IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sumafo/v25y2017i3d10.1007_s00550-017-0465-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable management at Indian Railways: how a self-evaluation tool for barrier analysis facilitates green procurement
[Nachhaltige Unternehmensführung bei der Indischen Eisenbahn: Wie ein Selbstevaluierungsinstrument zur Hemmnisanalyse umweltfreundliche Beschaffung fördert]

Author

Listed:
  • Edeltraud Guenther

    (Technische Universitaet Dresden)

  • Anne-Karen Hueske

    (Technische Universitaet Dresden)

  • Sanjay Kumar

    (Ministry of Railway)

  • Rhama Parthasarathy

    (Ministry of Rural Development)

Abstract

A self-evaluation tool for green procurement, which was developed in research projects, stimulates and thereby enhances the research’s impact beyond academia. Its application to Indian Railways raised awareness through surveys and workshops, facilitated the establishment of organizational structures, and by these means advanced the organization’s sustainable management. The Sustainable Purchasing Leadership Council recognized this commitment of Sanjay Kumar with the Individual Leadership Award 2017.

Suggested Citation

  • Edeltraud Guenther & Anne-Karen Hueske & Sanjay Kumar & Rhama Parthasarathy, 2017. "Sustainable management at Indian Railways: how a self-evaluation tool for barrier analysis facilitates green procurement [Nachhaltige Unternehmensführung bei der Indischen Eisenbahn: Wie ein Selbst," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 235-246, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sumafo:v:25:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s00550-017-0465-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s00550-017-0465-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00550-017-0465-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00550-017-0465-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nader Abdul-Hadi & Abdulsalam Al-Sudairi & Saleh Alqahtani, 2005. "Prioritizing barriers to successful business process re-engineering (BPR) efforts in Saudi Arabian construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 305-315.
    2. McGaughey, Ronald E. & Snyder, Charles A., 1994. "The obstacles to successful CIM," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2-3), pages 247-258, December.
    3. Olivier Boiral, 2009. "Greening the Corporation Through Organizational Citizenship Behaviors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 87(2), pages 221-236, June.
    4. Allen, Rhonda Y. W., 2002. "Assessing the impediments to organizational change: A view of community policing," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 511-517.
    5. Baldwin, John & Lin, Zhengxi, 2002. "Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Galia, Fabrice & Legros, Diego, 2004. "Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: evidence from France," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1185-1199, October.
    7. Sandford Borins, 2000. "What border? Public management innovation in the United States and Canada," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(1), pages 46-74.
    8. Abagail McWilliams & Donald Siegel, 2000. "Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(5), pages 603-609, May.
    9. John Storey, 2000. "The Management Of Innovation Problem," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(03), pages 347-369.
    10. Edeltraud Günther & Lilly Scheibe, 2006. "The hurdle analysis. A self‐evaluation tool for municipalities to identify, analyse and overcome hurdles to green procurement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 61-77, May.
    11. Edeltraud Guenther & Lilly Scheibe & Vera Greschner Farkavcová, 2010. "“The Hurdles Analysis” as an instrument for improving sustainable stewardship," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 340-356, March.
    12. Lisa‐Henri Kirkland & Dixon Thompson, 1999. "Challenges in designing, implementing and operating an environmental management system," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(2), pages 128-143, March.
    13. Rohdin, P. & Thollander, P., 2006. "Barriers to and driving forces for energy efficiency in the non-energy intensive manufacturing industry in Sweden," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 1836-1844.
    14. AfDB AfDB, . "Annual Report 2012," Annual Report, African Development Bank, number 461.
    15. D’Este, Pablo & Iammarino, Simona & Savona, Maria & von Tunzelmann, Nick, 2012. "What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 482-488.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leoncini, Riccardo, 2016. "Learning-by-failing. An empirical exercise on CIS data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 376-386.
    2. Zahler, Andrés & Goya, Daniel & Caamaño, Matías, 2022. "The primacy of demand and financial obstacles in hindering innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    3. Blind, Knut & Petersen, Sören S. & Riillo, Cesare A.F., 2017. "The impact of standards and regulation on innovation in uncertain markets," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 249-264.
    4. Gabriele Pellegrino, 2015. "Barriers to innovation: can firm age help lower them?," Working Papers 2015/3, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    5. Ortiz, Rodrigo & Fernandez, Viviana, 2022. "Business perception of obstacles to innovate: Evidence from Chile with pseudo-panel data analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    6. Gabriele Pellegrino, 2018. "Barriers to innovation in young and mature firms," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 181-206, January.
    7. Arnaud Le Van, 2020. "Les barrières pour le développement de produits verts et la rentabilité des PME vietnamiennes," Working Papers hal-02482057, HAL.
    8. Hölzl, Werner & Janger, Jürgen, 2013. "Does the analysis of innovation barriers perceived by high growth firms provide information on innovation policy priorities?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(8), pages 1450-1468.
    9. Arif Hartono & Ratih Kusumawardhani, 2019. "Innovation Barriers and Their Impact on Innovation: Evidence from Indonesian Manufacturing Firms," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 20(5), pages 1196-1213, October.
    10. Luisa Gagliardi & Simona Iammarino, 2017. "Innovation in risky markets. Multinational and domestic firms in the UK regions," Working Papers 37, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Mar 2017.
    11. Hölzl, Werner & Janger, Jürgen, 2014. "Distance to the frontier and the perception of innovation barriers across European countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 707-725.
    12. Pavla Matulova & Petra Maresova & Mohammad Ali Tareq & Kamil Kuča, 2018. "Open Innovation Session as a Tool Supporting Innovativeness in Strategies for High-Tech Companies in the Czech Republic," Economies, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Luisa Gagliardi & Simona Iammarino, 2018. "Innovation in risky markets: ownership and location advantages in the UK regions," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 18(5), pages 1177-1201.
    14. Pellegrino, Gabriele & Savona, Maria, 2013. "Is money all? Financing versus knowledge and demand constraints to innovation," MERIT Working Papers 2013-029, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    15. Vicente Salas-Fumás & Javier Ortiz, 2019. "Innovations’ Success and Failure in the Business Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Jakub Tabas & Michaela Beranová & Jan Vavřina, 2011. "Barriers to development of the innovation potential in the small and medium-sized enterprises," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 59(7), pages 447-458.
    17. Jose García-Quevedo & Francisco Mas-Verdú & Gabriele Pellegrino, 2017. "What firms don’t know can hurt them: Overcoming a lack of information on technology," Working Papers 2017/19, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    18. Davide Antonioli & Alberto Marzucchi & Maria Savona, 2017. "Pain shared, pain halved? Cooperation as a coping strategy for innovation barriers," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 841-864, August.
    19. Pellegrino, Gabriele & Savona, Maria, 2013. "Is money all? Financing versus knowledge and demand constraints to innovation," MERIT Working Papers 029, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    20. Tran Thi Bach Yen & Le Binh Minh & Tran Thu Huong, 2019. "Analyzing the Barriers to Innovation Development in Emerging Economies: Vietnamese Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) as an Empirical Case," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(1), pages 64-77, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sumafo:v:25:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s00550-017-0465-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.