IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/feb/artefa/00612.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Redefine Statistical Significance

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Benjamin
  • James Berger
  • Magnus Johannesson
  • Brian Nosek
  • E. Wagenmakers
  • Richard Berk
  • Kenneth Bollen
  • Bjorn Brembs
  • Lawrence Brown
  • Colin Camerer
  • David Cesarini
  • Christopher Chambers
  • Merlise Clyde
  • Thomas Cook
  • Paul De Boeck
  • Zoltan Dienes
  • Anna Dreber
  • Kenny Easwaran
  • Charles Efferson
  • Ernst Fehr
  • Fiona Fidler
  • Andy Field
  • Malcom Forster
  • Edward George
  • Tarun Ramadorai
  • Richard Gonzalez
  • Steven Goodman
  • Edwin Green
  • Donald Green
  • Anthony Greenwald
  • Jarrod Hadfield
  • Larry Hedges
  • Leonhard Held
  • Teck Hau Ho
  • Herbert Hoijtink
  • James Jones
  • Daniel Hruschka
  • Kosuke Imai
  • Guido Imbens
  • John Ioannidis
  • Minjeong Jeon
  • Michael Kirchler
  • David Laibson
  • John List
  • Roderick Little
  • Arthur Lupia
  • Edouard Machery
  • Scott Maxwell
  • Michael McCarthy
  • Don Moore
  • Stephen Morgan
  • Marcus Munafo
  • Shinichi Nakagawa
  • Brendan Nyhan
  • Timothy Parker
  • Luis Pericchi
  • Marco Perugini
  • Jeff Rouder
  • Judith Rousseau
  • Victoria Savalei
  • Felix Schonbrodt
  • Thomas Sellke
  • Betsy Sinclair
  • Dustin Tingley
  • Trisha Zandt
  • Simine Vazire
  • Duncan Watts
  • Christopher Winship
  • Robert Wolpert
  • Yu Xie
  • Cristobal Young
  • Jonathan Zinman
  • Valen Johnson

Abstract

We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance for claims of new discoveries from 0.05 to 0.005.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Benjamin & James Berger & Magnus Johannesson & Brian Nosek & E. Wagenmakers & Richard Berk & Kenneth Bollen & Bjorn Brembs & Lawrence Brown & Colin Camerer & David Cesarini & Christopher Chambe, 2017. "Redefine Statistical Significance," Artefactual Field Experiments 00612, The Field Experiments Website.
  • Handle: RePEc:feb:artefa:00612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://s3.amazonaws.com/fieldexperiments-papers2/papers/00612.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Camerer, Colin & Dreber, Anna & Forsell, Eskil & Ho, Teck-Hua & Huber, Jurgen & Johannesson, Magnus & Kirchler, Michael & Almenberg, Johan & Altmejd, Adam & Chan, Taizan & Heikensten, Emma & Holzmeist, 2016. "Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in Economics," MPRA Paper 75461, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Blog mentions

    As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. New p-Value Thresholds for Statistical Significance
      by Francis Diebold in No Hesitations on 2017-08-28 04:46:00
    2. [統計][経済][科学]新発見の統計的有意性のp値の閾値は5%から0.5%に下げよ
      by himaginary in himaginaryの日記 on 2017-08-29 05:00:00
    3. More on New p-Value Thresholds
      by Francis Diebold in No Hesitations on 2017-09-04 22:17:00

