IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Advertising Restrictions and Competition in the Children’s Breakfast Cereal Industry

  • C. Robert Clark
Registered author(s):

    In this article I analyze the consequences of advertising in the children’s breakfast cereal market. I take advantage of the prohibition on advertising directed at children in the province of Quebec to examine the nature of advertising and to determine whether the restriction hinders competition. I show that prices are higher in Quebec than in Canadian provinces that permit advertising. This finding suggests that the informative role of advertising dominates any persuasive role, since the most likely explanation is that the restriction prevented firms from announcing products' existence or characteristics and thus from overcoming perceived differentiation. If advertising is informative, restricting it should increase the market shares of older, better-known brands and decrease the market shares of newer and/or less well known brands. Empirical analysis supports this prediction: market shares of established brands are larger in Quebec than in the rest of Canada, and the opposite is true for nonestablished brands.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by University of Chicago Press in its journal The Journal of Law and Economics.

    Volume (Year): 50 (2007)
    Issue (Month): ()
    Pages: 757-780

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:v:50:y:2007:p:757-780
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:v:50:y:2007:p:757-780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Journals Division)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.