IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcsosc/v8y2025i2d10.1007_s42001-025-00365-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sentiment analysis of solar energy in U.S. Cities: a 10-year analysis using transformer-based deep learning

Author

Listed:
  • Serena Y. Kim

    (North Carolina State University)

  • Crystal Soderman

    (University of Colorado Denver)

  • Lan Sang

    (University of Colorado Boulder)

Abstract

This study examines U.S. public sentiment toward solar energy from 2013 to 2022 by analyzing 8 million social media posts using RoBERTa, a transformer-based deep learning algorithm. While sentiment has been generally positive, it has declined since 2016, driven by increasing negativity. The analysis reveals significant and widening regional disparities, with Republican-leaning and Southern U.S. regions showing more pronounced negativity. A two-way fixed-effects panel analysis at the municipality level indicates that positive sentiment is associated with high solar radiation and a larger remote-working population, while negative sentiment is linked to a greater prevalence of multifamily housing. These results highlight the complex interplay of environmental, socioeconomic, political, and technological factors in shaping solar energy sentiment and underscore the need for tailored, region-specific strategies. The computational approach, which combines natural language processing and geospatial analysis of social media data, provides a scalable framework for sentiment analysis across diverse topics and regions, extending beyond the specific case of solar energy in the United States.

Suggested Citation

  • Serena Y. Kim & Crystal Soderman & Lan Sang, 2025. "Sentiment analysis of solar energy in U.S. Cities: a 10-year analysis using transformer-based deep learning," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 1-26, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:8:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s42001-025-00365-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s42001-025-00365-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42001-025-00365-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s42001-025-00365-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valeriu-Sebastian Hudișteanu & Nelu-Cristian Cherecheș & Florin-Emilian Țurcanu & Iuliana Hudișteanu & Claudiu Romila, 2024. "Impact of Temperature on the Efficiency of Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Photovoltaic Panels: A Comprehensive Experimental Analysis for Sustainable Energy Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Hilary S. Boudet, 2019. "Public perceptions of and responses to new energy technologies," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 4(6), pages 446-455, June.
    3. Peter D. Howe & Matto Mildenberger & Jennifer R. Marlon & Anthony Leiserowitz, 2015. "Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local scales in the USA," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(6), pages 596-603, June.
    4. Severin Borenstein & Lucas W. Davis, 2016. "The Distributional Effects of US Clean Energy Tax Credits," Tax Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(1), pages 191-234.
    5. Jiang Qingyang & Yang Jichun & Zeng Yanying & Fu Huide, 2021. "Energy and exergy analyses of PV, solar thermal and photovoltaic/thermal systems: a comparison study [Review on recent photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) technology advances and applications]," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 604-611.
    6. Susskind, Lawrence & Chun, Jungwoo & Gant, Alexander & Hodgkins, Chelsea & Cohen, Jessica & Lohmar, Sarah, 2022. "Sources of opposition to renewable energy projects in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    7. Best, Rohan & Burke, Paul J. & Nishitateno, Shuhei, 2019. "Understanding the determinants of rooftop solar installation: evidence from household surveys in Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(4), July.
    8. Gustafson, Abel & Goldberg, Matthew H. & Kotcher, John E. & Rosenthal, Seth A. & Maibach, Edward W. & Ballew, Matthew T. & Leiserowitz, Anthony, 2020. "Republicans and Democrats differ in why they support renewable energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    9. Bertsch, Valentin & Hall, Margeret & Weinhardt, Christof & Fichtner, Wolf, 2016. "Public acceptance and preferences related to renewable energy and grid expansion policy: Empirical insights for Germany," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 465-477.
    10. Serena Y. Kim & Koushik Ganesan & Princess Dickens & Soumya Panda, 2021. "Public Sentiment toward Solar Energy—Opinion Mining of Twitter Using a Transformer-Based Language Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Yanjun Liao, 2020. "Weather and the Decision to Go Solar: Evidence on Costly Cancellations," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 7(1), pages 1-33.
    12. Lawrence C Hamilton & Joel Hartter & Erin Bell, 2019. "Generation gaps in US public opinion on renewable energy and climate change," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, July.
    13. Stefan Lamp, 2023. "Sunspots That Matter: The Effect of Weather on Solar Technology Adoption," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(4), pages 1179-1219, April.
    14. Ribeiro, Fernando & Ferreira, Paula & Araújo, Madalena & Braga, Ana Cristina, 2018. "Modelling perception and attitudes towards renewable energy technologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 688-697.
    15. Leah C. Stokes & Christopher Warshaw, 2017. "Renewable energy policy design and framing influence public support in the United States," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 2(8), pages 1-6, August.
    16. Abel Gustafson & Matthew H. Goldberg & Parrish Bergquist & Karine Lacroix & Seth A. Rosenthal & Anthony Leiserowitz, 2022. "The durable, bipartisan effects of emphasizing the cost savings of renewable energy," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 7(11), pages 1023-1030, November.
    17. Cherry, Todd L. & Brimley, Peri M. & Longuevan, Joseph D. & Thunström, Linda, 2023. "In-state generation requirements and the acceptability of renewable portfolio standards," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Serena Y. Kim & Koushik Ganesan & Princess Dickens & Soumya Panda, 2021. "Public Sentiment toward Solar Energy—Opinion Mining of Twitter Using a Transformer-Based Language Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Göral, Elif & Hannum, Christopher M., 2024. "The effect of moral framing on attitudes towards offshore wind farms in Turkey," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    3. Lorteau, Steve & Muzzerall, Parker & Deneault, Audrey-Ann & Kennedy, Emily Huddart & Rocque, Rhéa & Racine, Nicole & Bureau, Jean-François, 2024. "Do climate concerns and worries predict energy preferences? A meta-analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    4. Robert Huang & Matthew E. Kahn, 2024. "Do Red States Have a Comparative Advantage in Generating Green Power?," Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(1), pages 200-238.
    5. Bonan, Jacopo & Cattaneo, Cristina & d’Adda, Giovanna & Tavoni, Massimo, 2024. "Heat of the Moment: How Temperature Influences the Search and Purchase of Energy-Using Appliances," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    6. Helmke-Long, Laura & Carley, Sanya & Konisky, David M., 2022. "Municipal government adaptive capacity programs for vulnerable populations during the U.S. energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    7. Ulf J. J. Hahnel & Christian Mumenthaler & Tobia Spampatti & Tobias Brosch, 2020. "Ideology as Filter: Motivated Information Processing and Decision-Making in the Energy Domain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Pedersen, Jaap & Weinand, Jann Michael & Syranidou, Chloi & Rehfeldt, Daniel, 2024. "An efficient solver for large-scale onshore wind farm siting including cable routing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(2), pages 616-630.
    9. Hilary Boudet & Chad Zanocco & Greg Stelmach & Mahmood Muttaqee & June Flora, 2021. "Public preferences for five electricity grid decarbonization policies in California," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(5), pages 510-528, September.
    10. Scovell, Mitchell & McCrea, Rod & Walton, Andrea & Poruschi, Lavinia, 2024. "Local acceptance of solar farms: The impact of energy narratives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    11. Astrid Buchmayr & Luc Van Ootegem & Jo Dewulf & Elsy Verhofstadt, 2021. "Understanding Attitudes towards Renewable Energy Technologies and the Effect of Local Experiences," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    12. Anna Manuella Melo Nunes & Luiz Moreira Coelho Junior & Raphael Abrahão & Edvaldo Pereira Santos Júnior & Flávio José Simioni & Paulo Rotella Junior & Luiz Célio Souza Rocha, 2023. "Public Policies for Renewable Energy: A Review of the Perspectives for a Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-28, January.
    13. Pan He & Pengfei Liu & Yueming (Lucy) Qiu & Lufan Liu, 2022. "The weather affects air conditioner purchases to fill the energy efficiency gap," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    14. James Archsmith & Erich Muehlegger & David S. Rapson, 2022. "Future Paths of Electric Vehicle Adoption in the United States: Predictable Determinants, Obstacles, and Opportunities," Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 3(1), pages 71-110.
    15. So-Yun Jeong & Jae-Wook Kim & Han-Young Joo & Young-Seo Kim & Joo-Hyun Moon, 2021. "Development and Application of a Big Data Analysis-Based Procedure to Identify Concerns about Renewable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-13, August.
    16. Buchmayr, A. & Verhofstadt, E. & Van Ootegem, L. & Thomassen, G. & Taelman, S.E. & Dewulf, J., 2022. "Exploring the global and local social sustainability of wind energy technologies: An application of a social impact assessment framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    17. Hübner, Gundula & Leschinger, Valentin & Müller, Florian J.Y. & Pohl, Johannes, 2023. "Broadening the social acceptance of wind energy – An Integrated Acceptance Model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    18. Shawn Olson Hazboun & Hilary Schaffer Boudet, 2020. "Public Preferences in a Shifting Energy Future: Comparing Public Views of Eight Energy Sources in North America’s Pacific Northwest," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.
    19. Qiao, Kunyuan & Dowell, Glen, 2022. "Environmental concerns, income inequality, and purchase of environmentally-friendly products: A longitudinal study of U.S. counties (2010-2017)," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(4).
    20. Wimhurst, Joshua J. & Greene, J. Scott & Koch, Jennifer, 2023. "Predicting commercial wind farm site suitability in the conterminous United States using a logistic regression model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:8:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s42001-025-00365-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.