IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v27y2025i3d10.1007_s10796-024-10475-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making Sense of AI Benefits: A Mixed-method Study in Canadian Public Administration

Author

Listed:
  • Rohit Madan

    (Queen’s University Belfast)

  • Mona Ashok

    (University of Reading)

Abstract

Public administrators receive conflicting signals on the transformative benefits of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the counternarratives of AI’s ethical impacts on society and democracy. Against this backdrop, this paper explores the factors that affect the sensemaking of AI benefits in Canadian public administration. A mixed-method research design using PLS-SEM (n = 272) and interviews (n = 38) tests and explains the effect of institutional and consultant pressures on the perceived benefits of AI use. The quantitative study shows only service coercive pressures have a significant effect on perceived benefits of AI use and consultant pressures are significant in generating all institutional pressures. The qualitative study explains the results and highlights the underlying mechanisms. The key conclusion is that in the earlier stages of AI adoption, demand pull is the main driver rather than technology push. A processual sensemaking model is developed extending the theory on institutions and sensemaking. And several managerial implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Rohit Madan & Mona Ashok, 2025. "Making Sense of AI Benefits: A Mixed-method Study in Canadian Public Administration," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 889-923, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:27:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-024-10475-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-024-10475-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-024-10475-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-024-10475-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mary Ann Glynn & Lee Watkiss, 2020. "Of Organizing and Sensemaking: From Action to Meaning and Back Again in a Half‐Century of Weick’s Theorizing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(7), pages 1331-1354, November.
    2. Richter, Doreen, 2014. "Demographic change and innovation: The ongoing challenge from the diversity of the labor force," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 25(3), pages 166-184.
    3. Luc Bernier & Taïeb Hafsi & Carl Deschamps, 2015. "Environmental Determinants of Public Sector Innovation: A study of innovation awards in Canada," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(6), pages 834-856, July.
    4. John Hulland, 1999. "Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 195-204, February.
    5. Harvey, David, 2007. "A Brief History of Neoliberalism," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199283279.
    6. Larry Seligman, 2006. "Sensemaking throughout adoption and the innovation‐decision process," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(1), pages 108-120, January.
    7. Richard M. Walker & Claudia N. Avellaneda & Frances S. Berry, 2011. "Exploring The Diffusion Of Innovation Among High And Low Innovative Localities," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 95-125, January.
    8. Wang, Changlin & Teo, Thompson S.H. & Janssen, Marijn, 2021. "Public and private value creation using artificial intelligence: An empirical study of AI voice robot users in Chinese public sector," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    9. Rosie Collington, 2022. "Disrupting the Welfare State? Digitalisation and the Retrenchment of Public Sector Capacity," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 312-328, March.
    10. Carsten Greve, 2015. "Ideas in Public Management Reform for the 2010s. Digitalization, Value Creation and Involvement," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 49-65, March.
    11. Desouza, Kevin C. & Dawson, Gregory S. & Chenok, Daniel, 2020. "Designing, developing, and deploying artificial intelligence systems: Lessons from and for the public sector," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 205-213.
    12. Ramona S. McNeal & Caroline J. Tolbert & Karen Mossberger & Lisa J. Dotterweich, 2003. "Innovating in Digital Government in the American States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 84(1), pages 52-70, March.
    13. Wang, Yingli & Singgih, Meita & Wang, Jingyao & Rit, Mihaela, 2019. "Making sense of blockchain technology: How will it transform supply chains?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 221-236.
    14. Ashok, Mona & Madan, Rohit & Joha, Anton & Sivarajah, Uthayasankar, 2022. "Ethical framework for Artificial Intelligence and Digital technologies," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    15. Kuziemski, Maciej & Misuraca, Gianluca, 2020. "AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6).
    16. Amany Elbanna & Henrik C. J. Linderoth, 2015. "The formation of technology mental models: the case of voluntary use of technology in organizational setting," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 95-108, February.
    17. Sanja Korac & Iris Saliterer & Richard M. Walker, 2017. "Analysing the environmental antecedents of innovation adoption among politicians and public managers," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 566-587, April.
    18. Danielle Morin, 2008. "Auditors general's universe revisited: An exploratory study of the influence they exert on public administration through their value for money audits," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(7), pages 697-720, July.
    19. Daqing Zheng & Jin Chen & Lihua Huang & Cheng Zhang, 2013. "E-government adoption in public administration organizations: integrating institutional theory perspective and resource-based view," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 221-234, March.
    20. Momani, Bessma, 2013. "Management consultants and the United States’ public sector," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 381-399, October.
