PEDAKSI: Methodology for Collecting Data about Survey Non-Respondents
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.
Other versions of this item:
- Lynn, Peter, 2002. "PEDAKSI: methodology for collecting data about survey non-respondents," ISER Working Paper Series 2002-05, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
References listed on IDEAS
- Whitehead, John C. & Groothuis, Peter A. & Blomquist, Glenn C., 1993. "Testing for non-response and sample selection bias in contingent valuation : Analysis of a combination phone/mail survey," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 215-220.
- Edith de Leeuw, 2001. "Reducing Missing Data in Surveys: An Overview of Methods," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 147-160, May.
CitationsCitations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Brick J. Michael, 2013. "Rejoinder," Journal of Official Statistics, De Gruyter Open, vol. 29(3), pages 371-374, June.
- Sadig, Husam, 2014. "Weighting for non-monotonic response pattern in longitudinal surveys," ISER Working Paper Series 2014-34, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
More about this item
KeywordsUnit non-response; bias; validity; survey of non-respondents; British Crime Survey;
StatisticsAccess and download statistics
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:37:y:2003:i:3:p:239-261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .