IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/irpnmk/v22y2025i2d10.1007_s12208-025-00429-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The nexus of scarcity and donation: exploring the interplay of construal of resources, well-being, trust, and efficacy in nonprofit fundraising

Author

Listed:
  • Bahadır Ayar

    (Istanbul Technical University Graduate School
    Marmara University)

  • Huriye Şebnem Burnaz

    (Istanbul Technical University)

Abstract

Scarcity is an inevitable fact in individuals’ everyday lives. Having limited resources shapes cognition, attitudes, and behaviors. This study aims to explore how scarcity affects individuals’ mindsets and intentions for future donations and how psychological well-being differs after donating different scarce resources. We conducted three scenario-based experimental studies (N = 920). In three studies, we found that donors tend to construe time and money more abstractly when exposed to reminders of scarcity. We also observed that when donors perceive their resources as scarce, donating time yields higher psychological well-being and donation intention than donating money. Furthermore, we have found that donation intention is not moderated by organizational trustworthiness but negatively and partially moderated by perceived donation efficacy. The study provided original contributions to construal level theory and scarcity theory. The outcomes of this research offer remarkable managerial insights for nonprofit organizations in the designation of marketing communication strategies and segmenting donors.

Suggested Citation

  • Bahadır Ayar & Huriye Şebnem Burnaz, 2025. "The nexus of scarcity and donation: exploring the interplay of construal of resources, well-being, trust, and efficacy in nonprofit fundraising," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 22(2), pages 373-411, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:22:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s12208-025-00429-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s12208-025-00429-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12208-025-00429-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12208-025-00429-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaoting Zheng & Jiayue Chen & Yipeng Li, 2021. "The association between charitable giving and happiness: Evidence from the Chinese General Social Survey," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 2103-2138, December.
    2. Couper, Mick P. & Kapteyn, Arie & Schonlau, Matthias & Winter, Joachim, 2007. "Noncoverage and nonresponse in an Internet survey," Munich Reprints in Economics 20093, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    3. Ed Diener & Derrick Wirtz & William Tov & Chu Kim-Prieto & Dong-won Choi & Shigehiro Oishi & Robert Biswas-Diener, 2010. "New Well-being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 97(2), pages 143-156, June.
    4. Wendy Liu & Jennifer Aaker, 2008. "The Happiness of Giving: The Time-Ask Effect," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(3), pages 543-557, May.
    5. Gülen Sarial‑Abi & Aulona Ulqinaku & Giampaolo Viglia & Gopal Das, 2023. "The effect of financial scarcity on discretionary spending, borrowing, and investing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 1214-1243, November.
    6. Gülen Sarial-Abi & Aulona Ulqinaku & Giampaolo Viglia & Gopal Das, 2023. "Correction to: The effect of financial scarcity on discretionary spending, borrowing, and investing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 1244-1244, November.
    7. Stephan Dickert & Janet Kleber & Daniel Västfjäll & Paul Slovic, 2016. "Mental Imagery, Impact, and Affect: A Mediation Model for Charitable Giving," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, February.
    8. Alice Lee-Yoon & Grant E. Donnelly & Ashley V. Whillans, 2020. "Overcoming Resource Scarcity: Consumers’ Response to Gifts Intending to Save Time and Money," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(4), pages 391-403.
    9. Chiraag Mittal & Vladas Griskevicius, 2016. "Silver Spoons and Platinum Plans: How Childhood Environment Affects Adult Health Care Decisions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(4), pages 636-656.
    10. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226316529 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Cassie Mogilner & Jennifer Aaker, 2009. ""The Time vs. Money Effect": Shifting Product Attitudes and Decisions through Personal Connection," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(2), pages 277-291.
