IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/specan/v4y2009i2p167-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Specification of the Gravity Model of Trade: Zeros, Excess Zeros and Zero-inflated Estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Martijn Burger
  • Frank van Oort
  • Gert-Jan Linders

Abstract

Abstract Conventional studies of bilateral trade patterns specify a log-normal gravity equation for empirical estimation. However, the log-normal gravity equation suffers from three problems: the bias created by the logarithmic transformation, the failure of the homoskedasticity assumption, and the way zero values are treated. These problems normally result in biased and inefficient estimates. Recently, the Poisson specification of the trade gravity model has received attention as an alternative to the log-normality assumption (Santos Silva & Tenreyro, 2006). However, the standard Poisson model is vulnerable for problems of overdispersion and excess zero flows. To overcome these problems, this paper considers modified Poisson fixed-effects estimations (negative binomial, zero-inflated). Extending the empirical model put forward by Santos Silva & Tenreyro (2006), we show how these techniques may provide viable alternatives to both the log-normal and standard Poisson specification of the gravity model of trade. Caractéristiques du modèle de gravité du commerce: zéros, zéros en excès et estimation du zéro-inflated Résumé Des études conventionnelles sur la structure des échanges commerciaux bilatéraux définissent une équation de gravité log-normale pour estimation empirique. Cependant, l’équation de gravité log-normale souffre de trois problèmes: le biais créé par la transformation logarithmique, l’échec de l'hypothèse d'homoscédasticité, et la manière dont sont traitées les valeurs zéro. Ces problèmes conduisent en général à des estimations biaisées et inefficaces. La spécification de Poisson du modèle de gravité du commerce a récemment retenu l'attention en tant qu'alternative à l'hypothèse de log-normalité (Santos Silva et Tenreyro, 2006). Toutefois, le modèle standard de Poisson est vulnérable en ce qui concerne les problèmes d'hyperdispersion et de flux d'excès en zéro. Afin de surmonter ces problèmes, cet article considère des estimations de Poisson modifiées à effets fixes (binomiale négative, zéro-inflated). En élargissant ce modèle empirique rapporté par Santos Silva et Tenreyro (2006), nous démontrons que ces techniques peuvent apporter des méthodes alternatives viables à la spécification log-normale, ainsi qu’à la spécification Poisson standard du modèle de gravité du commerce. Sobre la especificación del modelo de gravedad del comercio: estimaciones cero, cero en exceso y cero infladas Résumén Los estudios convencionales de patrones de comercio bilateral especifican una ecuación de gravedad log-normal para la estimación empírica. No obstante, la ecuación de gravedad log-normal tiene tres problemas: el sesgo creado por la transformación logarítmica, el fracaso de la suposición de homocedasticidad, y la forma en que se tratan los valores cero. Estos problemas generalmente arrojan estimaciones sesgadas e ineficientes. Recientemente, la especificación Poisson del modelo de gravedad del comercio ha recibido atención como una alternativa a la suposición de log-normalidad (Santos Silva y Tenreyro, 2006). Sin embargo, el modelo Poisson estándar es vulnerable por problemas de sobredispersión y exceso de flujos cero. Para superar estos problemas, este estudio considera las estimaciones modificadas Poisson de efecto fijo (binomial negativa, cero-infladas). Al extender el modelo empírico propuesto por Santos Silva y Tenreyro (2006), mostramos que estas técnicas pueden proporcionar alternativas viables para especificaciones log-normal y Poisson estándar del modelo de gravedad del comercio.

Suggested Citation

  • Martijn Burger & Frank van Oort & Gert-Jan Linders, 2009. "On the Specification of the Gravity Model of Trade: Zeros, Excess Zeros and Zero-inflated Estimation," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 167-190.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:specan:v:4:y:2009:i:2:p:167-190
    DOI: 10.1080/17421770902834327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.taylorandfrancisonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17421770902834327
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James E. Anderson & Eric van Wincoop, 2003. "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 170-192, March.
    2. Ghazalian, Pascal & Tamini, Lota & Larue, Bruno & Gervais, Jean-Philippe, 2007. "A Gravity approach to evaluate the significance of trade liberalization in vertically-related goods in the presence of non-tariff barriers," MPRA Paper 2744, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Jeffrey A. Frankel, 1997. "Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 72.
    4. Vuong, Quang H, 1989. "Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-nested Hypotheses," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 307-333, March.
    5. Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso, 2013. "The log of gravity revisited," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(3), pages 311-327, January.
    6. Mullahy, John, 1986. "Specification and testing of some modified count data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 341-365, December.
    7. Henri L. F. de Groot & Gert-Jan Linders & Piet Rietveld & Uma Subramanian, 2004. "The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 103-123, February.
    8. Gert-Jan M. Linders & Martijn J. Burger & Frank G. van Oort, 2008. "A rather empty world: the many faces of distance and the persistent resistance to international trade," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 1(3), pages 439-458.
    9. Gourieroux, Christian & Monfort, Alain & Trognon, Alain, 1984. "Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Methods: Applications to Poisson Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 701-720, May.
    10. Robert C. Feenstra & Robert E. Lipsey & Haiyan Deng & Alyson C. Ma & Hengyong Mo, 2005. "World Trade Flows: 1962-2000," NBER Working Papers 11040, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Rauch, James E., 1999. "Networks versus markets in international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 7-35, June.
    12. J M Haworth & P J Vincent, 1979. "The Stochastic Disturbance Specification and its Implications for Log-Linear Regression," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 11(7), pages 781-790, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International trade; distance; gravity model; modified Poisson models; C13; C21; F15;

    JEL classification:

    • C82 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Macroeconomic Data; Data Access
    • F17 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Forecasting and Simulation
    • M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics
    • M13 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - New Firms; Startups
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:specan:v:4:y:2009:i:2:p:167-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RSEA20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.