latter is considered in the broadest sense - as it relates to labor markets at large (external flexibility) and to practices within firms (internal flexibility). The first part of the paper addresses the argument that differences in employment performance among the advanced economies result largely from differences in labor market flexibility. Empirical evidence is considered on nominal and real wage flexibility, labor market institutions, the trade-off between unemployment and inequality (the so-called unified theory), social policy, and Beveridge curves. With the exception of ambiguous evidence on the duration of unemployment insurance benefits, there is little solid evidence that high unemployment results from labor market rigidities. The second part of this paper addresses the argument that Japan's low rate of unemployment results from high internal labor market flexibility. This assertion is suspect, or at least overstated, for several reasons. Japanese firms' reliance on internal flexibility is not an alternative to but rather is complemented by external flexibility. This external flexibility is provided disproportionately by women workers, who serve as a buffer workforce. Rather than being counted as unemployed, Japanese women who lose their jobs tend to leave the labor force altogether. This is manifested in the remarkably high proportions of discouraged workers in Japan, the vast majority of them women. Thus the Japanese unemployment rate as well as unemployment volatility are deceptively low, much more so than for the other advanced economies. Most studies examining wage flexibility in relation to unemployment conclude that wage flexibility is comparatively high in Japan. But studies that examine the relationship between changes in nominal or real wages and output conclude that Japan does not have comparatively high wage flexibility. The point is of relevance not only for the literature on comparative wage flexibility but also for that on labor market institutions and unemployment, in which is is assumed that Japan has comparatively high wage flexibility.
|Date of creation:||Oct 1998|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.economicpolicyresearch.org
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Michael Bruno & Jeffrey D. Sachs, 1985. "Economics of Worldwide Stagflation," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number brun85-1.
- Hamada, Koichi & Kurosaka, Yoshio, 1986. "Trends in Unemployment, Wages and Productivity: The Case of Japan," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 53(210(S)), pages S275-96, Supplemen.
- David G. Blanchflower & Andrew J. Oswald, 1995. "An Introduction to the Wage Curve," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 9(3), pages 153-167, Summer.
- Glyn, Andrew, 1995. "The Assessment: Unemployment and Inequality," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, Spring.
- Richard B. Freeman & Lawrence F. Katz, 1995. "Differences and Changes in Wage Structures," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number free95-1.
- Blondal, Sveinbjorn & Pearson, Mark, 1995. "Unemployment and Other Non-employment Benefits," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 136-69, Spring.
- Hashimoto, Mansanori, 1993. "Aspects of Labor Market Adjustments in Japan," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 11(1), pages 136-61, January.
- Gary Burtless, 1995. "International Trade and the Rise in Earnings Inequality," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 33(2), pages 800-816, June.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epa:cepawp:1998-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bridget Fisher)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.