IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

On the Specification of the Gravity Model of Trade: Zeros, Excess Zeros and Zero-inflated Estimation

Listed author(s):
  • Martijn Burger
  • Frank van Oort
  • Gert-Jan Linders

Abstract Conventional studies of bilateral trade patterns specify a log-normal gravity equation for empirical estimation. However, the log-normal gravity equation suffers from three problems: the bias created by the logarithmic transformation, the failure of the homoskedasticity assumption, and the way zero values are treated. These problems normally result in biased and inefficient estimates. Recently, the Poisson specification of the trade gravity model has received attention as an alternative to the log-normality assumption (Santos Silva & Tenreyro, 2006). However, the standard Poisson model is vulnerable for problems of overdispersion and excess zero flows. To overcome these problems, this paper considers modified Poisson fixed-effects estimations (negative binomial, zero-inflated). Extending the empirical model put forward by Santos Silva & Tenreyro (2006), we show how these techniques may provide viable alternatives to both the log-normal and standard Poisson specification of the gravity model of trade. Caractéristiques du modèle de gravité du commerce: zéros, zéros en excès et estimation du zéro-inflated Résumé Des études conventionnelles sur la structure des échanges commerciaux bilatéraux définissent une équation de gravité log-normale pour estimation empirique. Cependant, l’équation de gravité log-normale souffre de trois problèmes: le biais créé par la transformation logarithmique, l’échec de l'hypothèse d'homoscédasticité, et la manière dont sont traitées les valeurs zéro. Ces problèmes conduisent en général à des estimations biaisées et inefficaces. La spécification de Poisson du modèle de gravité du commerce a récemment retenu l'attention en tant qu'alternative à l'hypothèse de log-normalité (Santos Silva et Tenreyro, 2006). Toutefois, le modèle standard de Poisson est vulnérable en ce qui concerne les problèmes d'hyperdispersion et de flux d'excès en zéro. Afin de surmonter ces problèmes, cet article considère des estimations de Poisson modifiées à effets fixes (binomiale négative, zéro-inflated). En élargissant ce modèle empirique rapporté par Santos Silva et Tenreyro (2006), nous démontrons que ces techniques peuvent apporter des méthodes alternatives viables à la spécification log-normale, ainsi qu’à la spécification Poisson standard du modèle de gravité du commerce. Sobre la especificación del modelo de gravedad del comercio: estimaciones cero, cero en exceso y cero infladas Résumén Los estudios convencionales de patrones de comercio bilateral especifican una ecuación de gravedad log-normal para la estimación empírica. No obstante, la ecuación de gravedad log-normal tiene tres problemas: el sesgo creado por la transformación logarítmica, el fracaso de la suposición de homocedasticidad, y la forma en que se tratan los valores cero. Estos problemas generalmente arrojan estimaciones sesgadas e ineficientes. Recientemente, la especificación Poisson del modelo de gravedad del comercio ha recibido atención como una alternativa a la suposición de log-normalidad (Santos Silva y Tenreyro, 2006). Sin embargo, el modelo Poisson estándar es vulnerable por problemas de sobredispersión y exceso de flujos cero. Para superar estos problemas, este estudio considera las estimaciones modificadas Poisson de efecto fijo (binomial negativa, cero-infladas). Al extender el modelo empírico propuesto por Santos Silva y Tenreyro (2006), mostramos que estas técnicas pueden proporcionar alternativas viables para especificaciones log-normal y Poisson estándar del modelo de gravedad del comercio.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Spatial Economic Analysis.

Volume (Year): 4 (2009)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 167-190

in new window

Handle: RePEc:taf:specan:v:4:y:2009:i:2:p:167-190
DOI: 10.1080/17421770902834327
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. James E. Anderson & Eric van Wincoop, 2003. "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 170-192, March.
  2. Ghazalian, Pascal & Tamini, Lota & Larue, Bruno & Gervais, Jean-Philippe, 2007. "A Gravity approach to evaluate the significance of trade liberalization in vertically-related goods in the presence of non-tariff barriers," MPRA Paper 2744, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  3. Vuong, Quang H, 1989. "Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-nested Hypotheses," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 307-333, March.
  4. Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso, 2013. "The log of gravity revisited," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(3), pages 311-327, January.
  5. Mullahy, John, 1986. "Specification and testing of some modified count data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 341-365, December.
  6. Henri L. F. de Groot & Gert-Jan Linders & Piet Rietveld & Uma Subramanian, 2004. "The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 103-123, 02.
  7. Gert-Jan M. Linders & Martijn J. Burger & Frank G. van Oort, 2008. "A rather empty world: the many faces of distance and the persistent resistance to international trade," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 1(3), pages 439-458.
  8. Gourieroux, Christian & Monfort, Alain & Trognon, Alain, 1984. "Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Methods: Applications to Poisson Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 701-720, May.
  9. Robert C. Feenstra & Robert E. Lipsey & Haiyan Deng & Alyson C. Ma & Hengyong Mo, 2005. "World Trade Flows: 1962-2000," NBER Working Papers 11040, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  10. Rauch, James E., 1999. "Networks versus markets in international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 7-35, June.
  11. J M Haworth & P J Vincent, 1979. "The Stochastic Disturbance Specification and its Implications for Log-Linear Regression," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 11(7), pages 781-790, July.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:specan:v:4:y:2009:i:2:p:167-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.