    12. Kelly Goldsmith & Vladas Griskevicius & Rebecca Hamilton, 2020. "Scarcity and Consumer Decision Making: Is Scarcity a Mindset, a Threat, a Reference Point, or a Journey?," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(4), pages 358-364.
    13. Ravi Mehta & Meng Zhu, 2016. "Creating When You Have Less: The Impact of Resource Scarcity on Product Use Creativity," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(5), pages 767-782.
    14. Kelly Goldsmith & Caroline Roux & Anne V. Wilson, 2020. "Can Thoughts of Having Less Ever Promote Prosocial Preferences? The Relationship between Scarcity, Construal Level, and Sustainable Product Adoption," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(1), pages 70-82.
    15. Carroll, Ryall & Kachersky, Luke, 2019. "Service fundraising and the role of perceived donation efficacy in individual charitable giving," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 254-263.
    16. Rebecca Hamilton & Debora Thompson & Sterling Bone & Lan Nguyen Chaplin & Vladas Griskevicius & Kelly Goldsmith & Ronald Hill & Deborah Roedder John & Chiraag Mittal & Thomas O’Guinn & Paul Piff & Car, 2019. "The effects of scarcity on consumer decision journeys," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 532-550, May.
    17. Hanyong Park & Ashok K Lalwani & David H Silvera, 2020. "The Impact of Resource Scarcity on Price-Quality Judgments [Hunger Games: Fluctuations in Blood Glucose Levels Influence Support for Social Welfare]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(6), pages 1110-1124.
    18. Hong Zhang & Jiawei Zhu & Li Wei & Wenting Zhang, 2021. "A Comparison between the Psychological Benefits of Giving Money vs. Giving Time," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 2677-2701, August.
    19. Mogilner, Cassie & Aaker, Jennifer L., 2009. "The Time vs. Money Effect: Shifting Product Attitudes and Decisions through Personal Connection," Research Papers 2014, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    20. Malika Malika & Tanuka Ghoshal & Pragya Mathur & Durairaj Maheswaran, 2024. "Does scarcity increase or decrease donation behaviors? An investigation considering resource-specific scarcity and individual person-thing orientation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 426-448, March.
    21. Haiyang Yang & Kuangjie Zhang, 2022. "How Resource Scarcity Influences the Preference for Counterhedonic Consumption [On the Consumption of Negative Feelings]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 48(5), pages 904-919.
    22. Liyin Jin & Yanqun He, 2018. "How the frequency and amount of corporate donations affect consumer perception and behavioral responses," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 1072-1088, November.
    23. María Alonso-Ferres & Ginés Navarro-Carrillo & Marta Garrido-Macías & Eva Moreno-Bella & Inmaculada Valor-Segura, 2020. "Connecting perceived economic threat and prosocial tendencies: The explanatory role of empathic concern," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-25, May.
    24. Rudd, Melanie & Vohs, Kathleen D. & Aaker, Jennifer, 2012. "Awe Expands People's Perception of Time, Alters Decision Making, and Enhances Well-Being," Research Papers 2095, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    25. Jo Holland & Antonio S Silva & Ruth Mace, 2012. "Lost Letter Measure of Variation in Altruistic Behaviour in 20 Neighbourhoods," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-4, August.
    26. Tang, Honghong & Li, Lin & Su, Song, 2022. "Experiencing less leads to the use of more: The effect of a scarcity mindset on product usage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 139-148.
    27. Anne-Laure Sellier & Darren W. Dahl, 2011. "Focus! Creative Success Is Enjoyed Through Restricted Choice," Post-Print hal-00668631, HAL.
    28. Prediger, Sebastian & Vollan, Björn & Herrmann, Benedikt, 2014. "Resource scarcity and antisocial behavior," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 1-9.
    29. Lilavati Krishnan, 2022. "The Scarcity–Prosociality Link: Ambiguous, Yet Thought-provoking," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 34(1), pages 79-103, March.
    30. A. R. Shaheen Hosany & Rebecca W. Hamilton, 2023. "Family responses to resource scarcity," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 1351-1381, November.
