IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v77y2025i2d10.1007_s41471-025-00211-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Hedge Funds Predict Takeover Offers and Outcomes?—The Influence of Hedge Fund Ownership on Takeover Likelihood and Offer Success

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa M. Uhlenkamp

    (HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management)

  • Bernhard Schwetzler

    (HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management)

  • Wilhelm Althammer

    (HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management)

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of a company’s shareholder structure, particularly hedge fund ownership, on its likelihood to become target of a takeover offer. Additionally, it explores the consequences of such an offer within the context of the German takeover market. In line with prior research, we find that the presence of a hedge fund stake increases the likelihood of a firm receiving a takeover offer. However, the underlying reasons for this correlation remain a subject of debate in the academic literature, specifically whether it is due to hedge funds’ superior investment strategies, their role as activists, or their access to private information. We find that ownership structure is the primary predictor of takeover activity, while publicly available data offers limited predictive power. These findings, supported by supplementary tests, lend credence to the hypothesis that hedge funds profit from private information. In relation to the outcome of a takeover offer, we observe that unique characteristics of German corporate law, particularly the high level of minority protection, empower hedge funds to employ strategies beyond the conventional speculation on a takeover offer. A prevalent strategy among hedge funds in German takeovers entails the speculation on higher compensation through subsequent structural measures, such as the signing of a domination agreement or a squeeze-out following a successful offer. This creates a particular prisoner’s dilemma for hedge funds as target shareholders: to maximize gains, they should refrain from tendering their shares, while other shareholders must tender theirs for the offer to succeed. Our results on the impact of pre-offer hedge fund ownership reflect this tension: we find some evidence of a positive impact on offer success, though this effect becomes insignificant when focusing on conditional offers with a minimum acceptance threshold. Furthermore, our findings imply a negative relationship between pre-offer hedge fund ownership and the offer premium, thereby supporting the view that bidders anticipate hedge funds’ low sensitivity to premium increases when deciding whether to tender their shares. In conclusion, our results underscore the growing influence of hedge funds in German takeover offers.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa M. Uhlenkamp & Bernhard Schwetzler & Wilhelm Althammer, 2025. "Can Hedge Funds Predict Takeover Offers and Outcomes?—The Influence of Hedge Fund Ownership on Takeover Likelihood and Offer Success," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 77(2), pages 309-355, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:77:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s41471-025-00211-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s41471-025-00211-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41471-025-00211-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41471-025-00211-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    M&A; Takeover likelihood; Hedge fund; Ownership structure; Offer premium;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:77:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s41471-025-00211-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.