IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jpemic/doi10.1086-732653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Cognitive Reflection Relate to Preferences and Socioeconomic Outcomes?

Author

Listed:
  • Frank M. Fossen
  • Levent Neyse
  • Carsten Schröder

Abstract

Previous studies report associations of cognitive reflection, the ability to avoid intuitive but potentially wrong decisions by switching to a contemplative mindset, with individual preferences, mostly relying on student samples and laboratory settings. We assess the association of cognitive reflection with preferences in the general population and real-world socioeconomic outcomes. Our preregistered study tests 16 hypotheses from the literature on the basis of randomly drawn population data and accounting for multiple hypothesis testing. We find that cognitive reflection is significantly associated with interpersonal trust and saving, and suggestively with labor income. We cannot confirm previously reported associations with risk and time preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank M. Fossen & Levent Neyse & Carsten Schröder, 2025. "Does Cognitive Reflection Relate to Preferences and Socioeconomic Outcomes?," Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 3(2), pages 303-343.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jpemic:doi:10.1086/732653
    DOI: 10.1086/732653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/732653
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/732653
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/732653?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jpemic:doi:10.1086/732653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JPEMI .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.