IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Unemployment and Other Non-employment Benefits

Listed author(s):
  • Blondal, Sveinbjorn
  • Pearson, Mark

Unemployment benefit systems in most OECD countries have become more generous since the early 1960s: the coverage rate has increased, the level of benefits has increased relative to the predisplacement wages, and maximum benefit periods in unemployment-insurance systems have become longer. Moreover, work-availability and willingness-to-work requirements have most likely been enforced less effectively in the high-unemployment environment since the late 1970s. The changes in benefit systems have contributed to higher unemployment, but may also have increased labor-force participation. The article stresses the potential importance of invalidity, early-retirement and sickness benefit systems for labour market outcomes. In half of OECD countries the number of recipients of these benefits exceeds the official numbers of unemployed. Higher replacement ratios in these alternative systems than in unemployment insurance may encourage a migration towards the higher benefit systems, but the extent to which this happens depends on administration of the schemes. Copyright 1995 by Oxford University Press.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Article provided by Oxford University Press in its journal Oxford Review of Economic Policy.

Volume (Year): 11 (1995)
Issue (Month): 1 (Spring)
Pages: 136-169

in new window

Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:11:y:1995:i:1:p:136-69
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:11:y:1995:i:1:p:136-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)

or (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.