    31. Liu, Wendy & Aaker, Jennifer L., 2008. "The Happiness of Giving: The Time-Ask Effect," Research Papers 1998, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. R. Shaheen Hosany & Rebecca W. Hamilton, 2023. "Family responses to resource scarcity," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 1351-1381, November.
    2. Berthold, Anne & Cologna, Viktoria & Siegrist, Michael, 2022. "The influence of scarcity perception on people's pro-environmental behavior and their readiness to accept new sustainable technologies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Malika Malika & Durairaj Maheswaran, 2023. "Busy or poor: How time or money scarcity cues differentially impact purchase decisions regarding service firms," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 1266-1283, November.
    4. Luqiong Tong & Yuhuang Zheng & Ping Zhao, 2013. "Is money really the root of all evil? The impact of priming money on consumer choice," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 119-129, June.
    5. Johnson, Samuel G.B. & Park, Seo Young, 2021. "Moral signaling through donations of money and time," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 183-196.
    6. Chatterjee, Subimal & Rai, Dipankar & Heath, Timothy B., 2016. "Tradeoff between time and money: The asymmetric consideration of opportunity costs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2560-2566.
    7. Gülen Sarial‑Abi & Aulona Ulqinaku & Giampaolo Viglia & Gopal Das, 2023. "The effect of financial scarcity on discretionary spending, borrowing, and investing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 1214-1243, November.
    8. Katina Kulow & Thomas Kramer, 2016. "In Pursuit of Good Karma: When Charitable Appeals to Do Right Go Wrong," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(2), pages 334-353.
    9. Haowen Xiao & Jiayi Guo & Junyi Fang & Ting Xiao & Guocheng Li, 2023. "Impact of resource scarcity on general categorization tendency: The moderating role of perceived mutability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-13, August.
    10. Aaker, Jennifer L. & Rudd, Melanie & Mogilner, Cassie, 2010. "If Money Doesn't Make You Happy, Consider Time," Research Papers 2067, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    11. Abhishek Bhati & Ruth K. Hansen, 2020. "A literature review of experimental studies in fundraising," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 3(1).
    12. Russell W. Belk & Gopal Das & Shailendra Pratap Jain, 2023. "The ubiquity of scarcity," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 1191-1196, November.
    13. Hong Zhang & Jiawei Zhu & Li Wei & Wenting Zhang, 2021. "A Comparison between the Psychological Benefits of Giving Money vs. Giving Time," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 2677-2701, August.
    14. R. Bret Leary & Rhiannon MacDonnell Mesler & Bonnie Simpson & Matthew D. Meng & William Montford, 2022. "Effects of perceived scarcity on COVID‐19 consumer stimulus spending: The roles of ontological insecurity and mutability in predicting prosocial outcomes," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 1046-1061, September.
    15. Erin Percival Carter & Lawrence E. Williams & Nicholas Light, 2024. "Consumers’ minimum time investments in meaningful consumption," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 561-573, December.
    16. Sebastian Lehmann & Martin Reimann, 2012. "The influence of time and money on product evaluations - a neurophysiological analysis," FEMM Working Papers 120011, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    17. Zhao, Xiaohong & Cai, Fengyan & Yang, Zhiyong, 2023. "Are people less generous after a family member gives to charity? The interaction of self-construal and relationship type," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 398-416.
    18. Aaker, Jennifer & Vohs, Kathleen D. & Mogilner, Cassie, 2010. "Non-profits Are Seen as Warm and For-Profits as Competent: Firm Stereotypes Matter," Research Papers 2047, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    19. Yi-Ching Hsieh & Hung-Chang Chiu & Yun-Chia Tang & Wei-Yun Lin, 2018. "Does Raising Value Co-creation Increase All Customers’ Happiness?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(4), pages 1053-1067, November.
    20. Freeman Wu & Martin Reimann & Gratiana Pol & C. Whan Park, 2023. "The scarcity of beauty: how and why product aesthetics mobilize consumer acquisition effort," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 1245-1265, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:22:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s12208-025-00429-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.