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lyócsa, Štefan & Výrost, Tomáš & Baumöhl, Eduard, 2019. "Return spillovers around the globe: A network approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 133-146.
    2. Arnold, Gwen & Farrer, Benjamin & Holahan, Robert, 2018. "How do landowners learn about high-volume hydraulic fracturing? A survey of Eastern Ohio landowners in active or proposed drilling units," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 455-464.
    3. Gunter, Ulrich & Önder, Irem & Smeral, Egon, 2019. "Scientific value of econometric tourism demand studies," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Rene Schwaiger & Laura Hueber, 2021. "Do MTurkers Exhibit Myopic Loss Aversion?," Working Papers 2021-12, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck.
    5. Kellner, Ralf & Rösch, Daniel, 2021. "A Bayesian Re-Interpretation of “significant” empirical financial research," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    6. Schwaiger, Rene & Kirchler, Michael & Lindner, Florian & Weitzel, Utz, 2020. "Determinants of investor expectations and satisfaction. A study with financial professionals," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    7. Bickel, David R., 2020. "Departing from Bayesian inference toward minimaxity to the extent that the posterior distribution is unreliable," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    8. Lucio De Capitani & Daniele De Martini, 2021. "Improving reproducibility probability estimation and preserving RP-testing," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(1), pages 49-77, March.
    9. Oluleye, Gbemi & Gandiglio, Marta & Santarelli, Massimo & Hawkes, Adam, 2021. "Pathways to commercialisation of biogas fuelled solid oxide fuel cells in European wastewater treatment plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    10. Camerer, Colin & Dreber, Anna & Holzmeister, Felix & Ho, Teck Hua & Huber, Juergen & Johannesson, Magnus & Kirchler, Michael & Nave, Gideon & Nosek, Brian A. & Pfeiffer, Thomas, 2018. "Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015," SocArXiv 4hmb6, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Omar Al-Ubaydli & John List & Claire Mackevicius & Min Sok Lee & Dana Suskind, 2019. "How Can Experiments Play a Greater Role in Public Policy? 12 Proposals from an Economic Model of Scaling," Artefactual Field Experiments 00679, The Field Experiments Website.
    2. Mueller-Langer, Frank & Andreoli-Versbach, Patrick, 2018. "Open access to research data: Strategic delay and the ambiguous welfare effects of mandatory data disclosure," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 20-34.
    3. Cloos, Janis & Greiff, Matthias & Rusch, Hannes, 2020. "Geographical Concentration and Editorial Favoritism within the Field of Laboratory Experimental Economics (RM/19/029-revised-)," Research Memorandum 014, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    4. Doucouliagos, Hristos & Paldam, Martin & Stanley, T.D., 2018. "Skating on thin evidence: Implications for public policy," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 16-25.
    5. Lucas C. Coffman & Muriel Niederle & Alistair J. Wilson, 2017. "A Proposal to Organize and Promote Replications," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(5), pages 41-45, May.
    6. Bigoni, Maria & Camera, Gabriele & Casari, Marco, 2020. "Money is more than memory," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 99-115.
    7. Roy Chen & Yan Chen & Yohanes E. Riyanto, 2021. "Best practices in replication: a case study of common information in coordination games," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(1), pages 2-30, March.
    8. Okunade, Albert & Osmani, Ahmad, 2020. "Effects of life expectancy on economic growth: New results using the flexible Box-Cox power transformation model," EconStor Open Access Articles, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    9. Camerer, Colin & Dreber, Anna & Holzmeister, Felix & Ho, Teck Hua & Huber, Juergen & Johannesson, Magnus & Kirchler, Michael & Nave, Gideon & Nosek, Brian A. & Pfeiffer, Thomas, 2018. "Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015," SocArXiv 4hmb6, Center for Open Science.
    10. Oliver Schilke & Sheen S. Levine & Olenka Kacperczyk & Lynne G. Zucker, 2019. "Call for Papers-Special Issue on Experiments in Organizational Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 232-234, February.
    11. Özalp Özer & Upender Subramanian & Yu Wang, 2018. "Information Sharing, Advice Provision, or Delegation: What Leads to Higher Trust and Trustworthiness?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 474-493, January.
    12. Adesina, Adedoyin & Akogun, Oladele & Dillon, Andrew & Friedman, Jed & Njobdi, Sani & Serneels, Pieter, 2017. "Robustness and External Validity: What do we Learn from Repeated Study Designs over Time?," 2018 Allied Social Sciences Association (ASSA) Annual Meeting, January 5-7, 2018, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 266292, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Isaiah Andrews & Maximilian Kasy, 2019. "Identification of and Correction for Publication Bias," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(8), pages 2766-2794, August.
    14. Burlig, Fiona, 2018. "Improving transparency in observational social science research: A pre-analysis plan approach," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 56-60.
    15. Mark J. McCabe & Frank Mueller-Langer, 2019. "Does Data Disclosure Increase Citations? Empirical Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Leading Economics Journals," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2019-02, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
    16. Weili Ding, 2020. "Laboratory experiments can pre-design to address power and selection issues," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 6(2), pages 125-138, December.
    17. Maurizio Canavari & Andreas C. Drichoutis & Jayson L. Lusk & Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr., 2018. "How to run an experimental auction: A review of recent advances," Working Papers 2018-5, Agricultural University of Athens, Department Of Agricultural Economics.
    18. Bull, Charles & Courty, Pascal & Doyon, Maurice & Rondeau, Daniel, 2019. "Failure of the Becker–DeGroot–Marschak mechanism in inexperienced subjects: New tests of the game form misconception hypothesis," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 235-253.
    19. Kasy, Maximilian & Frankel, Alexander, 2018. "Which findings should be published?," MetaArXiv mbvz3, Center for Open Science.
    20. Lefgren, Lars J. & Sims, David P. & Stoddard, Olga B., 2016. "Effort, luck, and voting for redistribution," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 89-97.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:feb:artefa:00612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: http://www.fieldexperiments.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joe Seidel The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Joe Seidel to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.fieldexperiments.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.