IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0286619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of resource scarcity on general categorization tendency: The moderating role of perceived mutability

Author

Listed:
  • Haowen Xiao
  • Jiayi Guo
  • Junyi Fang
  • Ting Xiao
  • Guocheng Li

Abstract

Prior studies revealed varying effects of resource scarcity on individuals’ general categorization tendency. However, little is known about when and why such differences occur. Based on the self-regulatory model of resource scarcity, we examine whether resource scarcity generates higher or lower general categorization tendency depending on the perceived mutability of the resource discrepancy. We conducted two online experiments to test the hypotheses. The results affirmed that when individuals consider the resource discrepancy to be mutable, they are more likely to seek abundance to compensate for resource scarcity, thus reducing their general categorization tendency. In contrast, perceiving the scarcity as immutable triggers the intention to restore a sense of control undermined by the scarcity, increasing individuals’ general categorization tendency. Our findings provide insights into the downstream consequences of resource scarcity and offer significant managerial implications for coping strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Haowen Xiao & Jiayi Guo & Junyi Fang & Ting Xiao & Guocheng Li, 2023. "Impact of resource scarcity on general categorization tendency: The moderating role of perceived mutability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0286619
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0286619
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0286619&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0286619?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0286619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.