    21. Bernd W. Wirtz & Paul F. Langer & Carolina Fenner, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector - a Research Agenda," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(13), pages 1103-1128, October.
    22. Christine Oliver, 1997. "Sustainable competitive advantage: combining institutional and resource‐based views," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(9), pages 697-713, October.
    23. Ines Mergel, 2018. "Open innovation in the public sector: drivers and barriers for the adoption of Challenge.gov," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 726-745, May.
    24. Jansen, J.J.P. & van den Bosch, F.A.J. & Volberda, H.W., 2005. "Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How do Organizational Antecedents matter?," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2005-025-STR, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    25. Richter, Doreen, 2014. "Demographic change and innovation: The ongoing challenge from the diversity of the labor force," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 25(3), pages 166-184.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khalid Alshehhi & Ali Cheaitou & Hamad Rashid, 2025. "Investigating risk elements and critical success factors for AI procurement projects in the public sector: a qualitative approach based on UAE public organisations," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 16(2), pages 446-467, February.
    2. Agbabiaka, Olusegun & Ojo, Adegboyega & Connolly, Niall, 2025. "Requirements for trustworthy AI-enabled automated decision-making in the public sector: A systematic review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    3. MEDAGLIA Rony & MIKALEF Patrick & TANGI Luca, 2024. "Competences and governance practices for artificial intelligence in the public sector," JRC Research Reports JRC138702, Joint Research Centre.
    4. Xin Liu & Lin Zhang & Abhinav Gupta & Xiaoming Zheng & Changqi Wu, 2022. "Upper echelons and intra‐organizational learning: How executive narcissism affects knowledge transfer among business units," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(11), pages 2351-2381, November.
    5. Zhang, Weidong & Zuo, Na & He, Wu & Li, Songtao & Yu, Lu, 2021. "Factors influencing the use of artificial intelligence in government: Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    6. Mennens, Kars & van Gils, Anita & Odekerken - Schröder, Gaby & Letterie, Wilko, 2016. "Exploring Antecedents of Service Innovation Excellence in Manufacturing SMEs," Research Memorandum 025, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    7. Tan Yigitcanlar & Rashid Mehmood & Juan M. Corchado, 2021. "Green Artificial Intelligence: Towards an Efficient, Sustainable and Equitable Technology for Smart Cities and Futures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Cinar, Emre & Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Acik, Ahmet Coskun & Simms, Chris, 2024. "Public sector innovation in a city state: exploring innovation types and national context in Singapore," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    9. Engelen, Andreas & Kube, Harald & Schmidt, Susanne & Flatten, Tessa Christina, 2014. "Entrepreneurial orientation in turbulent environments: The moderating role of absorptive capacity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(8), pages 1353-1369.
    10. Barrutia, Jose M. & Echebarria, Carmen & Aguado-Moralejo, Itziar & Apaolaza-Ibáñez, Vanessa & Hartmann, Patrick, 2022. "Leading smart city projects: Government dynamic capabilities and public value creation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    11. Grote, Markus & Herstatt, Cornelius & Gemünden, Hans-Georg, 2012. "Cross-divisional innovation in large, multi-divisional firms: Economic relevance and managerial actions," Working Papers 66, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    12. Ramendra Verma & Shikha Kapoor, 2024. "Exploring barriers to acceptance of artificial intelligence in social welfare schemes of governments in India – a systematic literature review," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(11), pages 5139-5156, November.
    13. Yaqun Yi & Yi Liu & Hong He & Yuan Li, 2012. "Environment, governance, controls, and radical innovation during institutional transitions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 689-708, September.
    14. Cepeda-Carrión, Ignacio & Leal-Millán, Antonio G. & Ortega-Gutierrez, Jaime & Leal-Rodriguez, Antonio L., 2015. "Linking unlearning with service quality through learning processes in the Spanish banking industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1450-1457.
    15. Francesco Chirico & Carlo Salvato, 2016. "Knowledge Internalization and Product Development in Family Firms: When Relational and Affective Factors Matter," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(1), pages 201-229, January.
    16. Irina TARABAN & Alina Nicoleta BONCILICA & Maria Andreea TILIBASA & Ovidiu DRANGA & Dorin Felician MARCHIS, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis Of The Relationship Between Workforce Diversity And Innovation," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(1), pages 766-783, November.
    17. Busch, Timo, 2011. "Organizational adaptation to disruptions in the natural environment: The case of climate change," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 389-404.
    18. Noha Diab & Nicoleta Isac & Cosmin Dobrin, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Jobs: The Impact of Pandemic on Governmental Organizations in Istanbul - Turkey," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(1), pages 46-64, March.
    19. Arundel, Anthony & Bloch, Carter & Ferguson, Barry, 2019. "Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 789-798.
    20. Kamal Sakhdari & J. Henri Burgers, 2018. "The moderating role of entrepreneurial management in the relationship between absorptive capacity and corporate entrepreneurship: an attention-based view," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 927-950, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:27:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-024-10475-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.