Nonparametric Tests of Panel Conditioning and Attrition Bias in Panel Surveys
Download full text from publisher
CitationsCitations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Thomas F. Crossley & Jochem Bresser & Liam Delaney & Joachim Winter, 2017.
"Can Survey Participation Alter Household Saving Behaviour?,"
Royal Economic Society, vol. 127(606), pages 2332-2357, November.
- Thomas Crossley & Jochem de Bresser & Liam Delaney & Joachim K. Winter, 2014. "Can survey participation alter household saving behavior?," IFS Working Papers W14/06, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
- Winter, Joachim & Crossley, Thomas & de Bresser, Jochem & Delaney, Liam, 2014. "Can Survey Participation Alter Household Saving Behavior?," Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100379, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
- Nic Baigrie & Katherine Eyal, 2014.
"An Evaluation of the Determinants and Implications of Panel Attrition in the National Income Dynamics Survey (2008-2010),"
South African Journal of Economics,
Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 82(1), pages 39-65, March.
- Nic Baigrie & Katherine Eyal, 2013. "An evaluation of the determinants and implications of panel attrition in the National Income Dynamics Survey (2008 – 2010)," SALDRU Working Papers 103, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town.
- Rene Segers & Philip Hans Franses, 2014.
"Panel design effects on response rates and response quality,"
Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 68(1), pages 1-24, February.
- Seger, R. & Franses, Ph.H.B.F., 2007. "Panel design effects on response rates and response quality," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2007-29, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
- André van Stel & Werner Liebregts & Nardo de Vries, 2013. "Explaining entrepreneurial performance of solo self-employed from a motivational perspective," Scales Research Reports H201308, EIM Business and Policy Research.
- Lola Hernandez & Robbert-Jan 't Hoen & Juanita Raat, 2017. "Survey shortcuts? Evidence from a payment diary survey," DNB Working Papers 546, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
- Schwandt, Hannes, 2016.
"Unmet aspirations as an explanation for the age U-shape in wellbeing,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,
Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 75-87.
- Schwandt, Hannes, 2014. "Unmet Aspirations as an Explanation for the Age U-shape in Wellbeing," Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100360, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
- Bert Van Landeghem & Anneleen Vandeplas, 2016.
"Lower in rank, but happier: the complex relationship between status and happiness,"
LICOS Discussion Papers
38516, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, KU Leuven.
- Bert Van Landeghem & Anneleen Vandeplas, 2016. " Lower in rank, but happier: the complex relationship between status and happiness," Working Papers LICOS Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance 556194, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business, LICOS Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance.
- Bert Van Landeghem & Anneleen Vandeplas, 2016. "Lower in Rank, but Happier: The Complex Relationship between Status and Happiness," Working Papers id:11441, eSocialSciences.
- repec:iza:izawol:journl:2017:n:352 is not listed on IDEAS
- Adrian Chadi, 2016. "Identification of Attrition Bias Using Different Types of Panel Refreshments," IAAEU Discussion Papers 201602, Institute of Labour Law and Industrial Relations in the European Union (IAAEU).
- Bach, Ruben & Eckman, Stephanie, 2017. "Does participating in a panel survey change respondents' labor market behavior?," IAB Discussion Paper 201715, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
- Bert Van Landeghem, 2012. "Panel Conditioning and Self-Reported Satisfaction: Evidence from International Panel Data and Repeated Cross-Sections," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 484, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
- Van Landeghem, Bert, 2014. "A test based on panel refreshments for panel conditioning in stated utility measures," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 236-238.
- Mark Wooden & Ning Li, 2014. "Panel Conditioning and Subjective Well-being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 117(1), pages 235-255, May.
- Khandker, Shahidur R & Samad, Hussain A, 2016. "Bangladesh’s Achievement in Poverty Reduction: The Role of Microfinance Revisited," Working Papers 114, JICA Research Institute.
- Mine Kühn & Christian Dudel & Tobias C. Vogt & Anna Oksuzyan, 2017. "Trends in gender differences in health and mortality at working ages among West and East Germans," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2017-009, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
More about this item
Keywordspanel conditioning; attrition bias; measurement error; panel surveys;
StatisticsAccess and download statistics
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:40:y:2011:i:1:p:32-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.